Albert Einstein discovered that, two particles originated from the same source, when thestate of one changes, that ofthe other will change at the same time, no matter how far they are apart from each other. This phenomenon violates the special theory of relativity that was originated by himself. Later on he extended special relativity to general relativity, hoping to solve this problem, but with little success. In this paper, we are trying to elaborate more about our space central view of the phenomenon, wethen relate it tomore broad understanding of social and culture stories such as crimerate cycle, meditation power, super nature spiritual stories from ancient tombs around the world. We name it Super Natural Relativity.
Albert Einstein discovered that, two particles originated from the same source, when thestate of one changes, that ofthe other will change at the same time, no matter how far they are apart from each other. This phenomenon violates the special theory of relativity that was originated by himself. Later on he extended special relativity to general relativity, hoping to solve this problem, but with little success. In this paper, we are trying to elaborate more about our space central view of the phenomenon, wethen relate it tomore broad understanding of social and culture stories such as crimerate cycle, meditation power, super nature spiritual stories from ancient tombs around the world. We name it Super Natural Relativity.
Albert Einstein found that, for two particles coming from the same source, when the state of one changes, that of the other may change at the same time, no matter how far they are apart from each other.This superluminal phenomenon totally violates the special theory of relativity which says nothing's speed exceeds the limit of light speed, what's more, as of today, nobody has made a satisfying explanation of this strange phenomenon, not even Einstein's own general relativity.We bring forward our novel view of this long pending dilemma based on the observations of the latest physical lab reports and by summarizing various theories of information, computer science, communications, religion and physics itself.We call it Super General Relativity for now.
Quantum entanglement of pair of particles is now an established fact as described in [1]. But its theoretical explanation is yet to be found. So this letter attempts to propose one possible explanation, based on the previous works. In a paper titled: “Some conjectures on the nature of energy and matter ” [2], and its latest version titled: “ On the emergence of physical world from the ultimate reality ” [3] it was proposed that „space ‟ or „vacuum ‟ can be viewed as a „super flexible continuum (SFC), and „particles ‟ of „matter ‟ as „spherical standing wave patterns ‟ of fluctuations generated in SFC. Einstein tried to do-away with ether in his special theory of relativity, but when he had to assign curvature to space, he told: " Well, in that sense, there exists an ether " But majority of scientists still stick to emptiness of space, and are facing understanding observations like quantum entanglement and collapse of the quantum-mechanical wave-function. In this manuscript space is assumed to be a super-flexible-continuum, and you will find that it helps gaining an insight into the quantum entanglement and collapse of q-m wave-function. Since, in a continuum, when a labeled dot moves from point A to A‟, as shown in the figure1 here, the point B behind it has to move from B to B‟; and this chain of displacements has to complete a closed circular path, whose radius can be as small as a few nano-meters or as large as
Perhaps the deepest mystery in all of physics is quantum non-locality – the ability of two distant systems to instantaneously know about each other. Non-locality means that two particles in a quantum system can be "entangled" such that the state of one particle affects the state of the other, regardless of how far apart they are. As well as challenging our common sense, non-locality suggests that the ultimate speed limit – the speed of light – is violated. Einstein spent many years worrying about this problem because such "superluminal" interactions seem to be incompatible with special relativity.
Unlike special relativity, quantum mechanics was not the inspired product of one mind. It developed, in fits and starts, over a period of 25 years (1900–1925), and many cooks stirred the broth. Even now, a century later, quantum mechanics raises profound conceptual questions. Every competent physicist can “do” quantum mechanics, and the predictions it makes are in spectacularly good agreement with experimental results; there can be little doubt that quantum mechanics is “right.” On the other hand, as Richard Feynman once remarked, “nobody understands quantum mechanics.” I'll tell the story in two parts. First the history (how the essential pieces of the puzzle were assembled), and then the implications (what the finished picture has to say about our world). Photons Like relativity, quantum mechanics began with the study of light. In both cases, this historical association is misleading. Relativity, really, has nothing to do with light – to be sure, it involves that magic speed limit, c , and of course the most familiar thing that travels at speed c is light. So light is a convenient vehicle for introducing the subject. But it is perfectly possible to imagine a universe in which there is no such thing as light, and yet relativity might still be valid. Quantum mechanics, too, starts with light – in this case the “quantum” of light (the photon). But, as it turns out, this is just one rather specialized example of much more general principles – in fact, a rather bad example, because photons are by their nature relativistic (they travel at the speed of light), and it would be more natural to begin with the quantum mechanics of slow-moving objects, in analogy with Newtonian mechanics.
