Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Detecting and Reducing Gate Leakage in Superconducting Qubits

Benchmarking Z. Chen, J. Kelly, B. Campbell, Y. Chen, B. Chiaro, A. Dunsworth, C. Hoi, Evan R. Jeffrey, A. Megrant, J. Mutus, C. Neill, Chris Quintana, P. Roushan, D. Sank, A. Vainsencher, Jun Wen, T. White

Published Jan 1, 2014• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

Detecting and Reducing Gate Leakage in Superconducting Qubits using Randomized Benchmarking

Z. Chen, J. Kelly, R. Barends +20 more

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 3, 2015•0 citations

Suppressing Leakage in High Fidelity Single Qubit Gates for Superconducting Qubits

Z. Chen, J. Kelly, Chris Quintana +20 more

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 15, 2016•0 citations

Measuring and Suppressing Quantum State Leakage in a Superconducting Qubit

Zijun Chen, J. Kelly, Chris Quintana +20 more

Leakage errors occur when a quantum system leaves the two-level qubit subspace. Reducing these errors is critically important for quantum error correction to be viable. To quantify leakage errors, we use randomized benchmarking in conjunction with measurement of the leakage population. We characterize single qubit gates in a superconducting qubit, and by refining our use of derivative reduction by adiabatic gate pulse shaping along with detuning of the pulses, we obtain gate errors consistently below 10^{-3} and leakage rates at the 10^{-5} level. With the control optimized, we find that a significant portion of the remaining leakage is due to incoherent heating of the qubit.

arXiv:1509.05470•Physical Review Letters•Jan 13, 2016•264 citations

Analytic approach for suppressing leakage errors in superconducting qubits

Hugo Ribeiro, Alexandre Baksic, Aashish A. Clerk

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 15, 2017•0 citations

High-fidelity gates in a transmon using bath engineering for passive leakage reset

Ted Thorbeck, McDonald, Alexander, Olivia Lanes +6 more

Leakage, the occupation of any state not used in the computation, is one of the of the most devastating errors in quantum error correction. Transmons, the most common superconducting qubits, are weakly anharmonic multilevel systems, and are thus prone to this type of error. Here we demonstrate a device which reduces the lifetimes of the leakage states in the transmon by three orders of magnitude, while protecting the qubit lifetime and the single-qubit gate fidelties. To do this we attach a qubit through an on-chip seventh-order Chebyshev filter to a cold resistor. The filter is engineered such that the leakage transitions are in its passband, while the qubit transition is in its stopband. Dissipation through the filter reduces the lifetime of the transmon's $f$ state, the lowest energy leakage state, by three orders of magnitude to 33 ns, while simultaneously keeping the qubit lifetime to greater than 100 $μ$s. Even though the $f$ state is transiently populated during a single qubit gate, no negative effect of the filter is detected with errors per gate approaching 1e-4. Modelling the filter as coupled linear harmonic oscillators, our theoretical analysis of the device corroborate our experimental findings. This leakage reduction unit turns leakage errors into errors within the qubit subspace that are correctable with traditional quantum error correction. We demonstrate the operation of the filter as leakage reduction unit in a mock-up of a single-qubit quantum error correcting cycle, showing that the filter increases the seepage rate back to the qubit subspace.

arXiv:2411.04101•Nov 6, 2024•0 citations

Practical elimination of leakage in superconducting qubits by pulse shaping

Felix Motzoi, Jay Gambetta, Patrick Rebentrost +1 more

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 18, 2009•0 citations
Leakage errors occur when a quantum system leaves the two-level qubit subspace. Reducing these errors is critically important for quantum error correction to be viable. To quantify leakage errors, we use randomized benchmarking in conjunction with measurement of the leakage population. We characterize single qubit gates in a superconducting qubit, and by refining our use of derivative reduction by adiabatic gate pulse shaping along with detuning of the pulses, we obtain gate errors consistently below 10^{-3} and leakage rates at the 10^{-5} level. With the control optimized, we find that a significant portion of the remaining leakage is due to incoherent heating of the qubit.
Leakage, the occupation of any state not used in the computation, is one of the of the most devastating errors in quantum error correction. Transmons, the most common superconducting qubits, are weakly anharmonic multilevel systems, and are thus prone to this type of error. Here we demonstrate a device which reduces the lifetimes of the leakage states in the transmon by three orders of magnitude, while protecting the qubit lifetime and the single-qubit gate fidelties. To do this we attach a qubit through an on-chip seventh-order Chebyshev filter to a cold resistor. The filter is engineered such that the leakage transitions are in its passband, while the qubit transition is in its stopband. Dissipation through the filter reduces the lifetime of the transmon's fff state, the lowest energy leakage state, by three orders of magnitude to 33 ns, while simultaneously keeping the qubit lifetime to greater than 100 μμμs. Even though the fff state is transiently populated during a single qubit gate, no negative effect of the filter is detected with errors per gate approaching 1e-4. Modelling the filter as coupled linear harmonic oscillators, our theoretical analysis of the device corroborate our experimental findings. This leakage reduction unit turns leakage errors into errors within the qubit subspace that are correctable with traditional quantum error correction. We demonstrate the operation of the filter as leakage reduction unit in a mock-up of a single-qubit quantum error correcting cycle, showing that the filter increases the seepage rate back to the qubit subspace.