The thread of this thesis is an attempt to clarify some assumptions that sound reasonable but whose correctness has never been proved or demonstrated formally. The first question I consider is: Do two quantum states near in the Hilbert space have the same, or almost the same, physical properties? First of all we have to clarify with which kind of measure we would like to measure the distance between two states. I do consider a measure, called Fidelity, that acts from the Hilbert space of a bipartite system to [0; 1]. Fidelity is null when the two states are orthogonal while if it is 1 the two states coincides. I show that high fidelities may be achieved by pairs of states with considerably different physical properties, including separable and entangled states or classical and nonclassical ones. Therefore, fidelity alone cannot be used to asses the very quantum properties of two states,but a tomographic reconstruction of the state is required. Secondly I question: Does a good quantum thermometer could be build with a system showing phase transition? I employ a critical magnetic system, known as Lipkin-Meshkov-Glick model, I study it in contact with a reservoir with it has thermalized but whose temperature is an unknown temperature to be estimated. I show that the best precision for temperature estimation it is not at critical point as someone could suspect but nevertheless criticality is an unmatchable resource even in the quantum realm. Last question is: when two different probes spatially separated interact with a common or a separate bath? It is quite a common opinion that systems, two objects located far away one from each others, feel the effect of different environments. Dissipation and decoherence are the two main processes which a quantum system undergo when it is not isolated, but when it interacts with another system much bigger. I explore how two different systems put in contact with a common bath show decoherence with typical quantum interference leading to a non obvious definition of separate environments.
The thread of this thesis is an attempt to clarify some assumptions that sound reasonable but whose correctness has never been proved or demonstrated formally. The first question I consider is: Do two quantum states near in the Hilbert space have the same, or almost the same, physical properties? First of all we have to clarify with which kind of measure we would like to measure the distance between two states. I do consider a measure, called Fidelity, that acts from the Hilbert space of a bipartite system to [0; 1]. Fidelity is null when the two states are orthogonal while if it is 1 the two states coincides. I show that high fidelities may be achieved by pairs of states with considerably different physical properties, including separable and entangled states or classical and nonclassical ones. Therefore, fidelity alone cannot be used to asses the very quantum properties of two states,but a tomographic reconstruction of the state is required. Secondly I question: Does a good quantum thermometer could be build with a system showing phase transition? I employ a critical magnetic system, known as Lipkin-Meshkov-Glick model, I study it in contact with a reservoir with it has thermalized but whose temperature is an unknown temperature to be estimated. I show that the best precision for temperature estimation it is not at critical point as someone could suspect but nevertheless criticality is an unmatchable resource even in the quantum realm. Last question is: when two different probes spatially separated interact with a common or a separate bath? It is quite a common opinion that systems, two objects located far away one from each others, feel the effect of different environments. Dissipation and decoherence are the two main processes which a quantum system undergo when it is not isolated, but when it interacts with another system much bigger. I explore how two different systems put in contact with a common bath show decoherence with typical quantum interference leading to a non obvious definition of separate environments.
In this thesis I study optimal strategies to estimate or characterize quantum states and processes (quantum channels). I consider the problem of estimating a phase encoded on a gaussian state. Phase estimation is at the heart of many quantum metrology applications, such as gravitational wave detectors or clock synchronization. I address the problem to the phase estimation fidelity for pure and mixed gaussian states and study how temperature affects the precision of estimation. Although the case of pure states has been studied before, very little is known about estimation in mixed states. The interest in mixed gaussian states relies on the fact that these are the states one has in real experiments with light due to the unavoidable presence of noise. Displaced and squeezed thermal states are studied. For the case of displaced states, I find that fidelity estimation gets worse when the temperature increases. On the contrary, for squeezed thermal states I find the surprising result that a larger temperature yields better estimation. This apparently paradoxical feature, also appears when I derive the estimation accuracy that can be obtained when an asymptotically large number of copies of the state is available. I also study quantum benchmarks that can be applied to a wide variety of protocols, such us quantum storage or quantum teleportation. A very important question in QIT is to know whether a particular quantum protocol can be realized by classical means with the same efficiency. After all, QIT lives from the promise of this quantum advantage. This question becomes specially relevant in experimental (real) implementations of quantum schemes. In real experiments there are always losses and the ideal quantum protocols become imperfect. It is then necessary to assess whether the same experimental result could be obtained by classical (less costly) means. So, for example, in a particular teleportation experiment -which involves generation of entanglement, complicated Bell measurements, fighting decoherence, etc.- one might ask whether one could achieve the same (i.e. mapping the state of a system to a second system located in a different place or time) by measuring the system, transmitting the collected information to the other location, and finally preparing the system accordingly. It is hence of paramount importance to give bounds on the efficiency of these measure and prepare (or entanglement breaking) channels. For this purpose we propose a threshold based on a phase-covariant family of states. Besides of being a family with a straightforward group-theoretical structure, which gives obvious computational advantages, this family is interesting because it can be tested experimentally also in a straightforward way. A crucial feature for the practical use of our benchmark is that it does not require pure (ideal) input states. I finally consider the problem of estimating the parameter of the amplification channel. The amplification channel is interesting by itself but also by the fact that the Hawking-Unruh effect can be formally modeled by it. The Unruh-Hawking effect is a relativistic effect and as such it is hard to measure and detect in current experiments. I investigate whether quantum strategies can provide an improvement over classical protocols in the estimation of the amplification parameter. If the field is inertially prepared in the vacuum one could measure its temperature as detected by a noninertial observer and extract information about the parameter. But I would like to know if the vacuum state is the optimal probe state in an inertial frame for such a task or a better sensitivity could be achieved if the field were in a state of nonzero energy (mean photon number) from an inertial perspective. The aim is to determine the optimal input states, so that, by optimally measuring the output, one can construct an estimator for amplification channel parameter which is unbiased and has the minimum possible variance.
