Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Randomness in the Universe: An Incompressible Manifestation of Deep Deterministic Structures

Jincheng Zhang

Published Jul 24, 2026• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

This study investigates the fundamental nature of randomness in physics. Long dominated by the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics, the mainstream physical paradigm treats quantum randomness as an intrinsic and irreducible feature of nature. This paper proposes an alternative theoretical framework, arguing that observed cosmic randomness is not a foundational physical property, but rather an incompressible manifestation of deeper deterministic physical laws, hidden relational structures, and state evolutions in high-dimensional phase spaces. By integrating the concept of Kolmogorov complexity from algorithmic information theory with hidden relational topology models, we demonstrate that when a deterministic system's internal connectivity becomes too complex for algorithmic compression within low-dimensional observational constraints, its behavior becomes statistically indistinguishable from genuine stochasticity. This paper re-evaluates the interplay among quantum probability, information bounds, and deterministic dynamics, outlining a possible path toward unifying quantum mechanics and general relativity under a foundational deterministic architecture.

DOI
10.5281/zenodo.21532271

Related papers

Geometric Determinism: Reframing Quantum Noise as the Deterministic Baseline of Infinite Fractal Descent

Enkhamgalan Nasanjargal

A foundational tenet of standard quantum mechanics—a paradigm that has dominated theoretical physics since the early twentieth century—is the presumed existence of true, fundamental randomness at the smallest observable scales.1 Traditionally characterized by Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle and conceptually modeled as a chaotic "quantum foam," the universe at the Planck length is theorized to dissolve into an unpredictable, boiling void.1 Under the orthodox Copenhagen interpretation, as well as many subsequent derivative models, the universe at its deepest ontological level is fundamentally non-deterministic.1 Events at this scale are said to occur strictly in accordance with statistical likelihoods rather than rigid causality; physical properties are considered undefined prior to the act of measurement, and the collapse of the wave function is treated as an irreducible, inherently stochastic process.

•Apr 9, 2026•0 citations

A Reinterpretation of the Uncertainty Principle: The Residual $\Delta$ as Structural Necessity Rather Than Quantum Probability

Akihito Sugawara

This paper proposes a novel reinterpretation of the Heisenberg uncertainty principle in which the uncertainty term $\Delta$ is understood not as a manifestation of intrinsic quantum randomness, but as a necessary structural residue arising from incompatible descriptive constraints. Within the framework of a light-based cosmological model, quantum probability is treated as an emergent artifact of representation rather than a fundamental property of nature. This reinterpretation preserves the empirical validity of quantum mechanics while offering a deterministic conceptual foundation. The study further explores the implications of this perspective for paired universe formation, quantum measurement, and the relationship between observation and consciousness. By reframing uncertainty as inevitability rather than randomness, the work provides a unified conceptual bridge between quantum theory and cosmological structure without invoking stochastic assumptions.

•Jan 11, 2026•0 citations

From Protons to Planets: Deconstructing the Stochastic Illusion through Scalar Determinism

Shantanu S. Goel

The prevailing ontological framework of contemporary science posits "randomness" as a fundamental, irreducible property of the physical universe. This paper challenges that assumption, contending that randomness is an epistemic placeholder—a linguistic and mathematical heuristic for unresolved causal complexity. I introduce the Causal Vacuum Postulate, asserting that for an event to be truly stochastic (ontically random), it must occur in a state of absolute suspension from all universal fields—a state physically prohibited by the ubiquity of the Higgs, Gravitational, and Zero-Point fields. By synthesizing evidence from the Large Hadron Collider (LHC), Evolutionary Biology, and Algorithmic Information Theory, I argue for the Principle of Scalar Inheritance: the mechanism by which deterministic subatomic laws scale up to dictate macroscopic outcomes in complex systems. Finally, I argue that ontological randomness raises conceptual difficulties when examined under causal closure—a state that is unavoidable within the manifest universe. Furthermore, I apply this framework to the epistemology of artificial intelligence and macroeconomic market dynamics, illustrating how probabilistic smoothing destroys causal data. Finally, I address the biological paradox of measurement independence, arguing that human cognition itself is deterministically channelled by evolutionary constraints.

