Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Bulletin of the American Physical Society

Intermediate state: a new look at an old story

V. F. Kozhevnikov, Rinke J. Wijngaarden, Jesse de Wit, Chris Van Haesendonck

Published Mar 7, 2014• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

A new twist to an old story

G. R. Pickett

Nature•Mar 1, 2000•111 citations

A New Story of the Universe

George D. Catalano

Synthesis lectures on engineers, technology, and society•Jan 1, 2022•0 citations

The living state

Albert Szent‐Györgyi, Jane A. McLaughlin

International Journal of Quantum Chemistry•Jun 18, 2009•37 citations

Quantum technologies: an old new story

Iulia Georgescu, Franco Nori

Technologies based on the properties of quantum mechanics have been around for many years, but Iulia Georgescu and Franco Nori argue that we need a new definition for “quantum technologies”.

Physics World•May 1, 2012•38 citations

Altered states

Mark Haw

Nature•Jun 27, 2002•1 citation

To Be a Realist about Quantum Theory

Hans Halvorson

I look at the distinction between between realist and antirealist views of the quantum state. I argue that this binary classification should be reconceived as a continuum of different views about which properties of the quantum state are representationally significant. What's more, the extreme cases -- all or none --- are simply absurd, and should be rejected by all parties. In other words, no sane person should advocate extreme realism or antirealism about the quantum state. And if we focus on the reasonable views, it's no longer clear who counts as a realist, and who counts as an antirealist. Among those taking a more reasonable intermediate view, we find figures such as Bohr and Carnap -- in stark opposition to the stories we've been told.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Apr 11, 2019•9 citations
I look at the distinction between between realist and antirealist views of the quantum state. I argue that this binary classification should be reconceived as a continuum of different views about which properties of the quantum state are representationally significant. What's more, the extreme cases -- all or none --- are simply absurd, and should be rejected by all parties. In other words, no sane person should advocate extreme realism or antirealism about the quantum state. And if we focus on the reasonable views, it's no longer clear who counts as a realist, and who counts as an antirealist. Among those taking a more reasonable intermediate view, we find figures such as Bohr and Carnap -- in stark opposition to the stories we've been told.