Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Optics Express

Introduction

Howard R. Reiss

Published Mar 30, 1998• 10 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Most of atomic physics is concerned with the behavior of valence electrons, where energies are of the order of the square of the fine structure constant (alpha approximately 1/137) times the rest energy of the electron, mc(2). Well-known relativistic corrections, such as fine splitting of energy levels, are smaller than usual atomic transition energies by two extra powers of the fine structure constant, and are even smaller for hyperfine splitting. In valence-electron atomic physics, therefore, relativistic effects are normally treated as small corrections.

DOI
10.1364/oe.2.000261

Related papers

Low energy scattering of atoms by atoms or molecules, 1. Relativistic effects in atoms, 2. Laser-atom interactions, 3

Marvin H. Mittleman

•Jan 1, 1975•0 citations

Calculation of fine-structure splittings in high-lying F2 states of rubidium

Steven A. Blundell

We present relativistic many-body calculations of the fine-structure splittings of the $n\phantom{\rule{0.16em}{0ex}}{}^{2}F$ Rydberg states of Rb $(n=4$--16) using both order-by-order relativistic many-body perturbation theory (RMBPT), up to a subset of fourth-order corrections, and relativistic equation-of-motion coupled-cluster methods, including singles, doubles, and an approximate treatment of valence triples. Good overall agreement is found with the measurements of Brandenberger et al. [Phys. Rev. A 65, 042510 (2002); Phys. Rev. A 81, 032515 (2010)] to better than the 1% level, which is our expected level of theoretical uncertainty due to omitted higher-order correlation effects. It is shown that the RMBPT of the fine-structure splittings is complex and slowly convergent, and that relativistic effects are enhanced compared with the RMBPT of the ionization energy of the $^{2}\mathrm{F}$ states. We also analyze smaller field-theoretic contributions to the fine-structure splittings from retardation and the radiative self-energy and vacuum polarization, finding them to enter at the 0.1% level.

Physical Review A•Oct 31, 2014•7 citations

Relativistic corrections to the binding energy of positronic alkali-metal atoms

Takuma Yamashita, Yasushi Kino

We report a theoretical calculation of the relativistic corrections to the binding energy of positronic alkali-metal atoms. The ground state for the positronic alkali-metal atom is a loosely bound state with the structure of an alkali-metal ion surrounded by a positronium cloud. The correlation between the valence electron and positron in the field of a residual core ion is taken into account using a three-body model. Relativistic corrections to the binding energy for positronic alkali-metal atoms are evaluated based on the Breit-Pauli perturbation theory up to the second order of the fine structure constant. The relativistic corrections caused by the interaction between the valence electron and core ion was evaluated from the decomposed expectation values of the perturbation Hamiltonian. We found that the importance of relativistic corrections to the binding energy, namely the ratio of the net relativistic correction in the total binding energy, is remarkably enhanced in the loosely bound states of positronic alkali-metal atoms, where the charge of the valence electron is screened by the positron as positronium in the outermost region, while the electron is released from the positron near the nucleus. The results imply that positronic atoms with a dominant positronium can serve as an apt testing ground for relativistic quantum mechanics.