•Feb 2, 2026•0 citations

On the Admissible Geometry of Physical Motion: Courant-Fischer Spectral Reduction, Self-Adjoint Transport, and the Reinterpretation of Randomness, Probability, and Superposition

Jennifer Bulyaki, Andrew Elliott

On the Admissible Geometry of Physical Motion: Courant–Fischer Spectral Reduction, Self-Adjoint Transport, and the Reinterpretation of Randomness, Probability, and Superposition In this 90-page paper, we present a unified operator-theoretic framework for understanding physical motion across transport, stability, and quantum systems. Drawing from the mathematical lineage of Newton, Euler, Lagrange, Sturm–Liouville, Rayleigh–Ritz, Courant–Fischer, Koiter, and Schrödinger operator theory, the work argues that physically realized motion does not occupy the full formally accessible configuration space, but instead evolves only within admissible spectral manifolds selected by variational and self-adjoint operator geometry. We also develop a rigorous variational formulation in which entropy geometry, denoted by the field (S(x,t)), acts not as a classical measure of disorder, but as a geometric admissibility structure governing spectral realization. Within this framework, probability and superposition are not removed from physics, but are reinterpreted as residual structures supported on reduced admissible manifolds. The resulting operator law demonstrates that realized transport fields may be represented by a dramatically smaller number of admissible eigenmodes than the full numerical or statistical state-space traditionally assumed in classical stochastic transport theory. Using NASA Curiosity Radiation Assessment Detector (RAD) datasets from the Mars Science Laboratory cruise phase, the paper demonstrates that high-dimensional radiation transport repeatedly collapses into low-dimensional coherent occupancy structures. Spectral occupancy analysis reveals that realized transport concentrates into a small number of dominant admissible modes, implying that radiative motion is geometrically confined rather than broadly distributed across accessible LET space. These findings are interpreted through the mathematical structures of Sturm–Liouville spectral theory, Courant–Fischer minimax admissibility, Rayleigh–Ritz variational reduction, and Schrödinger localization theory. The manuscript further integrates nonlinear stability theory through the work of W. T. Koiter, demonstrating that admissibility restriction is already deeply embedded throughout classical continuum mechanics. By analyzing positive-definite energy functionals, second-variation structures, and admissible deformation manifolds, the paper shows that physical systems naturally restrict realizable motion through energetic geometry before probabilistic interpretation ever arises. This establishes a direct mathematical bridge between variational stability theory, operator localization, and constrained transport evolution. One of the central contributions of the work is the reinterpretation of randomness itself. Rather than treating randomness as a primitive ontological feature of nature, the paper proposes that randomness corresponds to unresolved or non-admissible geometric structure within the governing operator manifold. Under this interpretation, probability measures are supported only on admissible spectral sectors selected by self-adjoint variational evolution. The framework therefore unifies deterministic motion and residual probabilistic structure within a single operator-theoretic formulation. The work also consolidates and mathematically contextualizes a broader body of empirical investigations previously conducted by the authors across industrial CFD transport systems, structured heat transport, Navier–Stokes regularity, and quantum measurement theory. Across these independent physical domains, the same geometric phenomenon repeatedly emerged: the effective dimensionality of realized motion was dramatically smaller than the formally accessible state-space. The present paper provides the variational and spectral-theoretic explanation for this recurring empirical confinement structure. More broadly, the paper proposes that the history of mathematical physics has always implicitly pointed toward admissibility-constrained motion. From Newtonian mechanics and Hamiltonian conservation laws to Sturm–Liouville spectral realization, Rayleigh–Ritz minimization, Koiter stability theory, and Schrödinger operator localization, physical systems repeatedly evolve through constrained operator geometries rather than unconstrained stochastic occupation of all accessible states. The present work synthesizes these mathematical traditions into a unified framework suggesting that the reduction of probability space through admissible spectral geometry may constitute one of the foundational organizing principles underlying physical reality itself. At its deepest level, the paper argues that admissibility has always been the hidden organizing principle connecting the evolution of physical motion across seemingly disconnected domains of science. Newtonian trajectories are admissible paths determined by force geometry. Hamiltonian evolution confines motion to conserved energetic manifolds. Sturm–Liouville systems admit only boundary-compatible eigenfunctions. Rayleigh–Ritz and Galerkin theory restrict realizable solutions to admissible variational subspaces. Koiter stability theory permits only energetically realizable deformation fields. Schrödinger evolution itself unfolds within self-adjoint spectral sectors. The present framework identifies these not as isolated mathematical techniques, but as manifestations of a single underlying principle governing realized physical motion. Within this interpretation, the distinction traditionally drawn between classical determinism and quantum probability becomes substantially reduced. Classical mechanics, transport theory, elasticity, turbulence, and quantum evolution all emerge as different realizations of admissible operator evolution constrained by geometry, stability, and spectral realization. Probability therefore does not fundamentally replace determinism at microscopic scales; rather, residual probability appears precisely where admissibility geometry becomes unresolved, incomplete, or only partially observable within the governing operator manifold. The framework consequently proposes that deterministic evolution and probabilistic realization are not contradictory descriptions of nature, but different manifestations of the same underlying admissibility structure. The larger implication is the possibility of a unified theory of motion grounded not in unconstrained state enumeration, but in admissible spectral geometry itself. Across radiation transport, fluid mechanics, stability theory, quantum localization, thermodynamic transport, and variational mechanics, the same recurring mathematical structure appears: realized motion occupies only a reduced admissible manifold selected through self-adjoint variational evolution. The paper therefore suggests that the long-standing separation between classical and quantum descriptions of motion may ultimately be resolved through a unified operator-theoretic framework in which admissibility, rather than stochastic occupation, governs the evolution of physical systems across all scales of reality.

