A charged elementary particle fluctuates from its mean position because of the presence of zero-point fields in vacuum. Considering the complex oscillations of the particle as two general types of rotations, an attempt has been made to explore the classical origin of spin angular momentum. The oscillations of the particle in zero-point field can be transformed as rotations on complex plane and the spin angular momentum is identified with imaginary part of rotations. The quantum value of spin angular momentum has been determined within the purview of stochastic electrodynamics. Keywords: Spin angular momentum, Zero-point energy, Stochastic Electrodynamics. 1.
A charged elementary particle fluctuates from its mean position because of the presence of zero-point fields in vacuum. Considering the complex oscillations of the particle as two general types of rotations, an attempt has been made to explore the classical origin of spin angular momentum. The oscillations of the particle in zero-point field can be transformed as rotations on complex plane and the spin angular momentum is identified with imaginary part of rotations. The quantum value of spin angular momentum has been determined within the purview of stochastic electrodynamics. Keywords: Spin angular momentum, Zero-point energy, Stochastic Electrodynamics. 1.
A rigorous derivation of the Schrödinger theory from the Pauli (or Dirac) theory implies that the Schrödinger equation describes an electron in an eigenstate of spin. Furthermore, the ground-state kinetic energy is completely determined by the electron spin density. This can be explained by interpreting the spin as an orbital angular momentum, which is necessarily accompanied by a kinetic energy. Thus, the spin is a zero-point angular momentum associated with the zero-point energy of the electron. Since the dispersion in electron momentum is determined by the zero-point energy, the Heisenberg uncertainty relations for an electron can be interpreted as a property of the electronspin motion. The kinetic interpretation of spin and the statistical interpretation of quantum mechanics can be jointly sustained by regarding the electron as a point particle. It follows that stationary electron states are sources of fluctuating electric fields. There is reason to believe that these fluctuating fields are responsible for the Van der Waals force and can be identified with electromagnetic vacuum field fluctuations. The kinetic interpretation of spin then implies that the Van der Waals forces are spin dependent. These ideas are not only consistent with the conventional mathematical formalism of quantum mechanics, they provide a more complete and coherent interpretation of many details in the formalism than does the alternative Copenhagen interpretation. They present some difficulties, however, which, if the kinetic interpretation of spin is correct, probably require some modification of quantum electrodynamics to be resolved.
Spin is an intrinsic form of angular momentum carried by elementary particles, composite particles, and atomic nuclei. It is wildly believed that spin is a purely quantum mechanical concept and has no classical analogue. In fact, elementary particles are conceived as point objects which have no axis to “spin” around. Therefore, there is no explaining how spin arises at the fundamental level, why particles have the values they do, and what underpins the Pauli Exclusion principle and Bose-Einstein behavior. However, spin is like a vector quantity; it has a definite magnitude, and it has a “direction”, in order to spin should be composite. In this paper we propose a physical explanation for spin of the electron at the sub-particle level, relying on the vortex model of the electron. The electron is described as a superfluid frictionless vortex which has a mass, angular momentum and spin to provide a complete explanation of all properties of the electron: it composite, spinning around its own axis, produces a tiny magnetic fields independent of those from its orbital motions. The classical hydrodynamic laws are used to describe the quantum properties of the electron, such as spin, angular momentum, magnetic momentum and a magnetic dipole. The circulation in the vortex is constant, and the angular momentum of the vortex is conserved and has the same value of Planck constant. The direction of the angular momentum of a spinning electron vortex is along the axis of rotation and determined by the direction of spin. The spin quantum number 1/2 has a fixed value which represents the gap between the circulation rate of the core of the vortex and the boundaries of the vortex. The changeable values +1/2 “spin-up” or -1/2 “spin-down” indicate the direction of the magnetic dipole of the vortex. The relation between spin and Planck constant is discussed and the origin h/4pi angular momentum units are revealed.
