Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Springer eBooks

Electron Decoherence at Zero Temperature

Pritiraj Mohanty

Published Jan 1, 2001• 1 citation
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-94-010-0427-5_11

Related papers

Zero temperature decoherence of interacting electrons: theend of the story?

Andrei D. Zaikin

•Jan 1, 2007•0 citations

Electron decoherence at low temperatures

Pritiraj Mohanty

APS•Mar 1, 2001•0 citations

Decoherence Assisted Single Electron Trapping at Room Temperature

Ahmed El-Halawany, Michael Leuenberger

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 1, 2012•0 citations

Decoherence control for non-zero temperature reservoirs

R. Rossi, A.R. Bosco de Magalhães, Maria Carolina Nemes

Physics Letters A•May 3, 2006•5 citations

Free electron motion in an electromagnetic field at zero temperature and the dependence on its rest mass

G. W. Ford, Robert F. O’Connell

Efforts to achieve quantum computation, teleportation, and communication depend on minimizing decoherence, which is the destruction of a quantum interference pattern. Here, we examine effects arising from the universal zero-point (temperature T = 0) oscillations of the electromagnetic field on a free electron in a Schrödinger cat superposition state. A unique conclusion is that the spreading of an electron wavepacket and the rate of decay of decoherence depend on the bare mass m of the electron. However, only for m = 0 does decoherence occur and the fact that it occurs almost instantly is ruled out by electron interference experiments. For m ≠ 0, the electron essentially behaves as a free particle.

Laser Physics•Apr 1, 2007•1 citation

Interaction-dependent instability of quantum-point contact detector for charge-qubit: exact theorem

Gleb A. Skorobagatko

The low-temperature limit of charge qubit decoherence due to its Coulomb interaction with electrons tunneling through Luttinger liquid quantum-point contact (QPC) is investigated. The study is focused on quantum detector properties of Luttinger liquid QPC. Efficiency of Luttinger liquid qurrent-carrying quantum point-contact (QPC) as quantum detector for the coupled charge qubit quantum state is characterized by the ratio of decoherence time and the acquisition of information time and how both depend on electron-electron interaction has remained an interesting open question. Here this question is answered in its most challenging zero- (and near zero-) temperature realization where the latter two characteristic time-scales, both tends to zero shadowing true picture of quantum detection in the zero-temperature limit. In order to resolve this difficulty two important mathematical statements (S-theorem and S-lemma) have been proven here for the first time. As the result, it was established here that low-temperature properties of QPC quantum detector with 1D electrodes are defined explicitly by the competition between two different time-scales those reflecting two different types of physical processes in the system. These processes are: i) the orthogonality catastrophe-type decoherence of charge-qubit, one is analogous to the decay of Kondo-resonance narrowed by QPC plasmons; ii) Kane-Fisher suppression of the electron tunneling through Luttinger liquid QPC resulting in the divergence of electron tunneling time. In particular, it has been found that at temperatures close to zero there exists a certain well-defined threshold value $ g=g_{cr} $ of Luttinger liquid correlation parameter which serves as a sharp boundary between region of good (or even perfect) quantum detection at $ g<g_{cr} $ and the region of quantum detector break down where $ g>g_{cr} $.

•Dec 27, 2017•0 citations
Efforts to achieve quantum computation, teleportation, and communication depend on minimizing decoherence, which is the destruction of a quantum interference pattern. Here, we examine effects arising from the universal zero-point (temperature T = 0) oscillations of the electromagnetic field on a free electron in a Schrödinger cat superposition state. A unique conclusion is that the spreading of an electron wavepacket and the rate of decay of decoherence depend on the bare mass m of the electron. However, only for m = 0 does decoherence occur and the fact that it occurs almost instantly is ruled out by electron interference experiments. For m ≠ 0, the electron essentially behaves as a free particle.
The low-temperature limit of charge qubit decoherence due to its Coulomb interaction with electrons tunneling through Luttinger liquid quantum-point contact (QPC) is investigated. The study is focused on quantum detector properties of Luttinger liquid QPC. Efficiency of Luttinger liquid qurrent-carrying quantum point-contact (QPC) as quantum detector for the coupled charge qubit quantum state is characterized by the ratio of decoherence time and the acquisition of information time and how both depend on electron-electron interaction has remained an interesting open question. Here this question is answered in its most challenging zero- (and near zero-) temperature realization where the latter two characteristic time-scales, both tends to zero shadowing true picture of quantum detection in the zero-temperature limit. In order to resolve this difficulty two important mathematical statements (S-theorem and S-lemma) have been proven here for the first time. As the result, it was established here that low-temperature properties of QPC quantum detector with 1D electrodes are defined explicitly by the competition between two different time-scales those reflecting two different types of physical processes in the system. These processes are: i) the orthogonality catastrophe-type decoherence of charge-qubit, one is analogous to the decay of Kondo-resonance narrowed by QPC plasmons; ii) Kane-Fisher suppression of the electron tunneling through Luttinger liquid QPC resulting in the divergence of electron tunneling time. In particular, it has been found that at temperatures close to zero there exists a certain well-defined threshold value $ g=g_{cr} $ of Luttinger liquid correlation parameter which serves as a sharp boundary between region of good (or even perfect) quantum detection at $ g<g_{cr} $ and the region of quantum detector break down where $ g>g_{cr} $.