•May 16, 2026•0 citations

A Layered and Probabilistic Framework of the Cosmos: From Observable Reality to Quantum Foundations

azy tah

This article presents a conceptual and mathematical framework for understanding the universe as a layered system, where classical determinism and quantum probability are not opposing ideas but complementary aspects of reality.By introducing a foundational substrate beneath all physical layers, the paper explains how observable spacetime, quantum behavior, and probabilistic laws emerge naturally from deeper structures.The work combines intuitive explanations with mathematical formulations, aiming to bridge physics, cosmology, and foundational theory in a unified and accessible way.

•Jan 1, 2026•0 citations

Randomness: Quantum versus classical

Andrei Yu. Khrennikov

Recent tremendous development of quantum information theory has led to a number of quantum technological projects, e.g. quantum random generators. This development had stimulated a new wave of interest in quantum foundations. One of the most intriguing problems of quantum foundations is the elaboration of a consistent and commonly accepted interpretation of a quantum state. Closely related problem is the clarification of the notion of quantum randomness and its interrelation with classical randomness. In this short review, we shall discuss basics of classical theory of randomness (which by itself is very complex and characterized by diversity of approaches) and compare it with irreducible quantum randomness. We also discuss briefly “digital philosophy”, its role in physics (classical and quantum) and its coupling to the information interpretation of quantum mechanics (QM).

