Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Foundations of Physics

Toward a microrealistic version of quantum mechanics. Part II

Nicholas Maxwell

Published Dec 1, 1976• 6 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/bf00708945

Related papers

Toward a micro realistic version of quantum mechanics. Part I

Nicholas Maxwell

Foundations of Physics•Jun 1, 1976•25 citations

The General Principles of Quantum Mechanics. Part II

Edwin C. Kemble, Edward L. Hill

Reviews of Modern Physics•Jan 1, 1930•3 citations

Elements of nonlinear quantum mechanics (Part II): Triple bracket generalization of quantum mechanics

Marek Czachor

A new version of NLQM is formulated in terms of the generalized Nambu dynamics. The generalization is free from the difficulties of earlier approaches. The paper is a second part of "Elements of NLQM (I): NL Schrodinger equation and two-level atoms".

arXiv:hep-th/9406174•Jun 27, 1994•2 citations

A microrealistic explanation of fundamental quantum phenomena

C. W. Rietdijk

Foundations of Physics•Jun 1, 1980•12 citations

QUANTUM MECHANICS: THE REAL AND THE POSSIBLE

Giuseppe Boscarino

Conference on the Foundations of Quantum Mechanics: Historical Analysis and Open Questions•May 1, 2000•1 citation

On Non-Linear Quantum Mechanics and the Measurement Problem III. Poincare Probability and ... Chaos?

W. David Wick

Paper I of this series introduced a nonlinear version of quantum mechanics that blocks cats, and paper II postulated a random part of the wavefunction to explain outcomes in experiments such as Stern-Gerlach or EPRB. However, an ad hoc extra parameter was assumed for the randomness. Here I provide some analytic and simulation evidence that the nonlinear theory exhibits sensitive dependence on initial conditions in measurement scenarios, perhaps implying that the magnitude of randomness required is determined by structural features of the model, and does not require a free parameter.

arXiv:1803.11236•Mar 29, 2018•0 citations
Paper I of this series introduced a nonlinear version of quantum mechanics that blocks cats, and paper II postulated a random part of the wavefunction to explain outcomes in experiments such as Stern-Gerlach or EPRB. However, an ad hoc extra parameter was assumed for the randomness. Here I provide some analytic and simulation evidence that the nonlinear theory exhibits sensitive dependence on initial conditions in measurement scenarios, perhaps implying that the magnitude of randomness required is determined by structural features of the model, and does not require a free parameter.