Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physical Review A

Reply to “Comment on ‘Nonclassicality indicator for the real phase-space distribution functions’ ”

Siamak Khademi, Parvin Sadeghi, S. Nasiri

Published Mar 16, 2016• 5 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Sadeghi et al. [Phys. Rev. A 82, 012102 (2010)] presented a new nonclassicality indicator which works properly for Husimi and Rivier distribution functions as well as the Wigner distribution function. Some objections on the Sadeghi nonclassicality indicator are presented by Kenfack (preceding Comment, ``Nonclassicality indicator for the real phase-space distribution functions'', Phys. Rev. A 93, 036101 (2016). In this Reply, some misconceptions on Sadeghi's nonclassicality indicator are discussed and clarified.

DOI
10.1103/physreva.93.036102

Related papers

Comment on “Nonclassicality indicator for the real phase-space distribution functions”

Anatole Kenfack

We show in this Comment that the nonclassicality indicator proposed in Sadeghi et al. [Phys. Rev. A 82, 012102 (2010)] is controversial. Defined in terms of the interferences displayed by the quasidistribution function of at least two superposition states, this indicator may logically lead to zero for any single quantum state irrespective to its nonclassicality, in contradiction with their results.

Physical Review A•Mar 16, 2016•6 citations

Kenfack – Życzkowski indicator of nonclassicality for two non-equivalent representations of Wigner function of qutrit

Vahagn Abgaryan, A. Khvedelidze, Astghik Torosyan

arXiv:2009.00375•Physics Letters A•Jul 24, 2021•5 citations

Reply to “Comment on ‘Coherent-state path integrals in the continuum’”

G. Kordas, S. I. Mistakidis, A. I. Karanikas

In this Reply we briefly clarify the main points of our method to construct coherent-state path integrals in the continuum and we reply to the critique raised by in the preceding Comment by Kochetov [Phys. Rev. A 99, 026101 (2019)]. By using definite examples, we prove that our approach is capable of resolving the inconsistencies accompanying the standard coherent-state path-integral representation of interacting systems.

Physical Review A•Feb 13, 2019•3 citations

Reply to ‘‘Comment on ‘Quantum chaotic system in the generalized Husimi representation’ ’’

Karol Życzkowski

The interpretation of Milburn in the preceding Comment [Phys. Rev A 39, 2749 (1989)] is confirmed in further numerical study.Received 7 December 1987DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.39.2751©1989 American Physical Society

Physical Review A•Mar 1, 1989•1 citation

Comment on “Nonclassical States: An Observable Criterion”

Lajos Diósi

A Comment on the Letter by Werner Vogel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 1849 (2000). The authors of the Letter offer a Reply.Received 14 April 2000DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.2841©2000 American Physical Society

Physical Review Letters•Sep 1, 2000•24 citations

Comment on “Wigner phase-space distribution function for the hydrogen atom”

Jens Peder Dahl, Michael Springborg

We object to the proposal that the mapping of the three-dimensional hydrogen atom into a four-dimensional harmonic oscillator can be readily used to determine the Wigner phase-space distribution function for the hydrogen atom.

Physical Review A•May 1, 1999•7 citations
Sadeghi et al. [Phys. Rev. A 82, 012102 (2010)] presented a new nonclassicality indicator which works properly for Husimi and Rivier distribution functions as well as the Wigner distribution function. Some objections on the Sadeghi nonclassicality indicator are presented by Kenfack (preceding Comment, ``Nonclassicality indicator for the real phase-space distribution functions'', Phys. Rev. A 93, 036101 (2016). In this Reply, some misconceptions on Sadeghi's nonclassicality indicator are discussed and clarified.