Fidelity is a figure of merit widely employed in quantum technology in order to quantify similarity between quantum states and, in turn, to assess quantum resources or reconstruction techniques. Fidelities higher than, say, 0.9 or 0.99, are usually considered as a piece of evidence to say that two states are very close in the Hilbert space. On the other hand, on the basis of several examples for qubits and continuous variable systems, we show that such high fidelities may be achieved by pairs of states with considerably different physical properties, including separable and entangled states or classical and nonclassical ones. We conclude that fidelity as a tool to assess quantum resources should be employed with caution, possibly combined with additional constraints restricting the pool of achievable states, or only as a mere summary of a full tomographic reconstruction.
The title of the present dissertation Decoherence in Quantum Network sounds very general and all-inclusive. Indeed it embraces two topics (decoherence and quantum network) from the area of Quantum Mechanics each of which is described in all respects by a huge literature developed in the last three decades [...]. Quantum decoherence, as the name lets it mean, is the mechanism that makes a quantum system loose its coherence properties, and with them the capability of giving rise to interference phenomena or to other interesting quantum effects [...]. The key idea promoted by decoherence is the insight that realistic quantum systems are never isolated, but are immersed in the surrounding environment and interact continuously with it [...]. As an example one may consider a two-level quantum system (i.e. a quantum bit, usually shortened with a terminology from information science to \\qubit" ) in contact with a wide environment. Hence, quantum systems are open systems, and continuously interact or exchange information with an external environment whose degrees of freedom are too numerous to be monitored. The resulting correlation between the system and the environment spoils quantum coherence and brings about the transition from a pure quantum state to a mixture of quantum state resulting a classical state. To describe decoherence different kind of approaches can be used (for example Master equation, random matrix, etc). A quantum network typically consists of a number of quantum objects (e.g., atoms, ions, quantum dots, cavities, etc.), to be referred to hereafter as the sites or the nodes of the network. They can interact and the interactions (or their correlations) will be usually described by the edges of a graph. Quantum networks can address different information processing tasks. For instance a quantum state can be transferred from qubit to qubit down a chain solely due to the interactions, that is according to the laws of quantum physics [...]. Quantum networks offer us new opportunities and phenomena as compared to classical networks. An extension to large scale of the idea of a quantum network could lead to a futurible quantum internet [...]. The study of networks has traditionally been the territory of graph theory [...], also with the advent of their quantum versions. Within simple quantum network model information processing is usually described by assuming perfect control of the underlying graph. However, this is not much realistic since randomness is often present and it leads to decoherence effects [...]. In contrast, the conservation of coherence is essential for any quantum information process [...], hence there is a persistent interest in decoherence effects in quantum networks, which motivate us to study models for describing such noisy effects. We consider a simple model of quantum network, employing qubits (spin-1/2 particles) attached to the nodes of an underlying graph and we study the simplest task, namely information storage (on a single and two qubits), when the graph randomly changes in time. Actually we randomly add edges to an initially disconnected graph according to the Gilbert model characterized by a weighting parameter ex [...] and in an identically and independent way at each time step. We find that by increasing ex the dynamics of relevant quantities like fidelity, entropy or concurrence, gradually transforms from damped to damped oscillatory and finally to purely oscillatory. That leads to the paper [see, Information dissipation in random quantum networks, by U. Farooq and S. Mancini, OSID 21(3), 1450004, 2014]. We also study a system composed by pairs of qubits attached to each node of a linear chain, a model that stems from quantum dot arrays. Here we use the approach of evolution with a stochastic Hamiltonian to describe the noisy effects. We then evaluate the effect of two most common disorders, namely exchange coupling and hyperfine interaction fluctuations, in adiabatic preparation of ground state in such model. We show that the adiabatic ground state preparation is highly robust against these disorders making the chain a good analog simulator. Moreover, we also study the adiabatic information transfer, using singlet-triplet states, across the chain. In contrast to ground state preparation the transfer mechanism is highly affected by disorders. This suggested that for communication tasks across such chains adiabatic evolution is not as effective and quantum quenches would be preferable. That leads to the paper [see, Adiabatic many-body state preparation and information transfer in quantum dot arrays, by U. Farooq, A. Bayat, S. Mancini and S. Bose Phys. Rev. B 91, 134303, 2015]. The present work is organized as follows. In chapter 1, we shall give a survey of the various types of approach which can be employed to analyse the dynamics of open quantum systems that leads to decoherence effects. In chapter 2, we shall give a general description about quantum network and its possible applications. In chapter 3, we shall discuss the problem of quantum state transfer in qubit network and shall give a brief overview of some scheme that enable nearly prefect state transfer. In chapter 4, we shall discuss singlet-triplet networks, that is networks having on each site a pair of (generally entangled) qubit. Then within this framework we propose a model stemming from quantum dot array. There we shall address the problem of ground state preparation and state transfer. Finally we shall describe the inherent entanglement of the ground state of strongly correlated systems can be exploited for both classical and quantum communications. In chapter 5, we shall propose a decoherence model for qubit networks based on edges representing XY interactions randomly added to a disconnected graph accordingly to a suitable probability distribution. In this way we shall describe dissipation of information initially localize in single or two qubits all over the network. In chapter 6 we shall model the noisy effects in the quantum dot array introduced in chapter 4 and investigate their consequences on the preparation of ground state and quantum state transfer mechanism. Finally we shall draw conclusions.
