Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

European Journal of Science and Theology

God is Random: A Novel Argument for the Existence of God

Serkan Zorba

Published Jan 1, 2016• 1 citation
OpenAlex

Abstract

Applying the concepts of Kolmogorov-Chaitin complexity and Turing’s uncomputability from the computability and algorithmic information theories to the irreducible and incomputable randomness of quantum mechanics, a novel argument for the existence of God is presented. Concepts of ‘transintelligence’ and ‘transcausality’ are introduced, and from them, it is posited that our universe must be epistemologically and ontologically an open universe. The proposed idea also proffers a new perspective on the nonlocal nature and the infamous wave-function-collapse problem of quantum mechanics.

Related papers

A NOVEL ARGUMENT FOR THE EXISTENCE OF GOD

Serkan Zorba

Applying the concepts of Kolmogorov-Chaitin complexity and Turing‘s uncomputability from the computability and algorithmic information theories to the irreducible and incomputable randomness of Quantum mechanics, a novel argument for the existence of God is presented. Concepts of ‗transintelligence‘ and ‗transcausality‘ are introduced, and from them, it is posited that our Universe must be epistemologically and ontologically an open universe. The proposed idea also proffers a new perspective on the nonlocal nature and the infamous wavefunction collapse problem of Quantum mechanics.

•Jan 1, 2016•0 citations

Quantum Ontology and the Probabilistic God: A New Philosophical Framework for Understanding Existence

Yıldırım, Begüm

This paper introduces a new philosophical and scientific framework called Quantum Ontology, which integrates quantum mechanics and metaphysics to explore the possibility of a probabilistic God. Moving beyond deterministic paradigms, it investigates how quantum indeterminacy, probability amplitudes, and the collapse of wave functions challenge classical understandings of causality, order, and divine omniscience. The central thesis posits that if the foundation of physical reality is probabilistic, then any concept of divinity that aligns with it must also reflect this probabilistic nature. The work synthesizes insights from physics, philosophy, theology, and cosmology to construct an original view of a God who is not the controller of certainties but the ground of all lawful possibilities.The author acknowledges the use of OpenAI’s language model for assistance in drafting certain sections of this work.

•Jan 1, 2025•0 citations

Throwing Dice? Thoughts of God in a Quantum World

Shaun C. Henson

Abstract Quantum mechanics, like other enormously successful physical theories, accurately describes how the natural world behaves. Its explanatory powers regarding the indeterminate behavior of the smallest constituents of nature have proven to be both profound and practical. Many technological devices from lasers to computer chips are based on quantum mechanics. Not surprisingly, the universe filled with microscopic random events revealed by quantum mechanics has generated wonder and interpretive bewilderment. Reactions to the unsettling revelations of quantum unpredictability have included appeals to unknown variables to preserve classical physics, and even wholesale theoretical dismissals. Far from proof of mathematical trickery or theoretical incompletion however, the now well-established and irreducible quantum randomness suggests a physical universe that is open to a future not determined by the past, and perhaps to a God that really does play dice.

Oxford University Press eBooks•May 19, 2016•2 citations

Randomness in the Universe: An Incompressible Manifestation of Deep Deterministic Structures

Jincheng Zhang

This study investigates the fundamental nature of randomness in physics. Long dominated by the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics, the mainstream physical paradigm treats quantum randomness as an intrinsic and irreducible feature of nature. This paper proposes an alternative theoretical framework, arguing that observed cosmic randomness is not a foundational physical property, but rather an incompressible manifestation of deeper deterministic physical laws, hidden relational structures, and state evolutions in high-dimensional phase spaces. By integrating the concept of Kolmogorov complexity from algorithmic information theory with hidden relational topology models, we demonstrate that when a deterministic system's internal connectivity becomes too complex for algorithmic compression within low-dimensional observational constraints, its behavior becomes statistically indistinguishable from genuine stochasticity. This paper re-evaluates the interplay among quantum probability, information bounds, and deterministic dynamics, outlining a possible path toward unifying quantum mechanics and general relativity under a foundational deterministic architecture.

•Jul 24, 2026•0 citations

Randomness: Quantum Versus Classical

Recent tremendous development of quantum information theory led to a number of quantum technological projects, e.g., quantum random generators.This development stimulates a new wave of interest in quantum foundations.One of the most intriguing problems of quantum foundations is elaboration of a consistent and commonly accepted interpretation of quantum state.Closely related problem is clarification of the notion of quantum randomness and its interrelation with classical randomness.In this short review we shall discuss basics of classical theory of randomness (which by itself is very complex and characterized by diversity of approaches) and compare it with irreducible quantum randomness.The second part of this review is devoted to the information interpretation of quantum mechanics (QM) in the spirit of Zeilinger and Brukner (and QBism of Fuchs et al.) and physics in general (e.g., Wheeler's "it from bit") as well as digital philosophy of Chaitin (with historical coupling to ideas of Leibnitz).Finally, we continue discussion on interrelation of quantum and classical randomness and information interpretation of QM.