Most students of science and engineering know that every elementary particle, such as electrons, neutrons, photons, neutrinos, etc., has a quantum mechanical property called “spin” which can be measured (perhaps not easily, but at least in principle) and has a quantized value, including zero. The vast majority of these students mentally visualize spin as the angular momentum associated with the elementary particle spinning or rotating about its own axis (like a top or a planetary object). This mental picture, although convenient and comforting, is actually somewhat crude and certainly incomplete. Landau and Lifshitz, in their classic textbook on quantum mechanics [1], wrote “[the spin] property of elementary particles is peculiar to quantum theory. [It] has no classical interpretation... It would be wholly meaningless to imagine the ‘intrinsic’ angular momentum of an elementary particle as being the result of its rotation about its own axis.” The simplistic notion of self-rotation about an axis, shown in Fig. 1.1, can- not explain many features of spin, such as why its magnitude cannot assume continuous values and why it is quantized to certain specific values. It also causes serious problems if taken too literally. As we will see later (Problem 1.2), if we think of an electron as a solid sphere of radius equal to the Lorentz radius e2/(4πǫ0m0c 2) (where e is the electron’s charge, m0 is the mass, c is the speed of light in vacuum, and ǫ0 is the dielectric constant of vacuum), then the velocity on the surface of a rotating electron would have to be many times the velocity of light in vacuum if such a rotation were to generate an angular momentum equal to the electron’s spin. Obviously that would not be permitted by the theory of relativity. Indeed, a deep understanding of quantum mechanics is required to understand how the spin property comes about. Its origin is in relativistic quantum mechanics and really was first appreciated by Paul Andrew Maurice Dirac when he derived the Dirac equation which is the cornerstone of relativistic quantum mechanics. Richard Feynman, noted for his distaste for mysticism in physics, wrote about the notion of “spin”: “It appears to be one of the few places in physics where there is a rule which can be stated very simply, but for which no one has found a simple and easy explanation. The explanation is down deep in relativistic quantum mechanics.
Abstract Angular momentum in classical mechanics is given by a vector. The plane perpendicular to this vector, in accordance to central field theory, determines the space in which particle motion takes place. No such simple picture exists in quantum mechanics. The states of a particle in a central field are proportional to spherical harmonics which do not define any plane of motion. In the first part of this paper we discuss the angular distribution of particle position and compare it to the classical probabilistic approach. In the second part, the matter of addition of angular momenta is discussed. In classical mechanics this means addition of vectors, while in quantum mechanics Clebsch–Gordan coefficients have to be used. We have found classical approximations to quantum coefficients and the limit of their applicability. This analysis gives a basis for the so-called ‘vector addition model’ used in some elementary textbooks on atomic physics. It can help to better understand the addition of angular momenta in quantum mechanics.
Dirac combined special relativity and quantum mechanics, deriving the existence of spin—a kind of angular momentum. That angular momentum has been regarded as intrinsic, because Dirac's derivation did not try to identify whose rotation it is—let alone explain it. Following that tradition, concerning spin's physical nature, most textbooks simply declare that it is an intrinsic property, like electric charge. That declaration, while logical, is counter-intuitive, because unlike "electric charge", the term "angular momentum" already had a meaning—the momentum of rotation—long before the discovery of spin. Left unexplained, "intrinsic" is just a polite way to say "I don't know". Claiming that angular momentum is intrinsic, without saying what rotates, is equivalent to saying "that rotational property is not about rotation", which is an oxymoron. The paper is an attempt to find that physical referent.
Quantization of spin and orbital angular momenta in standard quantum mechanics is rooted in the fundamental rotational symmetry of space in conjunction with the results of experiments on atomic and subatomic particles conducted with the Stern-Gerlach apparatus. We explain some of the most important features of spin and orbital angular momenta as inescapable consequences of elementary Stern-Gerlach experiments viewed in light of the rotational symmetry of space. The rotation operator is first derived for spin-½ particles, then extended to spin-1 particles by treating the case of a hydrogen atom in its ground state, where the spin of the proton combines with that of the electron to create a spin-1 triplet state. Along the way, we examine the evolution of a particle’s spin state under an applied magnetic field, where the interaction energy arises from the existence of a magnetic dipole moment for each particle in proportion to its spin angular momentum. Whereas a constant magnetic field B0 causes the particle’s magnetic moment to gyrate around the direction of B0, it will be seen that the presence of a small oscillating magnetic field perpendicular to B0 brings about the so-called Rabi oscillations, which involve periodic flippings of the particle’s spin orientation. In the case of a hydrogen atom in its ground state, the interaction between the magnetic dipole moments of the proton and the electron splits the ground state between a lower energy singlet having a net angular momentum of zero (spin-0 state), and a higher energy triplet having a total angular momentum of ħ (spin-1 state). This hyperfine splitting is the source of the well-known 21-cm line observed in the spectrum of the hydrogen atom, which arises from transitions between the atom’s singlet and triplet states. In the final section, we put forward an argument (originally made by Richard Feynman) that ties the rotational symmetry of space to the conservation of angular momentum in quantum mechanics. The argument is, in fact, quite general, enabling one to deduce other conservation laws from various inherent symmetries of quantum mechanical systems.