Theory and experiment have not fully resolved the apparent dichotomy , which has agonized physics for the past eighty years: on the one hand, the description of microsystems by quantum mechanics and, on the other, the description of macrosystems by classical dynamics or statistical mechanics. Derivations of the time-irreversible Liouville equation for an open quantum system, based on projecting out its environment, have narrowed the gap between the quantum and classical descriptions. Yet our `classical' intuition continues to be confronted by quantum-mechanical results like the Einstein--Podolsky--Rosen paradox that challenges the classical notion of locality, or the quantum Zeno effect which suggests that the isolation of a system is not the only way to preserve its quantum state. There are two key concepts in any discussion of such issues. The first, which is responsible for the most salient nonclassical properties, is entanglement , that is partial or complete correlation or, more generally, inseparability of the elements comprising a quantum ensemble . Even after their interaction has ceased, this inseparability, originating from their past interaction, can affect the state of one element when another element is subject to a nonunitary action, such as its measurement, tracing- out, or thermalization. The second key concept is decoherence of open quantum systems, which is the consequence of their entanglement with their environment, a `meter' or a thermal `reservoir', followed by the tracing-out of the latter. Despite new insights into entanglement and decoherence, there are still no complete, unequivocal answers to the fundamental questions of the transition from quantal to classical behaviour: how do irreversibility and classicality emerge from unitarity as systems and their environments become increasingly complex ? At what stage does system--meter entanglement give rise to a classical readout of the meter? Is there an upper limit on the size or complexity of systems displaying entanglement? Major developments have opened new vistas into controlled entanglement , which is the resource of quantum information processing. However, these developments have mainly focused on ensembles of simple two- and three-level systems that are thoroughly isolated from their environments. Treatments of coherence in quantum computing have mostly assumed that only a single or a few the elements of the quantum ensemble may simultaneously undergo an uncontrolled intervention---a quantum error. Decoherence-control protocols for more general types of errors are still incomplete. In order to resolve the outstanding issues of the quantum--classical transition, and study the control of entanglement and decoherence without the foregoing restrictions, we must venture into the domain of Quantum Complex Systems (QUACS), either consisting of a large number of inseparable elements or having many coupled degrees of freedom. Our conviction is that fundamental understanding and manipulation of entanglement within QUACS or their entanglement with the environment or a meter, call for the creation of a new conceptual framework or paradigm, that would encompass phenomena common to cold atoms in laser fields, large molecules, Josephson junctions, quantum gases and solids, with the view of employing these systems for quantum information processing and computing. Progress within this paradigm should allow us to answer the questions: does entanglement play an essential role in the evolution of large collections of complex systems? What are the size and complexity limits of systems and ensembles still controllable by an external intervention? What are the most appropriate decoherence protection schemes and control algorithms? This special issue addresses the challenge of understanding in depth and manipulating the basic quantum properties of optical, atomic, molecular and condensed-matter QUACS, and large ensembles thereof. In view of the interdisciplinary character of this issue, we find it expedient to look at the presented articles not only according to the physical objects they describe, but also from a unifying standpoint. Several unifying themes may be discerned: memory effects in dephasing and relaxation; protection of quantum information by its distribution throughout the ensemble; control of decoherence and entanglement by time-dependent interventions or measurements; manifestations of entanglement in scattering off statistical ensembles; measurment-induced dynamics. The concerted discussion of the topics outlined above should help us advance the new paradigm that addresses our abilities to diagnose and manipulate the entangled states of complex quantum objects and their robustness against decoherence. These abilities are required for quantum information (QI) applications in matter--wave interferometry in molecular, semiconducting or superconducting systems. On the fundamental level, this book may help establish the notion of dynamical information exchange between quantum systems and chart in detail the route from unitarity to classicality. Further developments within the outlined paradigm should yield novel, advantageous QI processing schemes and high-sensitivity interferometers, owing to decoherence suppression and effective control of many degrees of freedom. In the long run, these strategies may prove to be the first step towards the (hitherto unattempted) use of entanglement in nanotechnology, metrology and chemistry, with potentially remarkable novel applications.