arXiv:1512.08852•International Journal of Quantum Information•May 27, 2016•27 citations
This study investigates the fundamental nature of randomness in physics. Long dominated by the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics, the mainstream physical paradigm treats quantum randomness as an intrinsic and irreducible feature of nature. This paper proposes an alternative theoretical framework, arguing that observed cosmic randomness is not a foundational physical property, but rather an incompressible manifestation of deeper deterministic physical laws, hidden relational structures, and state evolutions in high-dimensional phase spaces. By integrating the concept of Kolmogorov complexity from algorithmic information theory with hidden relational topology models, we demonstrate that when a deterministic system's internal connectivity becomes too complex for algorithmic compression within low-dimensional observational constraints, its behavior becomes statistically indistinguishable from genuine stochasticity. This paper re-evaluates the interplay among quantum probability, information bounds, and deterministic dynamics, outlining a possible path toward unifying quantum mechanics and general relativity under a foundational deterministic architecture.
A foundational tenet of standard quantum mechanics—a paradigm that has dominated theoretical physics since the early twentieth century—is the presumed existence of true, fundamental randomness at the smallest observable scales.1 Traditionally characterized by Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle and conceptually modeled as a chaotic "quantum foam," the universe at the Planck length is theorized to dissolve into an unpredictable, boiling void.1 Under the orthodox Copenhagen interpretation, as well as many subsequent derivative models, the universe at its deepest ontological level is fundamentally non-deterministic.1 Events at this scale are said to occur strictly in accordance with statistical likelihoods rather than rigid causality; physical properties are considered undefined prior to the act of measurement, and the collapse of the wave function is treated as an irreducible, inherently stochastic process.
A Reinterpretation of the Uncertainty Principle: The Residual Δ\DeltaΔ as Structural Necessity Rather Than Quantum Probability
This paper proposes a novel reinterpretation of the Heisenberg uncertainty principle in which the uncertainty term Δ\DeltaΔ is understood not as a manifestation of intrinsic quantum randomness, but as a necessary structural residue arising from incompatible descriptive constraints. Within the framework of a light-based cosmological model, quantum probability is treated as an emergent artifact of representation rather than a fundamental property of nature. This reinterpretation preserves the empirical validity of quantum mechanics while offering a deterministic conceptual foundation. The study further explores the implications of this perspective for paired universe formation, quantum measurement, and the relationship between observation and consciousness. By reframing uncertainty as inevitability rather than randomness, the work provides a unified conceptual bridge between quantum theory and cosmological structure without invoking stochastic assumptions.
The prevailing ontological framework of contemporary science posits "randomness" as a fundamental, irreducible property of the physical universe. This paper challenges that assumption, contending that randomness is an epistemic placeholder—a linguistic and mathematical heuristic for unresolved causal complexity. I introduce the Causal Vacuum Postulate, asserting that for an event to be truly stochastic (ontically random), it must occur in a state of absolute suspension from all universal fields—a state physically prohibited by the ubiquity of the Higgs, Gravitational, and Zero-Point fields. By synthesizing evidence from the Large Hadron Collider (LHC), Evolutionary Biology, and Algorithmic Information Theory, I argue for the Principle of Scalar Inheritance: the mechanism by which deterministic subatomic laws scale up to dictate macroscopic outcomes in complex systems. Finally, I argue that ontological randomness raises conceptual difficulties when examined under causal closure—a state that is unavoidable within the manifest universe. Furthermore, I apply this framework to the epistemology of artificial intelligence and macroeconomic market dynamics, illustrating how probabilistic smoothing destroys causal data. Finally, I address the biological paradox of measurement independence, arguing that human cognition itself is deterministically channelled by evolutionary constraints.
On the Admissible Geometry of Physical Motion: Courant–Fischer Spectral Reduction, Self-Adjoint Transport, and the Reinterpretation of Randomness, Probability, and Superposition In this 90-page paper, we present a unified operator-theoretic framework for understanding physical motion across transport, stability, and quantum systems. Drawing from the mathematical lineage of Newton, Euler, Lagrange, Sturm–Liouville, Rayleigh–Ritz, Courant–Fischer, Koiter, and Schrödinger operator theory, the work argues that physically realized motion does not occupy the full formally accessible configuration space, but instead evolves only within admissible spectral manifolds selected by variational and self-adjoint operator geometry. We also develop a rigorous variational formulation in which entropy geometry, denoted by the field (S(x,t)), acts not as a classical measure of disorder, but as a geometric admissibility structure governing spectral realization. Within this framework, probability and superposition are not removed from physics, but are reinterpreted as residual structures supported on reduced admissible manifolds. The resulting operator law demonstrates that realized transport fields may be represented by a dramatically smaller number of admissible eigenmodes than the full numerical or statistical state-space traditionally assumed in classical stochastic transport theory. Using NASA Curiosity Radiation Assessment Detector (RAD) datasets from the Mars Science Laboratory cruise phase, the paper demonstrates that high-dimensional radiation transport repeatedly collapses into low-dimensional coherent occupancy structures. Spectral occupancy analysis reveals that realized transport concentrates into a small number of dominant admissible modes, implying that radiative motion is geometrically confined rather than broadly distributed across accessible LET space. These findings are interpreted through the mathematical structures of