Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Cambridge University Press eBooks

Dynamical Evolution

Enrico G. Beltrametti, Gianni Cassinelli, Peter Carruthers

Published Dec 28, 1984• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

The Unitary Dynamical Group in Schrödinger's Picture Up to now we have been concerned with the description of a physical system at a fixed instant of time. The time evolution of quantum systems constitutes a many-faced, wide issue which, however, is somewhat tangential to the main aim of this volume. We shall touch upon it only briefly, restricting ourselves to the more familiar aspects of the problem. We assume, to begin with, that the physical system has no superselection rules, so that states and physical quantities correspond one-to-one to density operators and self-adjoint operators, respectively, on the Hilbert space. To describe the dynamical evolution of the system one has to specify the way the representatives of states and physical quantities evolve in, which is fixed in time, since the physical system is supposed to preserve its identity. There is an old tenet according to which there are two kinds of time evolution: the discontinuous, nondeterministic evolution undergone by the quantum system when a measurement is made on it, and the continuous, deterministic evolution caused by the interaction with external forces or with other quantum systems. The first kind of evolution will be dealt with in Chapter 8, where we shall find it less alarming than is often claimed.

DOI
10.1017/cbo9781107340725.011

Related papers

Quantum Dynamics and Pictures

Z. Ficek

This chapter demonstrates how one can find the time evolution of the operators from the knowledge of the time evolution of the state vector, and vice versa. It introduces a unitary operator and discusses the concept of a unitary transformation to show how one could transfer the time dependence from the state vectors to the operators. The possibility that either the state vectors or the operators can depend explicitly on time will lead to introduce the Schrodinger, Heisenberg, and interaction pictures. The chapter discusses the fundamental differences between these pictures. It also discusses the Ehrenfest theorem, which shows under which conditions quantum mechanics predicts the same results for measured physical quantities as classical physics. It illustrates unitary transformations of an arbitrary operator Â(t) which can depend explicitly on time. Quantum mechanics produces the same result as classical mechanics for a system in which particles are represented by well-localized wave functions.

•Mar 3, 2017•0 citations

Time-Evolution as an Operator in Hilbert Spaces with Applications in Quantum Mechanics

Amit Kumar Choudhary, S Musa, S. M Nengem +1 more

ABSTRACT: The main aim of this article is to present the time-evolution as the unitary and self-adjoint operators on Hilbert spaces and to describe its application in the development of quantum mechanics. The initial value problems associated with the quantum mechanical Schrodinger equation, ( ) = ( ) in the Hilbert space is solved by the use of timeevolution. The importance of time-evolution is also seen as the operation of turning machine in quantum mechanics, which is regarded as the time-evolution of the machine control state. Time-evolution of a quantum mechanical system is observed to be unitary and self-adjoint operators of Hilbert space, since it corresponds to an observable, specifically energy position and momentum. It was observed that time-evolution of a quantum mechanical system is generated by a self-adjoint operator, called Hamiltonian, V K H ˆ ˆ ˆ   , expressed by the Schrodinger equation, above.

International Journal of Mathematics Trends and Technology•Jun 25, 2014•0 citations

Dynamical Mappings of Density Operators in Quantum Mechanics. II. Time Dependent Mappings

Thomas F. Jordan, Mark A. Pinsky, E. C. G. Sudarshan

The most general continuous time-dependent evolution of a physical system is represented by a continuous one-parameter semi-group of linear mappings of density operators to density operators. It is shown that if these dynamical mappings form a group they can be represented by a group of unitary operators on the Hilbert space of state vectors. This proof does not assume that the absolute values of inner products of state vectors or ``transition probabilities'' are preserved but deduces this fact from the requirement that density operators are mapped linearly to density operators. An example is given of a continuous one-parameter semi-group of dynamical mappings which is not a group.

Journal of Mathematical Physics•Sep 1, 1962•24 citations

Time Evolution

Tilak Sinha

In this chapter, we finally introduce time evolution. The development is carried out for finite, enumerable systems (i.e., systems whose states live in a finite dimensional, inner product space) which, of course, allows a straight forward extension to the continuum and infinite dimensional state spaces. The necessary mathematical background of unitary operators, and their properties relevant to quantum mechanics are first introduced. In particular, the fact that preservation of norm under the action of an operator implies unitarity, and that every unitary operator can be expressed as the exponential of i timesa Hermitian operator are introduced. Time evolution is then introduced in its integral form through the time evolution operator, and the Hamiltonian operator is introduced in this context. This approach, however, necessitates the restriction to conservative systems. Next, the differential form of the law of time evolution, i.e., Schrodinger equation, is derived from the time evolution operator, and this is postulated to be the general law of time evolution. We then demonstrate how, for conservative systems, the solution of the Schrodinger equation essentially reduces to solving the eigenvalue problem of the Hamiltonian. Constants of motion and Heisenberg picture have been relegated to the problem section.

