Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Majorana particles with noise: problems with braiding anyons

David Peter Divincenzo

Published Jan 1, 2015• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

Topological Trouble: The problem with Braiding Majoranas

David Peter Divincenzo

I will begin with a general discussion of anyons, of which Majoranas are an example. I continue with a discussion of why particle statistics in 2D can be neither bosonic nor fermionic, nor even abelian, and what it means for the charge to be fractional. A simple model of Kitaev, of electrons hopping on a branched 1D lattice with strong spin-orbit coupling and superconducting pairing, is sufficient to describe Majoranas and the gates that can be done by moving them around each other (braiding). I discuss a model calculation of the decohence of these Majorana qubits during braiding in a trijunction, due to thermally generated quasiparticles (bosonic environment). The limitations to coherence are significant; topological protection doesn't really work in this scenario. (work with Dr. Fabio Pedrocchi)

•Jan 1, 2017•0 citations

Reading the quantum state change of Majorana braiding

Chun-Xiao Liu, Ching‐Kai Chiu

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 4, 2019•0 citations

Tensor Network Algorithms for Braiding Anyons

Babatunde M. Ayeni, Sukhwinder Singh, Robert N. C. Pfeifer +1 more

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 17, 2016•0 citations

Topological Qubits via Non-Abelian Anyons and Braid Groups — E8 Intelligence Research

Andrew Stewart Caldin

FINDING: Topological quantum computing leverages non-Abelian anyons (Majorana zero modes) and braid group representations to encode fault-tolerant qubits, with Microsoft's Majorana 1 chip claiming hardware realization. | MATH: Braid group \( B_n \) generators \( \sigma_i \) satisfy \( \sigma_i \sigma_{i+1} \sigma_i = \sigma_{i+1} \sigma_i \sigma_{i+1} \) and \( \sigma_i \sigma_j = \sigma_j \sigma_i \) for \( |i-j|>1 \). Anyonic exchange yields unitary matrices \( U(\sigma_i) \) with non-commuting phases \( e^{i\theta} \), where \( \theta \) depends on topological charge (e.g., Ising anyons: \( \theta = \pi/8 \) for \( \sigma \) particles). Fibonacci anyons: dimension \( d = \phi = (1+\sqrt{5})/2 \approx 1.618 \), with fusion rules \( \tau \times \tau = 1 + \tau \). Majorana zero modes: \( \gamma_i^\dagger = \gamma_i \), \( \{\gamma_i, \gamma_j\} = 2\delta_{ij} \), parity \( P = i^k \prod \gamma_i \). | CONNECTION: Fibonacci anyon dimension \( d = \phi = 1.618 \) — direct golden ratio e Author: Andrew Stewart Caldin, Independent Researcher, UK. Part of the E8 Intelligence Research series. Platform: e8intelligence.com

•Sep 8, 2026•0 citations

Majorana 1: Ising Anyons and the Unconfirmed Braid — E8 Intelligence Research

Andrew Stewart Caldin

FINDING: Microsoft's Majorana 1 chip claims topological qubit hardware based on Majorana zero modes, but the mathematical core is the non-Abelian braiding statistics of Ising anyons — not yet experimentally confirmed at scale. | MATH: Topological qubits encode information in the degenerate ground-state manifold of a 2D p-wave superconductor. The braid group \( B_n \) acts on this space via unitary representations. For Ising anyons, the fusion rule is \( \sigma \times \sigma = 1 + \psi \), with quantum dimension \( d_\sigma = \sqrt{2} \). The braid matrices are \( R \)-matrices satisfying the Yang–Baxter equation \( R_{12}R_{13}R_{23} = R_{23}R_{13}R_{12} \). The topological charge is \( e^{i\pi/8} \) for the \( \sigma \) particle. Key constant: the Fibonacci anyon (if used instead) has golden-ratio quantum dimension \( d_\tau = \phi = (1+\sqrt{5})/2 \approx 1.618 \). | CONNECTION: The Ising anyon's \( \sqrt{2} \) quantum dimension links to the square lattice and \( D_4 \) root system ( Author: Andrew Stewart Caldin, Independent Researcher, UK. Part of the E8 Intelligence Research series. Platform: e8intelligence.com