IMPERIAL COLLEGE PRESS eBooks•Feb 28, 2016•1 citation

The Logical Impossibility of the Christian God: A Quantum Information Theoretic Approach

Joon Hwang

Abstract This paper presents a formal proof for the logical impossibility of a deity possessing the traditional Christian attributes—omnipotence, omniscience, and intervention—within the framework of Quantum Information Theory. We define the universe as a quantum system and analyze the existence of God through two primary models: the universe as a closed system governed by unitary evolution, and as an open system described by CPTP (Completely Positive Trace-Preserving) maps. By applying the principles of Von Neumann entropy, Information Conservation, and the No-Hiding Theorem, we demonstrate that the intervention of an omnipotent agent inevitably leads to a contradiction with the fundamental laws of quantum mechanics. Specifically, we prove that an interactive God violates the linearity of quantum operators and the conservation of quantum information, while a non-interactive God fails to meet the definition of the Christian deity. Consequently, we derive a No-Go Theorem for the existence of the Christian God, concluding that such an entity is mathematically incompatible with the axioms of quantum physics. this paper use Chat GPT + Gemini for translation

•Dec 25, 2025•0 citations
Applying the concepts of Kolmogorov-Chaitin complexity and Turing’s uncomputability from the computability and algorithmic information theories to the irreducible and incomputable randomness of quantum mechanics, a novel argument for the existence of God is presented. Concepts of ‘transintelligence’ and ‘transcausality’ are introduced, and from them, it is posited that our universe must be epistemologically and ontologically an open universe. The proposed idea also proffers a new perspective on the nonlocal nature and the infamous wave-function-collapse problem of quantum mechanics.
Applying the concepts of Kolmogorov-Chaitin complexity and Turing‘s uncomputability from the computability and algorithmic information theories to the irreducible and incomputable randomness of Quantum mechanics, a novel argument for the existence of God is presented. Concepts of ‗transintelligence‘ and ‗transcausality‘ are introduced, and from them, it is posited that our Universe must be epistemologically and ontologically an open universe. The proposed idea also proffers a new perspective on the nonlocal nature and the infamous wavefunction collapse problem of Quantum mechanics.
This paper introduces a new philosophical and scientific framework called Quantum Ontology, which integrates quantum mechanics and metaphysics to explore the possibility of a probabilistic God. Moving beyond deterministic paradigms, it investigates how quantum indeterminacy, probability amplitudes, and the collapse of wave functions challenge classical understandings of causality, order, and divine omniscience. The central thesis posits that if the foundation of physical reality is probabilistic, then any concept of divinity that aligns with it must also reflect this probabilistic nature. The work synthesizes insights from physics, philosophy, theology, and cosmology to construct an original view of a God who is not the controller of certainties but the ground of all lawful possibilities.The author acknowledges the use of OpenAI’s language model for assistance in drafting certain sections of this work.
Abstract Quantum mechanics, like other enormously successful physical theories, accurately describes how the natural world behaves. Its explanatory powers regarding the indeterminate behavior of the smallest constituents of nature have proven to be both profound and practical. Many technological devices from lasers to computer chips are based on quantum mechanics. Not surprisingly, the universe filled with microscopic random events revealed by quantum mechanics has generated wonder and interpretive bewilderment. Reactions to the unsettling revelations of quantum unpredictability have included appeals to unknown variables to preserve classical physics, and even wholesale theoretical dismissals. Far from proof of mathematical trickery or theoretical incompletion however, the now well-established and irreducible quantum randomness suggests a physical universe that is open to a future not determined by the past, and perhaps to a God that really does play dice.
This study investigates the fundamental nature of randomness in physics. Long dominated by the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics, the mainstream physical paradigm treats quantum randomness as an intrinsic and irreducible feature of nature. This paper proposes an alternative theoretical framework, arguing that observed cosmic randomness is not a foundational physical property, but rather an incompressible manifestation of deeper deterministic physical laws, hidden relational structures, and state evolutions in high-dimensional phase spaces. By integrating the concept of Kolmogorov complexity from algorithmic information theory with hidden relational topology models, we demonstrate that when a deterministic system's internal connectivity becomes too complex for algorithmic compression within low-dimensional observational constraints, its behavior becomes statistically indistinguishable from genuine stochasticity. This paper re-evaluates the interplay among quantum probability, information bounds, and deterministic dynamics, outlining a possible path toward unifying quantum mechanics and general relativity under a foundational deterministic architecture.
Recent tremendous development of quantum information theory led to a number of quantum technological projects, e.g., quantum random generators.This development stimulates a new wave of interest in quantum foundations.One of the most intriguing problems of quantum foundations is elaboration of a consistent and commonly accepted interpretation of quantum state.Closely related problem is clarification of the notion of quantum randomness and its interrelation with classical randomness.In this short review we shall discuss basics of classical theory of randomness (which by itself is very complex and characterized by diversity of approaches) and compare it with irreducible quantum randomness.The second part of this review is devoted to the information interpretation of quantum mechanics (QM) in the spirit of Zeilinger and Brukner (and QBism of Fuchs et al.) and physics in general (e.g., Wheeler's "it from bit") as well as digital philosophy of Chaitin (with historical coupling to ideas of Leibnitz).Finally, we continue discussion on interrelation of quantum and classical randomness and information interpretation of QM.
Abstract This paper presents a formal proof for the logical impossibility of a deity possessing the traditional Christian attributes—omnipotence, omniscience, and intervention—within the framework of Quantum Information Theory. We define the universe as a quantum system and analyze the existence of God through two primary models: the universe as a closed system governed by unitary evolution, and as an open system described by CPTP (Completely Positive Trace-Preserving) maps. By applying the principles of Von Neumann entropy, Information Conservation, and the No-Hiding Theorem, we demonstrate that the intervention of an omnipotent agent inevitably leads to a contradiction with the fundamental laws of quantum mechanics. Specifically, we prove that an interactive God violates the linearity of quantum operators and the conservation of quantum information, while a non-interactive God fails to meet the definition of the Christian deity. Consequently, we derive a No-Go Theorem for the existence of the Christian God, concluding that such an entity is mathematically incompatible with the axioms of quantum physics. this paper use Chat GPT + Gemini for translation