Sturm–Liouville spectral theory, Courant–Fischer minimax admissibility, Rayleigh–Ritz variational reduction, and Schrödinger localization theory. The manuscript further integrates nonlinear stability theory through the work of W. T. Koiter, demonstrating that admissibility restriction is already deeply embedded throughout classical continuum mechanics. By analyzing positive-definite energy functionals, second-variation structures, and admissible deformation manifolds, the paper shows that physical systems naturally restrict realizable motion through energetic geometry before probabilistic interpretation ever arises. This establishes a direct mathematical bridge between variational stability theory, operator localization, and constrained transport evolution. One of the central contributions of the work is the reinterpretation of randomness itself. Rather than treating randomness as a primitive ontological feature of nature, the paper proposes that randomness corresponds to unresolved or non-admissible geometric structure within the governing operator manifold. Under this interpretation, probability measures are supported only on admissible spectral sectors selected by self-adjoint variational evolution. The framework therefore unifies deterministic motion and residual probabilistic structure within a single operator-theoretic formulation. The work also consolidates and mathematically contextualizes a broader body of empirical investigations previously conducted by the authors across industrial CFD transport systems, structured heat transport, Navier–Stokes regularity, and quantum measurement theory. Across these independent physical domains, the same geometric phenomenon repeatedly emerged: the effective dimensionality of realized motion was dramatically smaller than the formally accessible state-space. The present paper provides the variational and spectral-theoretic explanation for this recurring empirical confinement structure. More broadly, the paper proposes that the history of mathematical physics has always implicitly pointed toward admissibility-constrained motion. From Newtonian mechanics and Hamiltonian conservation laws to Sturm–Liouville spectral realization, Rayleigh–Ritz minimization, Koiter stability theory, and Schrödinger operator localization, physical systems repeatedly evolve through constrained operator geometries rather than unconstrained stochastic occupation of all accessible states. The present work synthesizes these mathematical traditions into a unified framework suggesting that the reduction of probability space through admissible spectral geometry may constitute one of the foundational organizing principles underlying physical reality itself. At its deepest level, the paper argues that admissibility has always been the hidden organizing principle connecting the evolution of physical motion across seemingly disconnected domains of science. Newtonian trajectories are admissible paths determined by force geometry. Hamiltonian evolution confines motion to conserved energetic manifolds. Sturm–Liouville systems admit only boundary-compatible eigenfunctions. Rayleigh–Ritz and Galerkin theory restrict realizable solutions to admissible variational subspaces. Koiter stability theory permits only energetically realizable deformation fields. Schrödinger evolution itself unfolds within self-adjoint spectral sectors. The present framework identifies these not as isolated mathematical techniques, but as manifestations of a single underlying principle governing realized physical motion. Within this interpretation, the distinction traditionally drawn between classical determinism and quantum probability becomes substantially reduced. Classical mechanics, transport theory, elasticity, turbulence, and quantum evolution all emerge as different realizations of admissible operator evolution constrained by geometry, stability, and spectral realization. Probability therefore does not fundamentally replace determinism at microscopic scales; rather, residual probability appears precisely where admissibility geometry becomes unresolved, incomplete, or only partially observable within the governing operator manifold. The framework consequently proposes that deterministic evolution and probabilistic realization are not contradictory descriptions of nature, but different manifestations of the same underlying admissibility structure. The larger implication is the possibility of a unified theory of motion grounded not in unconstrained state enumeration, but in admissible spectral geometry itself. Across radiation transport, fluid mechanics, stability theory, quantum localization, thermodynamic transport, and variational mechanics, the same recurring mathematical structure appears: realized motion occupies only a reduced admissible manifold selected through self-adjoint variational evolution. The paper therefore suggests that the long-standing separation between classical and quantum descriptions of motion may ultimately be resolved through a unified operator-theoretic framework in which admissibility, rather than stochastic occupation, governs the evolution of physical systems across all scales of reality.
This article presents a conceptual and mathematical framework for understanding the universe as a layered system, where classical determinism and quantum probability are not opposing ideas but complementary aspects of reality.By introducing a foundational substrate beneath all physical layers, the paper explains how observable spacetime, quantum behavior, and probabilistic laws emerge naturally from deeper structures.The work combines intuitive explanations with mathematical formulations, aiming to bridge physics, cosmology, and foundational theory in a unified and accessible way.
Recent tremendous development of quantum information theory has led to a number of quantum technological projects, e.g. quantum random generators. This development had stimulated a new wave of interest in quantum foundations. One of the most intriguing problems of quantum foundations is the elaboration of a consistent and commonly accepted interpretation of a quantum state. Closely related problem is the clarification of the notion of quantum randomness and its interrelation with classical randomness. In this short review, we shall discuss basics of classical theory of randomness (which by itself is very complex and characterized by diversity of approaches) and compare it with irreducible quantum randomness. We also discuss briefly “digital philosophy”, its role in physics (classical and quantum) and its coupling to the information interpretation of quantum mechanics (QM).