This chapter presents Feynman’s formulation of quantum mechanics, based on a path integral representation of the evolution operator. The chapter presents detailed examples which make it possible to understand clearly Feynman’s “sum over paths,” and it contains a complete discussion of how to calculate Gaussian path integrals. It also discusses the Euclidean version of the path integral, as well as Wick’s theorem and Feynman diagrams. Finally, it discusses instantons in quantum mechanics.This chapter presents Feynman’s formulation of quantum mechanics, based on a path integral representation of the evolution operator. The chapter presents detailed examples which make it possible to understand clearly Feynman’s “sum over paths,” and it contains a complete discussion of how to calculate Gaussian path integrals. It also discusses the Euclidean version of the path integral, as well as Wick’s theorem and Feynman diagrams. Finally, it discusses instantons in quantum mechanics.

Cambridge University Press eBooksDec 2, 20210 citations

Critical Review of Path Integral Formulation

Takehisa Fujita

The path integral formulation in quantum mechanics corresponds to the first quantization since it is just to rewrite the quantum mechanical amplitude into many dimensional integrations over discretized coordinates $x_n$ . However, the path integral expression cannot be connected to the dynamics of classical mechanics, even though, superficially, there is some similarity between them. Further, the field theory path integral in terms of many dimensional integrations over fields does not correspond to the field quantization. We clarify the essential difference between Feynman's original formulation of path integral in QED and the modern version of the path integral method prevailing in lattice field theory calculations, and show that the former can make a correct second quantization while the latter cannot quantize fields at all and its physical meaning is unknown.The path integral formulation in quantum mechanics corresponds to the first quantization since it is just to rewrite the quantum mechanical amplitude into many dimensional integrations over discretized coordinates $x_n$. However, the path integral expression cannot be connected to the dynamics of classical mechanics, even though, superficially, there is some similarity between them. Further, the field theory path integral in terms of many dimensional integrations over fields does not correspond to the field quantization. We clarify the essential difference between Feynman's original formulation of path integral in QED and the modern version of the path integral method prevailing in lattice field theory calculations, and show that the former can make a correct second quantization while the latter cannot quantize fields at all and its physical meaning is unknown.

arXiv:0801.1933Jan 13, 20081 citation

Quantum mechanics and path integrals

Efstratios Manousakis

Abstract This chapter discusses the Feymann path-integral approach to quantum mechanics. First, it derives a path integral expression for the evolution operator. Next, it shows that the classical equations of motion, that is, those obtained from the principle of least action, are obtained from this path integral formulation in the limit where the variation in the action of the problem at hand is small as compared to the Planck’s constant h. Last, it discusses how the WKB approximation is derived from the path integral formulation.Abstract This chapter discusses the Feymann path-integral approach to quantum mechanics. First, it derives a path integral expression for the evolution operator. Next, it shows that the classical equations of motion, that is, those obtained from the principle of least action, are obtained from this path integral formulation in the limit where the variation in the action of the problem at hand is small as compared to the Planck’s constant h. Last, it discusses how the WKB approximation is derived from the path integral formulation.

Nov 1, 2015221 citations

x_n

. However, the path integral expression cannot be connected to the dynamics of classical mechanics, even though, superficially, there is some similarity between them. Further, the field theory path integral in terms of many dimensional integrations over fields does not correspond to the field quantization. We clarify the essential difference between Feynman's original formulation of path integral in QED and the modern version of the path integral method prevailing in lattice field theory calculations, and show that the former can make a correct second quantization while the latter cannot quantize fields at all and its physical meaning is unknown.