•Oct 13, 2026•0 citations

Braiding of majorana fermions and topological quantum computation

Louis Hirsch Kauffman

Journal of Material Science & Engineering•Nov 16, 2016•0 citations
I will begin with a general discussion of anyons, of which Majoranas are an example. I continue with a discussion of why particle statistics in 2D can be neither bosonic nor fermionic, nor even abelian, and what it means for the charge to be fractional. A simple model of Kitaev, of electrons hopping on a branched 1D lattice with strong spin-orbit coupling and superconducting pairing, is sufficient to describe Majoranas and the gates that can be done by moving them around each other (braiding). I discuss a model calculation of the decohence of these Majorana qubits during braiding in a trijunction, due to thermally generated quasiparticles (bosonic environment). The limitations to coherence are significant; topological protection doesn't really work in this scenario. (work with Dr. Fabio Pedrocchi)
FINDING: Topological quantum computing leverages non-Abelian anyons (Majorana zero modes) and braid group representations to encode fault-tolerant qubits, with Microsoft's Majorana 1 chip claiming hardware realization. | MATH: Braid group Bn B_n Bn​ generators σi \sigma_i σi​ satisfy σiσi+1σi=σi+1σiσi+1 \sigma_i \sigma_{i+1} \sigma_i = \sigma_{i+1} \sigma_i \sigma_{i+1} σi​σi+1​σi​=σi+1​σi​σi+1​ and σiσj=σjσi \sigma_i \sigma_j = \sigma_j \sigma_i σi​σj​=σj​σi​ for ∣i−j∣>1 |i-j|>1 ∣i−j∣>1. Anyonic exchange yields unitary matrices U(σi) U(\sigma_i) U(σi​) with non-commuting phases eiθ e^{i\theta} eiθ, where θ \theta θ depends on topological charge (e.g., Ising anyons: θ=π/8 \theta = \pi/8 θ=π/8 for σ \sigma σ particles). Fibonacci anyons: dimension d=ϕ=(1+5)/2≈1.618 d = \phi = (1+\sqrt{5})/2 \approx 1.618 d=ϕ=(1+5​)/2≈1.618, with fusion rules τ×τ=1+τ \tau \times \tau = 1 + \tau τ×τ=1+τ. Majorana zero modes: γi†=γi \gamma_i^\dagger = \gamma_i γi†​=γi​, {γi,γj}=2δij \{\gamma_i, \gamma_j\} = 2\delta_{ij} {γi​,γj​}=2δij​, parity P=ik∏γi P = i^k \prod \gamma_i P=ik∏γi​. | CONNECTION: Fibonacci anyon dimension d=ϕ=1.618 d = \phi = 1.618 d=ϕ=1.618 — direct golden ratio e Author: Andrew Stewart Caldin, Independent Researcher, UK. Part of the E8 Intelligence Research series. Platform: e8intelligence.com
FINDING: Microsoft's Majorana 1 chip claims topological qubit hardware based on Majorana zero modes, but the mathematical core is the non-Abelian braiding statistics of Ising anyons — not yet experimentally confirmed at scale. | MATH: Topological qubits encode information in the degenerate ground-state manifold of a 2D p-wave superconductor. The braid group Bn B_n Bn​ acts on this space via unitary representations. For Ising anyons, the fusion rule is σ×σ=1+ψ \sigma \times \sigma = 1 + \psi σ×σ=1+ψ, with quantum dimension dσ=2 d_\sigma = \sqrt{2} dσ​=2​. The braid matrices are R R R-matrices satisfying the Yang–Baxter equation R12R13R23=R23R13R12 R_{12}R_{13}R_{23} = R_{23}R_{13}R_{12} R12​R13​R23​=R23​R13​R12​. The topological charge is eiπ/8 e^{i\pi/8} eiπ/8 for the σ \sigma σ particle. Key constant: the Fibonacci anyon (if used instead) has golden-ratio quantum dimension dτ=ϕ=(1+5)/2≈1.618 d_\tau = \phi = (1+\sqrt{5})/2 \approx 1.618 dτ​=ϕ=(1+5​)/2≈1.618. | CONNECTION: The Ising anyon's 2 \sqrt{2} 2​ quantum dimension links to the square lattice and D4 D_4 D4​ root system ( Author: Andrew Stewart Caldin, Independent Researcher, UK. Part of the E8 Intelligence Research series. Platform: e8intelligence.com