Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical

Reply to Comment on ‘Gazeau–Klauder cat states’

Jerzy Dajka, J. Łuczka

Published May 20, 2015• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

We reply to the comment by Aleksiejunas on our article Dajka J and Łuczka J 2012 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 45 244006 . We point that the mistake mentioned in the comment is trivial and rather technical and does not influence main physical content of our work.
DOI
10.1088/1751-8113/48/23/238002

Related papers

Kaszlikowskiet al.Reply:

Dagomir Kaszlikowski, Aditi Sen, Ujjwal Sen +2 more

A Reply to the Comment by Zbigniew Walczak.Received 25 November 2009DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.068902©2010 American Physical Society

Physical Review Letters•Feb 12, 2010•3 citations

Comment on ‘Gazeau–Klauder cat states’

Rimvydas Aleksiejūnas

Gazeau–Klauder cat states for a nonlinear Kerr oscillator has been investigated by Dajka and Łuczka (2012 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 45 244006 ). We show that their derivation of a geometric phase for cat states contains an error, and the corrected time dependence of the geometric phase exhibits step-like behavior characteristic to quantum geometric phases.

Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical•May 20, 2015•1 citation

Reply to Comment on ‘Critical points of Potts and O( N ) models from eigenvalue identities in periodic Temperley–Lieb algebras’

Jesper Lykke Jacobsen

Abstract The authors replies to the comment made by Yang and Zhou (2024 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. ) on his 2015 paper entitled ‘Critical points of Potts and O( N ) models from eigenvalue identities in periodic Temperley–Lieb algebras’ (Jacobsen 2015 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 48 454003).

Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical•Jun 6, 2024•0 citations

Reply to “Comment on ‘The variational principle and simple properties of the ground-state wave function,’ ” by S. K. Foong, D. Kiang, and Y. Nogami [Am. J. Phys. 71 (7), 731 (2003)]

Jordi Mur-Petit, A. Polls, Ferran Mazzanti

American Journal of Physics•Jun 11, 2003•2 citations

Reply to comment on ‘control landscapes are almost always trap free: a geometric assessment’

Benjamin Russell, Re-Bing Wu, HERSCHEL A. RABITZ

Abstract This paper is a rebuttal of the comment by Zhdanov (2018 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor .) with regard to our paper (Russell et al 2017 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor . 50 205302). Parts of the comment either misrepresent the original claims in Russell et al (2017 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor . 50 205302) or consider issues that go beyond the scope of Russell et al (2017 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor . 50 205302). We address all of these points in the rebuttal. A remaining item about the prospect of an accumulation of null sets was already considered in a prior work (Russell et al 2018 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor . 51 335103). Importantly, the comment fails to consider the vast and continually growing set of successful quantum control tests under well-defined conditions, which serves as foundational evidence for the results in Russell et al (2017 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor . 50 205302). In summary, the remarks in the comment either misconstrue the claims of Russell et al (2017 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor . 50 205302) or raise points that are irrelevant to the goal of the original work. Thus, we conclude that the primary claim of the original paper stands: almost all closed finite dimensional quantum systems are trap free given adequate control resources.

Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical•Oct 31, 2018•12 citations

Bayonget al.Reply:

E. Bayong, H. T. Diep, Victor S Dotsenko

A Reply to the Comment by Katarina Uzelac and Zvonko Glumac.Received 15 November 1999DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.5256©2000 American Physical Society

Physical Review Letters•Dec 11, 2000•2 citations
Abstract This paper is a rebuttal of the comment by Zhdanov (2018 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor .) with regard to our paper (Russell et al 2017 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor . 50 205302). Parts of the comment either misrepresent the original claims in Russell et al (2017 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor . 50 205302) or consider issues that go beyond the scope of Russell et al (2017 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor . 50 205302). We address all of these points in the rebuttal. A remaining item about the prospect of an accumulation of null sets was already considered in a prior work (Russell et al 2018 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor . 51 335103). Importantly, the comment fails to consider the vast and continually growing set of successful quantum control tests under well-defined conditions, which serves as foundational evidence for the results in Russell et al (2017 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor . 50 205302). In summary, the remarks in the comment either misconstrue the claims of Russell et al (2017 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor . 50 205302) or raise points that are irrelevant to the goal of the original work. Thus, we conclude that the primary claim of the original paper stands: almost all closed finite dimensional quantum systems are trap free given adequate control resources.