Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Soryushiron Kenkyu/Soryushiron kenkyu

Quantum Mechanics of a Particle Confined to a Curved Surface

Shin Takagi

Published Dec 20, 1996• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

Quantum Mechanics of a Particle Confined to a Curved Surface

伸 高木

素粒子論研究•Jan 1, 1996•0 citations

Quantum particle confined to a thin-layer volume: Non-uniform convergence toward the curved surface

Yong-Long Wang, Hong-Shi Zong

arXiv:1502.02110•Annals of Physics•Nov 5, 2015•38 citations

Quantum mechanics of a particle on a curved surface

充宏 池上

•Jan 1, 1993•7 citations

Quantum mechanics of a fermion confined to a curved surface in Foldy-Wouthuysen representation

Hao Zhao, Yong-Long Wang, Cheng-Zhi Ye +3 more

In Foldy-Wouthuysen representation, this paper deduces the effective quantum mechanics for a relativistic particle confined to a curved surface in an external field by using the thin-layer quantization scheme. It is found that the quantum effects caused by introducing the confining potential can be taken as the results of relativistic correction in the nonrelativistic limit. Meanwhile, the spin connection of the curved surface can produce a Zeeman-like gap through the relativistic correction term. In addition, the confining potential can provide a curvature-independent energy shift resulting from the Zitterbewegung effect. As an example, this paper applies the effective Hamiltonian to a torus surface, in which the spin effects related to the introduced confining potential are obtained. These results demonstrate the scaling of the noncommutation of the nonrelativistic limit and the thin-layer quantization procedure.

arXiv:2111.14058•Physical Review A•May 25, 2022•8 citations

Quantum Mechanics of a Particle on a Curved Surface

Mitsuhiro Ikegami, Yosuke Nagaoka, Shin Takagi +1 more

When quantum mechanical motion of a particle constrained to a curved surface in the Euclidean space is considered, three different approaches may be adopted to describe the system. One is the confining approach which enforces a particle to stay in the surface by a physical confining potential. Both of the others follow Dirac's general prescription to treat a constrained system, but employ different constraints, namely the usual and the conservative constraints, respectively. The three approaches lead to results which do not in general agree with each other, though they give the same classical equation of motion. It is emphasized that the arbitrariness in the ordering of operators cannot be avoided when the latter two approaches are adopted. In the approach with the conservative constraint, however, there is a physical ordering, which leads to the result in agreement with that of the confining approach. We interpret these discrepancy and agreement in simple physical terms.

Progress of Theoretical Physics•Aug 1, 1992•13 citations

Quantum Mechanics of a Particle on a Curved Surface: Comparison of Three Different Approaches

Mitsuhiro Ikegami, Yasutaka Nagaoka, Shuji Takagi +1 more

When quantum mechanical motion of a particle constrained to a curved surface in the Euclidean space is considered, three different approaches may be adopted to describe the system. One is the confining approach which enforces a particle to stay in the surface by a physical confining potential. Both of the others follow Dirac's general prescription to treat a constrained system, but employ different constraints, namely the usual and the conservative constraints, respectively. The three approaches lead to results which do not in general agree with each other, though they give the same classical equation of motion. It is emphasized that the arbitrariness in the ordering of operators cannot be avoided when the latter two approaches are adopted. In the approach with the conservative constraint, however, there is a physical ordering, which leads to the result in agreement with that of the confining approach. We interpret these discrepancy and agreement in simple physical terms.

Progress of Theoretical Physics•Aug 1, 1992•53 citations
In Foldy-Wouthuysen representation, this paper deduces the effective quantum mechanics for a relativistic particle confined to a curved surface in an external field by using the thin-layer quantization scheme. It is found that the quantum effects caused by introducing the confining potential can be taken as the results of relativistic correction in the nonrelativistic limit. Meanwhile, the spin connection of the curved surface can produce a Zeeman-like gap through the relativistic correction term. In addition, the confining potential can provide a curvature-independent energy shift resulting from the Zitterbewegung effect. As an example, this paper applies the effective Hamiltonian to a torus surface, in which the spin effects related to the introduced confining potential are obtained. These results demonstrate the scaling of the noncommutation of the nonrelativistic limit and the thin-layer quantization procedure.
When quantum mechanical motion of a particle constrained to a curved surface in the Euclidean space is considered, three different approaches may be adopted to describe the system. One is the confining approach which enforces a particle to stay in the surface by a physical confining potential. Both of the others follow Dirac's general prescription to treat a constrained system, but employ different constraints, namely the usual and the conservative constraints, respectively. The three approaches lead to results which do not in general agree with each other, though they give the same classical equation of motion. It is emphasized that the arbitrariness in the ordering of operators cannot be avoided when the latter two approaches are adopted. In the approach with the conservative constraint, however, there is a physical ordering, which leads to the result in agreement with that of the confining approach. We interpret these discrepancy and agreement in simple physical terms.
When quantum mechanical motion of a particle constrained to a curved surface in the Euclidean space is considered, three different approaches may be adopted to describe the system. One is the confining approach which enforces a particle to stay in the surface by a physical confining potential. Both of the others follow Dirac's general prescription to treat a constrained system, but employ different constraints, namely the usual and the conservative constraints, respectively. The three approaches lead to results which do not in general agree with each other, though they give the same classical equation of motion. It is emphasized that the arbitrariness in the ordering of operators cannot be avoided when the latter two approaches are adopted. In the approach with the conservative constraint, however, there is a physical ordering, which leads to the result in agreement with that of the confining approach. We interpret these discrepancy and agreement in simple physical terms.