Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems

On the Lagrangian structure of quantum fluid models

Philipp Fuchs, Ansgar Jüngel, Max von Renesse

Published Oct 3, 2013• 8 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Some quantum fluid models are written as the Lagrangian flow of mass distributionsand their geometric properties are explored. The first model includes magnetic effectsand leads, via the Madelung transform,to the electromagnetic Schrödinger equation in the Madelung representation.It is shown that the Madelung transform is a symplectic map between Hamiltoniansystems. The second model is obtained from the Euler-Lagrange equations withfriction induced from a quadratic dissipative potential. This model corresponds to thequantum Navier-Stokes equations with density-dependent viscosity. The fact thatthis model possesses two different energy-dissipation identities is explainedby the definition of the Noether currents.

DOI
10.3934/dcds.2014.34.1375

Related papers

Quantum wave representation of dissipative fluids

Luca Salasnich, Sauro Succi A, Adriano Tiribocchi

We present a mapping between a Schrödinger equation with a shifted nonlinear potential and the Navier–Stokes equation. Following a generalization of the Madelung transformations, we show that the inclusion of the Bohm quantum potential plus the laplacian of the phase field in the nonlinear term leads to continuity and momentum equations for a dissipative incompressible Navier–Stokes fluid. An alternative solution, built using a complex quantum diffusion, is also discussed. The present models may capture dissipative effects in quantum fluids, such as Bose–Einstein condensates, as well as facilitate the formulation of quantum algorithms for classical dissipative fluids.

arXiv:2308.05879•International Journal of Modern Physics C•Dec 27, 2023•9 citations

The symplectic geometrical formulation of quantum hydrodynamics

Andika Kusuma Wijaya, Arief Hermanto, Muhammad Farchani Rosyid

Quantum hydrodynamics described by Madelung equations is analyzed in the framework of symplectic geometry i.e. in covariant phase space approach to geometric field theory. The pre-symplectic manifolds providing the phase spaces describing the Hamiltonian dynamics of quantum fluid are constructed from the set of all solutions of Madelung equations and their corresponding Lagrangian densities. The Madelung equations under consideration are the Madelung equations associated to Schroedinger equations (in the nonrelativistic case) and Madelung equations associated to Klein–Gordon equations (in the relativistic case). The cases where the coupling with electromagnetic fields is present are also considered here. Our symplectic formulation is different from that of [M. Spera, Moment map and gauge geometric aspects of the Schrodinger and Pauli equations, Int. J. Geom. Methods Mod. Phys. 13 (2016) 1–36] in the choice of fundamental fields or variables. Here we regard density function [Formula: see text] and phase function [Formula: see text] not as canonical pair but as the fundamental fields of the theory. The Hamiltonian vector fields corresponding to an observable are obtained from the Hamiltonian equation generated by the observable. The Poisson bracket of two observables then is determined by the Hamiltonian vector fields associated to each observable. In general, the Poisson bracket of two observables is not unique due to the fact that every observable has more than one corresponding Hamiltonian vector field. It is pointed out that the Poisson bracket has a unique value over a certain subset of the set of all observables defined on the pre-symplectic manifold of the Madelung equation under consideration.

International Journal of Geometric Methods in Modern Physics•Jul 1, 2022•3 citations

Rendering the Navier–Stokes Equations for a Compressible Fluid into the Schrödinger Equation for Quantum Mechanics

Péter Vadász

The mass and momentum transfer phenomena in a compressible fluid represented by the Navier–Stokes equations are shown to convert into the Schrödinger equation for quantum mechanics. The complete Navier–Stokes equations render into an extended generalized version of Schrödinger equation. These results complement the Madelung’s (Zeitschrift für Physik 40 (3–4), pp. 322–326, 1926–1927) derivations that show how Schrödinger’s equation in quantum mechanics can be converted into the Euler equations for irrotational compressible flow. The theoretical results presented here join the classical Madelung paper to suggest the possibility that quantum effects at sub-atomic levels deal with a compressible fluid susceptible to wave propagation, rather than a particle. The link between such a fluid and the “quantum particle” is under current investigation.

Fluids•Jun 13, 2016•14 citations

- Symmetries and Conservation Laws in the Lagrangian Picture of Quantum Hydrodynamics

Swapan Kumar Ghosh, Pratim Kumar Chattaraj

The similarity in form between the two real equations implied by the single-body spin-0 Schrödinger equation in the position representation (wave mechanics) and the equations of fluid mechanics with potential flow in its Eulerian formulation was first pointed out by Madelung in 1926 [1]. In this analogy, the probability density is proportional to the fluid density, and the phase of the wave function is a velocity potential. A novel feature of the quantum fluid is the appearance of quantum stresses, which are usually represented through the quantum potential. To achieve mathematical equivalence of the models, the hydrodynamic variables have to satisfy 4.1 Introduction .................................................................................................... 55 4.2 Deduction of Schrödinger’s Equation from the Lagrangian Picture Trajectory Theory ........................................................................................... 57 4.2.1 Lagrangian Picture ............................................................................. 57 4.2.2 Eulerian Picture .................................................................................. 62 4.2.3 Equivalence of First-Order and Second-Order Trajectory Laws ........64

