Comment on "Complementarity enforced by random classical phase kicks" Luis and Sanchez-Soto reply

Alfredo Luis Aina, Luis Lorenzo Sánchez-Soto

Published Feb 28, 2000• 0 citations

Related papers

Comment on “Complementarity Enforced by Random Classical Phase Kicks”

Berthold‐Georg Englert, Marlan O. Scully, HERBERT WALTHER

A Comment on the Letter by A. Luis and L. L. Sanchez-Soto, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 4031 (1998). The authors of the Letter offer a Reply.Received 12 July 1999DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.2040©2000 American Physical Society

Physical Review LettersFeb 28, 20003 citations

Comment on Experiments Related to the Aharonov–Bohm Phase Shift

Timothy H. Boyer

arXiv:0708.3194Foundations of PhysicsMar 13, 200826 citations

On mechanisms that enforce complementarity

Berthold‐Georg Englert, Marlan O. Scully, HERBERT WALTHER

In a recent publication Luis and Sánchez-Soto arrive at the conclusion that complementarity is universally enforced by random classical phase kicks. We disagree. One could just as well argue that quantum entanglement is the universal mechanism. Both claims of universality are unjustified, however.

arXiv:quant-ph/9910037Journal of Modern OpticsOct 1, 200016 citations

Comment on “Nonclassical depth of the phase state”

J. M. C. Malbouisson

Physics Letters AAug 1, 20014 citations

Beyond the Random Phase Approximation

J. D. Fan, Y. M. Malozovsky

Quantum MatterJul 2, 20151 citation

Luis and Sánchez-Soto Reply:

Alfredo Luis, Luis Lorenzo Sánchez-Soto

A Reply to the Comment by Englert, Scully, and Walther.

Physical Review LettersFeb 28, 20003 citations