Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Bulletin of the American Physical Society

Phase versus flux coupling between resonator and superconducting flux qubit

Jeffrey Birenbaum, Sean R. O’Kelley, S.M. Anton, Christopher Nugroho, Vladimir Orlyanchik, A.H. Dove, Zachary Yoscovits, Gustaf Olson, Dale J. Van Harlingen, J. N. Eckstein, Danielle Braje, R.C. Johnson, William D. Oliver, John L. Clarke

Published Mar 21, 2013• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

The temperature dependence of decoherence in superconducting flux qubits coupled to microwave resonators

Jean-Luc Orgiazzi, Chunqing Deng, Feiruo Shen +2 more

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 2, 2015•0 citations

Fluxon readout for superconducting flux qubits

Kirill G. Fedorov

This thesis presents experimental studies on developing of a novel fluxon readout for superconducting flux qubits. It is based on a scheme for detecting the microwave radiation of an oscillating fluxon in an annular Josephson junction (AJJ). The readout was implemented for a superconducting flux qubit coupled as a current dipole to the AJJ. An energy spectrum of the flux qubit was measured via detecting a frequency shift of the fluxon oscillations versus a flux bias through the qubit.

•Jan 1, 2013•0 citations

Coupling superconducting qubits and resonators

Joel Strand

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Feb 29, 2012•0 citations

Electromagnetic simulation of superconducting qubit–resonator coupling

Niko Savola

•Sep 10, 2020•0 citations

Circuit QED with superconducting flux qubits controlled by a bias current

Mun Dae Kim, Kyungsun Moon

We propose a scheme for a cavity quantum electrodynamics (QED) architecture for a current-biased superconducting flux qubit with three Josephson junctions. The qubit operation is performed by using a bias current coming from the current mode of the circuit resonator. If the phase differences of junctions are to be coupled with the bias current, the Josephson junctions should be arranged in an asymmetric way in the qubit loop. Our QED scheme provides a strong coupling between the flux qubit and the transmission line resonator of the circuit.

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 18, 2010•0 citations

Fast Quantum Gate with Superconducting Flux Qubits Coupled to a Cavity

Chun-Yao Yang

We present a way for fast implementation of a two-qubit controlled phase gate with superconducting flux qubits coupled to a cavity. A distinct feature of this proposal is that since only qubit-cavity resonant interaction and qubit-pulse resonant interaction are used, the gate can be performed much faster when compared with the previous proposals. This proposal does not require adjustment of the qubit level spacings during the gate operation. In addition, neither uniformity in the qubit parameters nor exact placement of qubits in the cavity is needed by this proposal.

arXiv:1207.7065•Progress of Theoretical Physics•Apr 1, 2012•0 citations
We propose a scheme for a cavity quantum electrodynamics (QED) architecture for a current-biased superconducting flux qubit with three Josephson junctions. The qubit operation is performed by using a bias current coming from the current mode of the circuit resonator. If the phase differences of junctions are to be coupled with the bias current, the Josephson junctions should be arranged in an asymmetric way in the qubit loop. Our QED scheme provides a strong coupling between the flux qubit and the transmission line resonator of the circuit.
We present a way for fast implementation of a two-qubit controlled phase gate with superconducting flux qubits coupled to a cavity. A distinct feature of this proposal is that since only qubit-cavity resonant interaction and qubit-pulse resonant interaction are used, the gate can be performed much faster when compared with the previous proposals. This proposal does not require adjustment of the qubit level spacings during the gate operation. In addition, neither uniformity in the qubit parameters nor exact placement of qubits in the cavity is needed by this proposal.