Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Quantum State Reconstruction: A comparison of Maximum Likelihood

Hideo Mabuchi, J. K. Chin, Andrew C. Doherty, John K. Stockton, Tomographic Schemes, Daniel F. V. James, Paul G. Kwiat, Andrew G. White, Konrad Banaszek

Published Jan 1, 2001• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

Homodyne reconstruction of density matrix in Fock-state basis: deterministic versus maximum likelihood approach

Dmitri S. Mogilevtsev, Z. Hradil, Jan Peřina

Quantum state reconstruction, consisting of mixing an unknown signal with the sequence of probe fields on the beam-splitter and the subsequent counting of the statistics of the output state, is considered here. Besides the standard method based on deterministic inversion of counted data the maximum likelihood estimation is applied. The comparison demonstrates the possible failure of the standard reconstruction procedure in some cases.

Journal of Modern Optics•Nov 1, 1997•8 citations

Quantum State Reconstruction

Stefan Weigert

Compendium of Quantum Physics•Jan 1, 2009•1 citation

A scalable maximum likelihood method for quantum state tomography

T Baumgratz, A Nüßeler, M. Cramer +1 more

The principle of maximum likelihood reconstruction has proven to yield satisfactory results in the context of quantum state tomography for many-body systems of moderate system sizes. Until recently, however, quantum state tomography has been considered to be infeasible for systems consisting of a large number of subsystems due to the exponential growth of the Hilbert space dimension with the number of constituents. Several reconstruction schemes have been proposed since then to overcome the two main obstacles in quantum many-body tomography: experiment time and post-processing resources. Here we discuss one strategy to address these limitations for the maximum likelihood principle by adopting a particular state representation to merge a well established reconstruction algorithm maximizing the likelihood with techniques known from quantum many-body theory.

arXiv:1308.2395•New Journal of Physics•Dec 4, 2013•60 citations

Statistical tests for quantum state reconstruction I: Theory

Matthias Kleinmann, Otfried Gühne, Tobias Moroder +3 more

Verhandlungen der Deutschen Physikalischen Gesellschaft•Jan 1, 2012•0 citations

Quantum state reconstruction: a comparison of maximum likelihood and tomographic schemes

Daniel F. V. James, Paul G. Kwiat, Z. Hradil +2 more

Summary form only given. Experimental techniques for measurement of the quantum state of light have been the subject of intensive investigation for some time. Tomographic techniques have been applied to experiments such as the homodyne measurement of the Wigner function of a single mode of light and of the density matrix of the polarization degrees of freedom of a pair of entangled photons. In this technique, the density matrix (or Wigner function) which characterizes the quantum state of the system being measured is found from a linear transformation of experimental data. There are a number of drawbacks to the method, principally in that the recovered state might not, because of experimental noise, correspond to a physical state. For example, density matrices for any quantum state must be Hermitian, positive semi-definite matrices with unit trace. The tomographically measured matrices often fail to be positive semi-definite. To avoid this problem, the maximum likelihood approach to the estimation of quantum states has been developed. We evaluate two different approaches to the maximum likelihood technique, namely defining the likelihood function f as a weighted sum of squared variances from measured data, and defining it in terms of information content. These are compared with results of standard tomographical schemes.

Quantum Electronics and Laser Science Conference•Nov 13, 2002•2 citations

3 Maximum-Likelihood Methodsin Quantum Mechanics

Z. Hradil, Jaroslav Řeháček, Jaromı́r Fiurášek +1 more

Lecture notes in physics•Aug 18, 2004•98 citations
The principle of maximum likelihood reconstruction has proven to yield satisfactory results in the context of quantum state tomography for many-body systems of moderate system sizes. Until recently, however, quantum state tomography has been considered to be infeasible for systems consisting of a large number of subsystems due to the exponential growth of the Hilbert space dimension with the number of constituents. Several reconstruction schemes have been proposed since then to overcome the two main obstacles in quantum many-body tomography: experiment time and post-processing resources. Here we discuss one strategy to address these limitations for the maximum likelihood principle by adopting a particular state representation to merge a well established reconstruction algorithm maximizing the likelihood with techniques known from quantum many-body theory.
Summary form only given. Experimental techniques for measurement of the quantum state of light have been the subject of intensive investigation for some time. Tomographic techniques have been applied to experiments such as the homodyne measurement of the Wigner function of a single mode of light and of the density matrix of the polarization degrees of freedom of a pair of entangled photons. In this technique, the density matrix (or Wigner function) which characterizes the quantum state of the system being measured is found from a linear transformation of experimental data. There are a number of drawbacks to the method, principally in that the recovered state might not, because of experimental noise, correspond to a physical state. For example, density matrices for any quantum state must be Hermitian, positive semi-definite matrices with unit trace. The tomographically measured matrices often fail to be positive semi-definite. To avoid this problem, the maximum likelihood approach to the estimation of quantum states has been developed. We evaluate two different approaches to the maximum likelihood technique, namely defining the likelihood function f as a weighted sum of squared variances from measured data, and defining it in terms of information content. These are compared with results of standard tomographical schemes.