Chapman & Hall/CRC eBooks•Jun 18, 2021•0 citations

A Simple Survey on the Problems in Quantum Mechanics

Ghosh Ak

Schrodinger wave equation, Hilbert space formalism, born’s rule for probability and hermitian operator are mainly the core of quantum theory and quantum description is generally based on Hilbert space of states, observables are described by self adjoint operators on the space of states, physical symmetries are explained by unitary transformations, and time evolution is a one-parameter group of unitary transformations on the Hilbert space of states. In this paper, I have discussed why a generalized philosophy is required before the development of quantum probability to fill up the gap.

Journal of Physics & Astronomy•Jan 1, 2018•0 citations

Quantum dynamics

Gennaro Auletta, Mauro Fortunato, Giorgio Parisi A

In the first two chapters we have examined the basic principles – superposition (p. 18), complementarity (p. 19), quantization (p. 44), statistical algorithm (p. 57), and correspondence (p. 72) (see also Subsec. 2.3.4) – and the basic entities, observables and states, of quantum mechanics, as well as the main differences with respect to classical mechanics. While what we have discussed so far is rather a static picture of observables and states, in this chapter we shall deal with quantum dynamics, i.e. with the time evolution of quantum-mechanical systems. Historically, after Bohr had provided a quantized description of the atom (see Subsec. 1.5.4), Einstein showed the quantized nature of photons (see Subsec. 1.2.1), and de Broglie hypothized the wave-like nature of matter (see Subsec. 1.5.5), the first building block of quantum mechanics was provided by the commutation relations, proposed by Heisenberg in 1925, whose consequence is represented by the uncertainty relation (see Subsec. 2.2.7 and Sec. 2.3). This was the subject of the previous chapters. The dynamical part of the theory was proposed by Schrödinger in 1926, and is known as the Schrödinger equation. It is also known as wave mechanics (see Subsec. 1.5.7). In this chapter we shall show that Heisenberg's and Schrödinger's formulations are only two different aspects of the same theory. We shall also come back to this point in Sec. 8.1.1. Here, first we shall derive the fundamental equation which rules quantum dynamics (Sec. 3.1), and, in Sec. 3.2, we shall summarize the main properties of the Schrödinger equation.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Apr 16, 2009•0 citations
The Unitary Dynamical Group in Schrödinger's Picture Up to now we have been concerned with the description of a physical system at a fixed instant of time. The time evolution of quantum systems constitutes a many-faced, wide issue which, however, is somewhat tangential to the main aim of this volume. We shall touch upon it only briefly, restricting ourselves to the more familiar aspects of the problem. We assume, to begin with, that the physical system has no superselection rules, so that states and physical quantities correspond one-to-one to density operators and self-adjoint operators, respectively, on the Hilbert space. To describe the dynamical evolution of the system one has to specify the way the representatives of states and physical quantities evolve in, which is fixed in time, since the physical system is supposed to preserve its identity. There is an old tenet according to which there are two kinds of time evolution: the discontinuous, nondeterministic evolution undergone by the quantum system when a measurement is made on it, and the continuous, deterministic evolution caused by the interaction with external forces or with other quantum systems. The first kind of evolution will be dealt with in Chapter 8, where we shall find it less alarming than is often claimed.
This chapter demonstrates how one can find the time evolution of the operators from the knowledge of the time evolution of the state vector, and vice versa. It introduces a unitary operator and discusses the concept of a unitary transformation to show how one could transfer the time dependence from the state vectors to the operators. The possibility that either the state vectors or the operators can depend explicitly on time will lead to introduce the Schrodinger, Heisenberg, and interaction pictures. The chapter discusses the fundamental differences between these pictures. It also discusses the Ehrenfest theorem, which shows under which conditions quantum mechanics predicts the same results for measured physical quantities as classical physics. It illustrates unitary transformations of an arbitrary operator Â(t) which can depend explicitly on time. Quantum mechanics produces the same result as classical mechanics for a system in which particles are represented by well-localized wave functions.