CRC Press eBooks•Apr 19, 2016•2 citations

Finslerian geometrization of quantum mechanics in the hydrodynamical representation

Shi‐Dong Liang, Sorin V. Sabău, Tiberiu Harko

We consider a Finslerian-type geometrization of the nonrelativistic quantum mechanics in its hydrodynamical (Madelung) formulation, by also taking into account the effects of the presence of the electromagnetic fields on the particle motion. In the Madelung representation, the Schr\"odinger equation can be reformulated as the classical continuity and Euler equations of classical fluid mechanics in the presence of a quantum potential, representing the quantum hydrodynamical evolution equations. The equation of particle motion can then be obtained from a Lagrangian similarly to its classical counterpart. After the reparametrization of the Lagrangian, it turns out that the Finsler metric describing the geometric properties of quantum hydrodynamics is a Kropina metric. We present and discuss in detail the metric and the geodesic equations describing the geometric properties of the quantum motion in the presence of electromagnetic fields. As an application of the obtained formalism, we consider the Zermelo navigation problem in a quantum hydrodynamical system, whose solution is given by a Kropina metric. The case of the Finsler geometrization of the quantum hydrodynamical motion of spinless particles in the absence of electromagnetic interactions is also considered in detail, and the Zermelo navigation problem for this case is also discussed.

arXiv:1910.14114•Physical review. D/Physical review. D.•Nov 18, 2019•12 citations

A formulation of quantum fluid mechanics and trajectories

James P. Finley

Abstract A formalism of classical mechanics is given for time-dependent many-body states of quantum mechanics, describing both fluid flow and point mass trajectories. The familiar equations of energy, motion, and those of Lagrangian mechanics are obtained. An energy and continuity equation is demonstrated to be equivalent to the real and imaginary parts of the time dependent Schrödinger equation, respectively, where the Schrödinger equation is in density matrix form. For certain stationary states, using Lagrangian mechanics and a Hamiltonian function for quantum mechanics, equations for point-mass trajectories are obtained. For 1-body states and fluid flows, the energy equation and equations of motion are the Bernoulli and Euler equations of fluid mechanics, respectively. Generalizations of the energy and Euler equations are derived to obtain equations that are in the same form as they are in classical mechanics. The fluid flow type is compressible, inviscid, irrotational, with the nonclassical element of local variable mass. Over all space mass is conserved. The variable mass is a necessary condition for the fluid flow to agree with the zero orbital angular momentum for s states of hydrogen. Cross flows are examined, where velocity directions are changed without changing the kinetic energy. For one-electron atoms, the velocity modification gives closed orbits for trajectories, and mass conservation, vortexes, and density stratification for fluid flows. For many body states, under certain conditions, and by hypotheses, Euler equations of orbital-flows are obtained. One-body Schrödinger equations that are a generalization of the Hartree–Fock equations are also obtained. These equations contain a quantum Coulomb’s law, involving the 2-body pair function of reduced density matrix theory that replace the charge densities.

