Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:quant-ph/0404121 · Foundations of Physics

An Analysis of Stapp’s “A Bell-Type Theorem without Hidden Variables”

Abner Shimony

Published Jan 1, 2006• 12 citations
arXivHTMLPDF
DOI
10.1007/s10701-005-9002-3

Related papers

Comments on Shimony’s “An Analysis of Stapp’s ‘A Bell-Type Theorem without Hidden Variables’ ”

Henry Pierce Stapp

Foundations of Physics•Jan 1, 2006•5 citations

Comments on Shimony's "An Analysis of Stapp's 'A bell-type theorem without hidden variables'" - eScholarship

Henry Pierce Stapp

•Sep 8, 2004•2 citations

Comments on Shimonyâ¿¿s â¿¿An Analysis of Stappâ¿¿s â¿¿A Bell-Type Theorem without Hidden Variablesâ¿¿ â¿?

Henry Pierce Stapp

•Jan 1, 2006•0 citations

On hidden-variable theories and Bell's inequality

Luis de la Peña, Ana Marı́a Cetto, Thomas A. Brody

Lettere al nuovo cimento della societa italiana di fisica/Lettere al nuovo cimento•Sep 1, 1972•69 citations

Bell's theorem without hidden variables

Philippe H. Eberhard

Il Nuovo cimento della Società italiana di fisica. B/Il Nuovo cimento B•Mar 1, 1977•159 citations

Hidden Variables in Quantum Mechanics from the Perspective of Boltzmannian Statistical Mechanics

Dustin Lazarovici

This paper examines no-hidden-variables theorems in quantum mechanics from the point of view of statistical mechanics. It presents a general analysis of the measurement process in the Boltzmannian framework that leads to a characterization of (in)compatible measurements and reproduces several features of quantum probabilities often described as “non-classical”. The analysis is applied to versions of the Kochen–Specker and Bell theorems to shed more light on their implications. It is shown how, once the measurement device and the active role of the measurement process are taken into account, contextuality appears as a natural feature of random variables. This corroborates Bell’s criticism that no-go results of the Kochen–Specker type are based on gratuitous assumptions. In contrast, Bell-type theorems are much more profound, but should be understood as nonlocality theorems rather than no-hidden-variables theorems. Finally, the paper addresses misunderstandings and misleading terminology that have confused the debate about hidden variables in quantum mechanics.

Quantum Reports•Sep 6, 2024•1 citation
This paper examines no-hidden-variables theorems in quantum mechanics from the point of view of statistical mechanics. It presents a general analysis of the measurement process in the Boltzmannian framework that leads to a characterization of (in)compatible measurements and reproduces several features of quantum probabilities often described as “non-classical”. The analysis is applied to versions of the Kochen–Specker and Bell theorems to shed more light on their implications. It is shown how, once the measurement device and the active role of the measurement process are taken into account, contextuality appears as a natural feature of random variables. This corroborates Bell’s criticism that no-go results of the Kochen–Specker type are based on gratuitous assumptions. In contrast, Bell-type theorems are much more profound, but should be understood as nonlocality theorems rather than no-hidden-variables theorems. Finally, the paper addresses misunderstandings and misleading terminology that have confused the debate about hidden variables in quantum mechanics.