ABSTRACT: The main aim of this article is to present the time-evolution as the unitary and self-adjoint operators on Hilbert spaces and to describe its application in the development of quantum mechanics. The initial value problems associated with the quantum mechanical Schrodinger equation, ( ) = ( ) in the Hilbert space is solved by the use of timeevolution. The importance of time-evolution is also seen as the operation of turning machine in quantum mechanics, which is regarded as the time-evolution of the machine control state. Time-evolution of a quantum mechanical system is observed to be unitary and self-adjoint operators of Hilbert space, since it corresponds to an observable, specifically energy position and momentum. It was observed that time-evolution of a quantum mechanical system is generated by a self-adjoint operator, called Hamiltonian, V K H ˆ ˆ ˆ   , expressed by the Schrodinger equation, above.
The most general continuous time-dependent evolution of a physical system is represented by a continuous one-parameter semi-group of linear mappings of density operators to density operators. It is shown that if these dynamical mappings form a group they can be represented by a group of unitary operators on the Hilbert space of state vectors. This proof does not assume that the absolute values of inner products of state vectors or ``transition probabilities'' are preserved but deduces this fact from the requirement that density operators are mapped linearly to density operators. An example is given of a continuous one-parameter semi-group of dynamical mappings which is not a group.
In this chapter, we finally introduce time evolution. The development is carried out for finite, enumerable systems (i.e., systems whose states live in a finite dimensional, inner product space) which, of course, allows a straight forward extension to the continuum and infinite dimensional state spaces. The necessary mathematical background of unitary operators, and their properties relevant to quantum mechanics are first introduced. In particular, the fact that preservation of norm under the action of an operator implies unitarity, and that every unitary operator can be expressed as the exponential of i timesa Hermitian operator are introduced. Time evolution is then introduced in its integral form through the time evolution operator, and the Hamiltonian operator is introduced in this context. This approach, however, necessitates the restriction to conservative systems. Next, the differential form of the law of time evolution, i.e., Schrodinger equation, is derived from the time evolution operator, and this is postulated to be the general law of time evolution. We then demonstrate how, for conservative systems, the solution of the Schrodinger equation essentially reduces to solving the eigenvalue problem of the Hamiltonian. Constants of motion and Heisenberg picture have been relegated to the problem section.
Schrodinger wave equation, Hilbert space formalism, born’s rule for probability and hermitian operator are mainly the core of quantum theory and quantum description is generally based on Hilbert space of states, observables are described by self adjoint operators on the space of states, physical symmetries are explained by unitary transformations, and time evolution is a one-parameter group of unitary transformations on the Hilbert space of states. In this paper, I have discussed why a generalized philosophy is required before the development of quantum probability to fill up the gap.
In the first two chapters we have examined the basic principles – superposition (p. 18), complementarity (p. 19), quantization (p. 44), statistical algorithm (p. 57), and correspondence (p. 72) (see also Subsec. 2.3.4) – and the basic entities, observables and states, of quantum mechanics, as well as the main differences with respect to classical mechanics. While what we have discussed so far is rather a static picture of observables and states, in this chapter we shall deal with quantum dynamics, i.e. with the time evolution of quantum-mechanical systems. Historically, after Bohr had provided a quantized description of the atom (see Subsec. 1.5.4), Einstein showed the quantized nature of photons (see Subsec. 1.2.1), and de Broglie hypothized the wave-like nature of matter (see Subsec. 1.5.5), the first building block of quantum mechanics was provided by the commutation relations, proposed by Heisenberg in 1925, whose consequence is represented by the uncertainty relation (see Subsec. 2.2.7 and Sec. 2.3). This was the subject of the previous chapters. The dynamical part of the theory was proposed by Schrödinger in 1926, and is known as the Schrödinger equation. It is also known as wave mechanics (see Subsec. 1.5.7). In this chapter we shall show that Heisenberg's and Schrödinger's formulations are only two different aspects of the same theory. We shall also come back to this point in Sec. 8.1.1. Here, first we shall derive the fundamental equation which rules quantum dynamics (Sec. 3.1), and, in Sec. 3.2, we shall summarize the main properties of the Schrödinger equation.