Physical Review A•Dec 17, 2019•7 citations

Relativistic Corrections to the Energy of the Electron in a Hydrogenlike Atom

В. В. Скобелев

Russian Physics Journal•Nov 1, 2017•2 citations

Atomes dans un faisceau lumineux ou dans le vide de photons

Claude N. Cohen-Tannoudji

An atomic electron, in the vacuum of photons, can emit and reabsorb photons of any frequency. Such processes give rise to well known radiative corrections (Lamb—shift, g — 2, natural width of excited states...). We review in this paper similar effects which can be induced by the interaction of an atomic electron with an incident electromagnetic wave, and we try to get some physical insight in radiative processes by comparing these two types of « spontaneous » and « induced » effects. Optical pumping methods have been very useful for studying how atoms are perturbed by optical or RF photons. The Zeeman sublevels of an atomic ground state are broadened and shifted by a resonant or quasiresonant optical irradiation. The corresponding light-shifts (or « Lamp-shifts » as A. Kastler called them) are due to virtual absorptions and reemissions of incident photons. Another example of an induced effect is the modification of the magnetic properties of an atomic level due to a high frequency non resonant RF irradiation. The Larmor precession is slowed down and becomes anisotropic. The two previous examples correspond to two situations leading to simple calculations. For a resonant or quasiresonant excitation, a single atomic transition needs to be considered. Non perturbative treatments can be given which include the effect of the atom field coupling to all orders. For example, the « dressed atom » approach allows a unified treatment of various effects such as light shifts, Autler-Townes doublets resonance fluorescence triplets... On the other hand, for a high frequency irradiation, all atomic transitions must be included. It is possible in this case to derive an effective hamiltonian describing, to lowest order in the fine structure constant α, how electronic energy levels are perturbed in the presence of N photons ω. The remaining part of the paper is devoted to the analysis of such a situation. The terms of the effective hamiltonian proportional to the number N of incident photons correspond to the induced effects. They can be fully interpreted in semiclassical terms and they describe how the slow motion of the electron in the external static fields is modified by the high frequency vibration in the incident monochromatic wave. For example, the vibrating electron averages the static potential over a finite length, the angular oscillation of the spin reduces the effective magnetic moment. The remaining terms, which are independent of N, exist even in the vacuum of photons (N = 0) and describe the contribution of the mode ω to spontaneous radiative corrections. It is possible to split them into two parts. The first one has the same structure as the N-dependent terms, with N replaced by 1/2. It describes the corrections due to the vibration of the electron in vacuum fluctuations which have a spectral power density ħω/2 per mode. The second part represents the effect of radiation reaction, i.e. the interaction of the electron with its self field. Such an interpretation is confirmed by a Heisenberg equations approach where the total force acting upon the electron is split into two physical (i.e. hermitian) parts representing respectively the effect of the vacuum « free » field and the effect of the « source » field produced by the electron itself. These considerations are finally applied to the problem of the positive sign of g - 2. The g-factor can be written as 2 ωL/ωc, where ω L is the Larmor frequency of the spin and ωc the cyclotron frequency of the charge for an electron in a weak static field B 0. In the absence of radiative corrections, g = 2, and ω L = ωc. To lowest order in 1/c (order zero), radiation reaction slows down ωc but not ωL (a charge is more coupled to its self field than a magnetic moment). The effect of vacuum fluctuations appears only at order 2 in 1/c and corresponds to relativistic and magnetic effects which slow down both ωL and ωc. Therefore, it appears that, in the non relativistic domain, the main effect is a reduction of ωc by radiation reaction and this explains why 2 ωL/ωc becomes larger than 2. A complete relativistic calculation (to all orders in 1/ c, but to lowest order in α) does not change this conclusion since the contribution of non relativistic modes (ħω < mc2) is predominant in the integral giving g — 2.