Since his famous discussions with Niels Bohr, Albert Einstein considered quantum entanglement (QE) as a spooky action at a distance, due to the violation of locality necessary so that two entangled particles can share this effect in an instantaneous way despite of being at a great distance from each other, i.e., not being local. In other words, a notification about the change of state in one of them could only cover the space that separates them at a speed superior to that of light, which we know is impossible according to the Theory of Relativity (TR). Besides, QE faces directly the two main pillars of Physics: TR and Quantum Theory (QT); becoming the bone of contention between both theories. Quite the contrary, in this work we will see that QE is the meeting point of both theories, so much so, that QE could be considered as the cornerstone of the Theory of Everything (TOE). Consistent with this, the entangled particles retain certain autonomy unknown to date, and in addition, they will have relativistically entangled alter-egos, which will hold the effect even when the original entangled particles are extremely separated from each other. These alter-egos can be considered as black holes (with their corresponding temperature and entropy) giving rise to a wormhole. This is possible since the locality dilates according to the Lorentz factor, which is accompanied by a contraction in the effective channel and in the temporal delay to cross that channel. All this takes place while space-time is curved (hyperspace) to generate the wormhole between both black holes. In other words, QE is a local effect of infinite range so it does not outpace the speed of light, and therefore QT is a complete theory that does not clash with TR. Finally, everything we have said has direct consequences on the link between entangled particles from the point of view of quantum communications in terms of the channel and its bandwidth, latency, capacity, robustness and security.
1124 NOTICES OF THE AMS VOLUME 45, NUMBER 9 I n the twentieth century, the quest for deeper understanding of the laws of nature has largely revolved around the development of two great theories: namely, general relativity and quantum mechanics. General relativity is, of course, Einstein’s theory according to which gravitation results from the curvature of space and time; the mathematical framework is that of Riemannian geometry. While previously spacetime was understood as a fixed arena, given ab initio, in which physics unfolds, in general relativity spacetime evolves dynamically, according to the Einstein equations. Part of the problem of physics, according to this theory, is to determine, given the initial conditions as input, how spacetime will develop in the future. The influence of general relativity in twentiethcentury mathematics has been clear enough. Learning that Riemannian geometry is so central in physics gave a big boost to its growth as a mathematical subject; it developed into one of the most fruitful branches of mathematics, with applications in many other areas. While in physics general relativity is used to understand the behavior of astronomical bodies and the universe as a whole, quantum mechanics is used primarily to understand atoms, molecules, and subatomic particles. Quantum theory has had a much more complex history than general relativity, and in some sense most of its influence on mathematics belongs to the twenty-first century. The quantum theory of particles—which is more commonly called nonrelativistic quantum mechanics—was put in its modern form by 1925 and has greatly influenced the development of functional analysis, and other areas. But the deeper part of quantum theory is the quantum theory of fields, which arises when one tries to combine quantum mechanics with special relativity (the precursor of general relativity, in which the speed of light is the same in every inertial frame but spacetime is still flat and given ab initio). This much more difficult theory, developed from the late 1920s to the present, encompasses most of what we know of the laws of physics, except gravity. In its seventy years there have been many milestones, ranging from the theory of “antimatter”, which emerged around 1930, to a more precise description of atoms, which quantum field theory provided by 1950, to the “standard model of particle physics” (governing the strong, weak, and electromagnetic interactions), which emerged by the early 1970s, to new predictions in our own time that one hopes to test in present and future accelerators. Quantum field theory is a very rich subject for mathematics as well as physics. But its development in the last seventy years has been mainly by physicists, and it is still largely out of reach as a rigorous mathematical theory despite important efforts in constructive field theory. So most of its impact on mathematics has not yet been felt. Yet in many active areas of mathematics, problems are Edward Witten is professor of physics at the Institute for Advanced Study. His e-mail address is witten@ias.edu.