Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

NATO ASI series. Series B : Physics

Few Remarks About Small Capacitance Josephson Junctions

A. Tagliacozzo, F. Ventriglia

Published Jan 1, 1991• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-1-4684-5961-6_22

Related papers

An ultra-small capacitance Josephson junction

Efrat Shimshoni, Yuval Gefen, Shimon Levit

•Jan 1, 1989•0 citations

Current dependence of the low bias resistance of small capacitance Josephson junctions

Venkat Chandrasekhar

arXiv:2404.05890•Physics Letters A•Apr 10, 2024•2 citations

The I-V Characteristic of a Resistively Shunted, Small Capacitance Josephson Junction

Vladimir Bubanja, Alec Maassen van den Brink, D. V. Averin +1 more

NATO ASI series. Series B : Physics•Jan 1, 1991•1 citation

Small-Capacitance Josephson Junctions: One-Dimensional Arrays and Single Junctions

道生 渡部, David B. Haviland

We review experiments on small-capacitance Josephson junctions. When the Josephson junction is fabricated in the configuration of dc superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID), the Josephson coupling can be tuned IN SITU with an external magnetic field. The electrical transport properties of one-dimensional arrays of small-capacitance dc SQUIDs have been investigated in order to study the superconductor-insulator transition. The arrays have also been used to bias a single Josephson junction, and a clear Coulomb blockade of Cooper-pair tunneling has been observed in the single junction.

arXiv:cond-mat/0301340•Jan 20, 2003•2 citations

Possible parametric capacitance in Josephson junctions

James Edward Zimmerman

Physics Letters A•Jan 1, 1973•9 citations

Phase diagram of Josephson junction arrays with capacitive disorder

Francesco Paolo Mancini, Pasquale Sodano, Andrea Trombettoni

We study the phase diagram at finite temperature of Josephson junction arrays with capacitive disorder (i.e., random offset charges and/or random charging energies): in the limit of large particle numbers per junction, this is a remarkable physical realization of the disordered boson Hubbard model. By using a mean-field approximation, we compute the average free energy and the equation for the phase boundary line between the insulating and superconducting phases. We find that the Mott-insulating lobe structure disappears for large variance $(\ensuremath{\sigma}\ensuremath{\gtrsim}e)$ of the offset charges probability distribution. Further, with nearest-neighbor interactions, the insulating lobe around $q=e$ is destroyed even for small values of $\ensuremath{\sigma}.$ In the case of random charging energies, until the variance of the distribution reaches some critical value the superconducting phase increases in comparison to the situation in which all self-capacitances are equal.

arXiv:cond-mat/0205568•Physical review. B, Condensed matter•Jan 21, 2003•11 citations
We review experiments on small-capacitance Josephson junctions. When the Josephson junction is fabricated in the configuration of dc superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID), the Josephson coupling can be tuned IN SITU with an external magnetic field. The electrical transport properties of one-dimensional arrays of small-capacitance dc SQUIDs have been investigated in order to study the superconductor-insulator transition. The arrays have also been used to bias a single Josephson junction, and a clear Coulomb blockade of Cooper-pair tunneling has been observed in the single junction.
We study the phase diagram at finite temperature of Josephson junction arrays with capacitive disorder (i.e., random offset charges and/or random charging energies): in the limit of large particle numbers per junction, this is a remarkable physical realization of the disordered boson Hubbard model. By using a mean-field approximation, we compute the average free energy and the equation for the phase boundary line between the insulating and superconducting phases. We find that the Mott-insulating lobe structure disappears for large variance $(\ensuremath{\sigma}\ensuremath{\gtrsim}e)$ of the offset charges probability distribution. Further, with nearest-neighbor interactions, the insulating lobe around q=eq=eq=e is destroyed even for small values of $\ensuremath{\sigma}.$ In the case of random charging energies, until the variance of the distribution reaches some critical value the superconducting phase increases in comparison to the situation in which all self-capacitances are equal.