Annales de Physique•Jan 1, 1985•0 citations

Energy level shifts and transition probabilities in a relativistic atom

Mikhail Aleksandrovich Braun

Theoretical and Mathematical Physics•Jun 1, 1984•4 citations
Most of atomic physics is concerned with the behavior of valence electrons, where energies are of the order of the square of the fine structure constant (alpha approximately 1/137) times the rest energy of the electron, mc(2). Well-known relativistic corrections, such as fine splitting of energy levels, are smaller than usual atomic transition energies by two extra powers of the fine structure constant, and are even smaller for hyperfine splitting. In valence-electron atomic physics, therefore, relativistic effects are normally treated as small corrections.
We present relativistic many-body calculations of the fine-structure splittings of the n2Fn\phantom{\rule{0.16em}{0ex}}{}^{2}Fn2F Rydberg states of Rb (n=4(n=4(n=4--16) using both order-by-order relativistic many-body perturbation theory (RMBPT), up to a subset of fourth-order corrections, and relativistic equation-of-motion coupled-cluster methods, including singles, doubles, and an approximate treatment of valence triples. Good overall agreement is found with the measurements of Brandenberger et al. [Phys. Rev. A 65, 042510 (2002); Phys. Rev. A 81, 032515 (2010)] to better than the 1% level, which is our expected level of theoretical uncertainty due to omitted higher-order correlation effects. It is shown that the RMBPT of the fine-structure splittings is complex and slowly convergent, and that relativistic effects are enhanced compared with the RMBPT of the ionization energy of the 2F^{2}\mathrm{F}2F states. We also analyze smaller field-theoretic contributions to the fine-structure splittings from retardation and the radiative self-energy and vacuum polarization, finding them to enter at the 0.1% level.
We report a theoretical calculation of the relativistic corrections to the binding energy of positronic alkali-metal atoms. The ground state for the positronic alkali-metal atom is a loosely bound state with the structure of an alkali-metal ion surrounded by a positronium cloud. The correlation between the valence electron and positron in the field of a residual core ion is taken into account using a three-body model. Relativistic corrections to the binding energy for positronic alkali-metal atoms are evaluated based on the Breit-Pauli perturbation theory up to the second order of the fine structure constant. The relativistic corrections caused by the interaction between the valence electron and core ion was evaluated from the decomposed expectation values of the perturbation Hamiltonian. We found that the importance of relativistic corrections to the binding energy, namely the ratio of the net relativistic correction in the total binding energy, is remarkably enhanced in the loosely bound states of positronic alkali-metal atoms, where the charge of the valence electron is screened by the positron as positronium in the outermost region, while the electron is released from the positron near the nucleus. The results imply that positronic atoms with a dominant positronium can serve as an apt testing ground for relativistic quantum mechanics.
An atomic electron, in the vacuum of photons, can emit and reabsorb photons of any frequency. Such processes give rise to well known radiative corrections (Lamb—shift, g — 2, natural width of excited states...). We review in this paper similar effects which can be induced by the interaction of an atomic electron with an incident electromagnetic wave, and we try to get some physical insight in radiative processes by comparing these two types of « spontaneous » and « induced » effects. Optical pumping methods have been very useful for studying how atoms are perturbed by optical or RF photons. The Zeeman sublevels of an atomic ground state are broadened and shifted by a resonant or quasiresonant optical irradiation. The corresponding light-shifts (or « Lamp-shifts » as A. Kastler called them) are due to virtual absorptions and reemissions of incident photons. Another example of an induced effect is the modification of the magnetic properties of an atomic level due to a high frequency non resonant RF irradiation. The Larmor precession is slowed down and becomes anisotropic. The two previous examples correspond to two situations leading to simple calculations. For a resonant or quasiresonant excitation, a single atomic transition needs to be considered. Non perturbative treatments can be given which include the effect of the atom field coupling to all orders. For example, the « dressed atom » approach allows a unified treatment of various effects such as light shifts, Autler-Townes doublets resonance fluorescence triplets... On the other hand, for a high frequency irradiation, all atomic transitions must be included. It is possible in this case to derive an effective hamiltonian describing, to lowest order in the fine structure constant α, how electronic energy levels are perturbed in the presence of N photons ω. The remaining part of the paper is devoted to the analysis of such a situation. The terms of the effective hamiltonian proportional to the number N of incident photons correspond to the induced effects. They can be fully interpreted in semiclassical terms and they describe how the slow motion of the electron in the external static fields is modified by the high frequency vibration in the incident monochromatic wave. For example, the vibrating electron averages the static potential over a finite length, the angular oscillation of the spin reduces the effective magnetic moment. The remaining terms, which are independent of N, exist even in the vacuum of photons (N = 0) and describe the contribution of the mode ω to spontaneous radiative corrections. It is possible to split them into two parts. The first one has the same structure as the N-dependent terms, with N replaced by 1/2. It describes the corrections due to the vibration of the electron in vacuum fluctuations which have a spectral power density ħω/2 per mode. The second part represents the effect of radiation reaction, i.e. the interaction of the electron with its self field. Such an interpretation is confirmed by a Heisenberg equations approach where the total force acting upon the electron is split into two physical (i.e. hermitian) parts representing respectively the effect of the vacuum « free » field and the effect of the « source » field produced by the electron itself. These considerations are finally applied to the problem of the positive sign of g - 2. The g-factor can be written as 2 ωL/ωc, where ω L is the Larmor frequency of the spin and ωc the cyclotron frequency of the charge for an electron in a weak static field B 0. In the absence of radiative corrections, g = 2, and ω L = ωc. To lowest order in 1/c (order zero), radiation reaction slows down ωc but not ωL (a charge is more coupled to its self field than a magnetic moment). The effect of vacuum fluctuations appears only at order 2 in 1/c and corresponds to relativistic and magnetic effects which slow down both ωL and ωc. Therefore, it appears that, in the non relativistic domain, the main effect is a reduction of ωc by radiation reaction and this explains why 2 ωL/ωc becomes larger than 2. A complete relativistic calculation (to all orders in 1/ c, but to lowest order in α) does not change this conclusion since the contribution of non relativistic modes (ħω < mc2) is predominant in the integral giving g — 2.