Entropy

Reply to Jay Lawrence. Comments on Piero Quarati et al. Negentropy in Many-Body Quantum Systems. Entropy 2016, 18, 63

P. Quarati, M. Lissia, Antonio Maria Scarfone

Published Apr 7, 2016• 0 citations

Publisher

Abstract

The Comments are explicitly related to contents of two published papers: actual [1] and [2].[...]

DOI: 10.3390/e18040126

Related papers

Comments on Piero Quarati et al. Negentropy in Many-Body Quantum Systems. Entropy 2016, 18, 63

Jay Lawrence

The purpose of this note is to express my concerns about the published paper by Quarati et al. (Entropy 2016, 18, 63). It is hoped that these comments will stimulate a constructive discussion of the issues involved.

EntropyApr 7, 20160 citations

Comments on `Comment on Aurélien Drezet's defense of relational quantum mechanics' by Jay Lawrence, Marcin Markiewicz and Marek Źukowski

Aurélien Drezet

We respond briefly to the recent comment by Jay Lawrence, Marcin Markiewicz and Marek Źukowski [arXiv:2210.09025 and Found. Phys. \textbf{54}, 45 (2024)] regarding our work defending RQM against their previous assessment. We refute the analysis proposed by the authors and rephrase our previous study in order to clarify the remaining ambiguities in our rebuttal.

arXiv:2504.02836Mar 17, 20250 citations

Reply to Comment on: "Fluctuation Theorem for Many-Body Pure Quantum States"

Eiki Iyoda, Kazuya Kaneko, Takahiro Sagawa

We reply to Comment by J. Gemmer, L. Knipschild, R. Steinigeweg (arXiv:1712.02128) on our paper Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 100601 (2017).

arXiv:1712.05172Dec 14, 20171 citation

Reply to "Comment on "On a new definition of quantum entropy""

Michele Campisi

The example provided in the comment [arXiv:0803.2241] concerns a situation where the system is initially at negative temperature. It is known that in such cases the Law of Entropy Decrease holds. Nevertheless, this does not challenge the validity of the Second Law of Thermodynamics.

arXiv:0804.1146Apr 7, 20080 citations

Comment on: "Fluctuation Theorem for Many-Body Pure Quantum States" and Reply to "arXiv:1712.05172"

Jochen Gemmer B, Lars Knipschild, Robin Steinigeweg

We comment on: E. Iyoda, K. Kaneko, and T. Sagawa, "Fluctuation Theorem for Many-Body Pure Quantum States", Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 100601 (2017). We also respond to the reply by the afore mentioned authors: "arXiv:1712.05172". The response at hand concludes our discussion of the subject on the arXiv.

arXiv:1712.02128Dec 6, 20170 citations

Reply to Comment on ‘Gazeau–Klauder cat states’

Jerzy Dajka, J. Łuczka

We reply to the comment by Aleksiejunas on our article Dajka J and Łuczka J 2012 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 45 244006 . We point that the mistake mentioned in the comment is trivial and rather technical and does not influence main physical content of our work.

Journal of Physics A Mathematical and TheoreticalMay 20, 20150 citations