arXiv:2405.01486•Physica Scripta•Jul 17, 2024•0 citations
Some quantum fluid models are written as the Lagrangian flow of mass distributionsand their geometric properties are explored. The first model includes magnetic effectsand leads, via the Madelung transform,to the electromagnetic Schrödinger equation in the Madelung representation.It is shown that the Madelung transform is a symplectic map between Hamiltoniansystems. The second model is obtained from the Euler-Lagrange equations withfriction induced from a quadratic dissipative potential. This model corresponds to thequantum Navier-Stokes equations with density-dependent viscosity. The fact thatthis model possesses two different energy-dissipation identities is explainedby the definition of the Noether currents.
We present a mapping between a Schrödinger equation with a shifted nonlinear potential and the Navier–Stokes equation. Following a generalization of the Madelung transformations, we show that the inclusion of the Bohm quantum potential plus the laplacian of the phase field in the nonlinear term leads to continuity and momentum equations for a dissipative incompressible Navier–Stokes fluid. An alternative solution, built using a complex quantum diffusion, is also discussed. The present models may capture dissipative effects in quantum fluids, such as Bose–Einstein condensates, as well as facilitate the formulation of quantum algorithms for classical dissipative fluids.
Quantum hydrodynamics described by Madelung equations is analyzed in the framework of symplectic geometry i.e. in covariant phase space approach to geometric field theory. The pre-symplectic manifolds providing the phase spaces describing the Hamiltonian dynamics of quantum fluid are constructed from the set of all solutions of Madelung equations and their corresponding Lagrangian densities. The Madelung equations under consideration are the Madelung equations associated to Schroedinger equations (in the nonrelativistic case) and Madelung equations associated to Klein–Gordon equations (in the relativistic case). The cases where the coupling with electromagnetic fields is present are also considered here. Our symplectic formulation is different from that of [M. Spera, Moment map and gauge geometric aspects of the Schrodinger and Pauli equations, Int. J. Geom. Methods Mod. Phys. 13 (2016) 1–36] in the choice of fundamental fields or variables. Here we regard density function [Formula: see text] and phase function [Formula: see text] not as canonical pair but as the fundamental fields of the theory. The Hamiltonian vector fields corresponding to an observable are obtained from the Hamiltonian equation generated by the observable. The Poisson bracket of two observables then is determined by the Hamiltonian vector fields associated to each observable. In general, the Poisson bracket of two observables is not unique due to the fact that every observable has more than one corresponding Hamiltonian vector field. It is pointed out that the Poisson bracket has a unique value over a certain subset of the set of all observables defined on the pre-symplectic manifold of the Madelung equation under consideration.
The mass and momentum transfer phenomena in a compressible fluid represented by the Navier–Stokes equations are shown to convert into the Schrödinger equation for quantum mechanics. The complete Navier–Stokes equations render into an extended generalized version of Schrödinger equation. These results complement the Madelung’s (Zeitschrift für Physik 40 (3–4), pp. 322–326, 1926–1927) derivations that show how Schrödinger’s equation in quantum mechanics can be converted into the Euler equations for irrotational compressible flow. The theoretical results presented here join the classical Madelung paper to suggest the possibility that quantum effects at sub-atomic levels deal with a compressible fluid susceptible to wave propagation, rather than a particle. The link between such a fluid and the “quantum particle” is under current investigation.
The similarity in form between the two real equations implied by the single-body spin-0 Schrödinger equation in the position representation (wave mechanics) and the equations of fluid mechanics with potential flow in its Eulerian formulation was first pointed out by Madelung in 1926 [1]. In this analogy, the probability density is proportional to the fluid density, and the phase of the wave function is a velocity potential. A novel feature of the quantum fluid is the appearance of quantum stresses, which are usually represented through the quantum potential. To achieve mathematical equivalence of the models, the hydrodynamic variables have to satisfy 4.1 Introduction .................................................................................................... 55 4.2 Deduction of Schrödinger’s Equation from the Lagrangian Picture Trajectory Theory ........................................................................................... 57 4.2.1 Lagrangian Picture ............................................................................. 57 4.2.2 Eulerian Picture .................................................................................. 62 4.2.3 Equivalence of First-Order and Second-Order Trajectory Laws ........64
We consider a Finslerian-type geometrization of the nonrelativistic quantum mechanics in its hydrodynamical (Madelung) formulation, by also taking into account the effects of the presence of the electromagnetic fields on the particle motion. In the Madelung representation, the Schr\"odinger equation can be reformulated as the classical continuity and Euler equations of classical fluid mechanics in the presence of a quantum potential, representing the quantum hydrodynamical evolution equations. The equation of particle motion can then be obtained from a Lagrangian similarly to its classical counterpart. After the reparametrization of the Lagrangian, it turns out that the Finsler metric describing the geometric properties of quantum hydrodynamics is a Kropina metric. We present and discuss in detail the metric and the geodesic equations describing the geometric properties of the quantum motion in the presence of electromagnetic fields. As an application of the obtained formalism, we consider the Zermelo navigation problem in a quantum hydrodynamical system, whose solution is given by a Kropina metric. The case of the Finsler geometrization of the quantum hydrodynamical motion of spinless particles in the absence of electromagnetic interactions is also considered in detail, and the Zermelo navigation problem for this case is also discussed.
Abstract A formalism of classical mechanics is given for time-dependent many-body states of quantum mechanics, describing both fluid flow and point mass trajectories. The familiar equations of energy, motion, and those of Lagrangian mechanics are obtained. An energy and continuity equation is demonstrated to be equivalent to the real and imaginary parts of the time dependent Schrödinger equation, respectively, where the Schrödinger equation is in density matrix form. For certain stationary states, using Lagrangian mechanics and a Hamiltonian function for quantum mechanics, equations for point-mass trajectories are obtained. For 1-body states and fluid flows, the energy equation and equations of motion are the Bernoulli and Euler equations of fluid mechanics, respectively. Generalizations of the energy and Euler equations are derived to obtain equations that are in the same form as they are in classical mechanics. The fluid flow type is compressible, inviscid, irrotational, with the nonclassical element of local variable mass. Over all space mass is conserved. The variable mass is a necessary condition for the fluid flow to agree with the zero orbital angular momentum for s states of hydrogen. Cross flows are examined, where velocity directions are changed without changing the kinetic energy. For one-electron atoms, the velocity modification gives closed orbits for trajectories, and mass conservation, vortexes, and density stratification for fluid flows. For many body states, under certain conditions, and by hypotheses, Euler equations of orbital-flows are obtained. One-body Schrödinger equations that are a generalization of the Hartree–Fock equations are also obtained. These equations contain a quantum Coulomb’s law, involving the 2-body pair function of reduced density matrix theory that replace the charge densities.