Tite grolllld statl' enerp;y, tlle pressure alld the sound velocity are ralculatpd frolll first-principles for a wide rauge of densities in fluid Spill-pola.riz{'d atolllic hydrog(,ll. We emplo)' Quantum ThermodyIlamir. Pertnrhtioll Theory (QTPT). wilcl'chy t1le intcrpartic1t' attractioll is the perturhittioll, with two pir-potclltials for the spin-polarizeu statc, the LC'IIIliinl.,Jones alld KolosWolniewicz forrns. EIlC'r,l!Scaiculations reported in thf' literature agrf'e with 0111'5in thc regime 01'ery low dellsity. and for Itiher densitie mil' caIc-ulatiolls are below tite ..•. ari. atiollal Ol1es, PACS: 67.65.+zj 67.40.Kh; 05.30 ..Jp 1. lntroduction During the past fiftccn years. the possihility of prodll('illg hulk eiectroll-spillpolarized atornic hydrogell at opt.illlum (oJlditions of dCllsily aud t.empcraturc in order to observe Bosf:'-EillstC'in (BE) C'OJldensatioll, has (aptllrl'd the interest of both tlwol'ists and experilflt'lltalists, who havl' t.ried to predict illld ()bSIrVe t.he propt'rties 01' this 1Il\VqualltullI systelIl. At very lo\' tt'lIlp{'rature, it has bt't'll possible lo produce and 'I'resent addrt'ss: Physics !)ept., ChlJlIg YU:Hl Christ ian Ullivo'rsity, Taiwan :5'20,Hepublic of Chilla Zcro-temperalllt'e. iJ1vpertics 01 a spin-polarizcd atornic hydrogcn fluid 295 HtH. ,, Hf-Hf' ,, , , , .' \5 ' lO '> 5
We report diffusion Monte Carlo (DMC) and path integral Monte Carlo (PIMC) calculations of the properties of a one-dimensional (1D) Bose quantum fluid. The equation of state, the superfluid fraction ${\ensuremath{\rho}}_{S}/{\ensuremath{\rho}}_{0}$, the one-body density matrix
n(x), the pair distribution function
g(x), and the static structure factor
S(q) are evaluated. The aim is to test Luttinger liquid (LL) predictions for 1D fluids over a wide range of fluid density and LL parameter
K. The 1D Bose fluid examined is a single chain of
4He atoms confined to a line in the center of a narrow nanopore. The atoms cannot exchange positions in the nanopore, the criterion for 1D. The fluid density is varied from the spinodal density where the 1D liquid is unstable to droplet formation to the density of bulk liquid
4He. In this range,
K varies from
K>2 at low density, where a robust superfluid is predicted, to
K<0.5, where fragile 1D superflow and solidlike peaks in
S(q) are predicted. For uniform pore walls, the ${\ensuremath{\rho}}_{S}/{\ensuremath{\rho}}_{0}$ scales as predicted by LL theory. The
n(x) and
g(x) show long range oscillations and decay with
x as predicted by LL theory. The amplitude of the oscillations is large at high density (small
K) and small at low density (large
K). The
K values obtained from different properties agree well verifying the internal structure of LL theory. In the presence of disorder, the ${\ensuremath{\rho}}_{S}/{\ensuremath{\rho}}_{0}$ does not scale as predicted by LL theory. A single
vJ parameter in the LL theory that recovers LL scaling was not found. The one body density matrix (OBDM) in disorder is well predicted by LL theory. The ``dynamical'' superfluid fraction, ${\ensuremath{\rho}}_{S}^{D}/{\ensuremath{\rho}}_{0}$, is determined. The physics of the deviation from LL theory in disorder and the ``dynamical'' ${\ensuremath{\rho}}_{S}^{D}/{\ensuremath{\rho}}_{0}$ are discussed.
Water flowing down a pipe experiences viscous drag that causes it to lose energy and slow down. A superfluid, such as liquid helium (3He and 4He) or electrons in a superconductor, can flow without friction when in contact with a wall. This fascinating phenomenon, or superfluidity, was discovered by Kapitza [1], Allen and Misener [2] in 1937. The formation of a superfluid is related to the formation of a Bose--Einstein condensate (BEC). 4He is a boson as its total spin is zero, an integer. Condensation in fermionic 3He liquid occurs through composite bosons of paired atoms in a process similar to electron pairing in a superconductor. To explain the peculiar properties of superfluid helium, Landau considered a superfluid to be comprised of two parts: a ‘pure’ superfluid component with zero entropy and viscosity, and a normal component that behaves like ordinary fluid. An interesting manifestation of this two-fluid model is the existence of two types of oscillations, the ‘first and second sounds’ as named by Landau. The ‘first sound’ is a wave that propagates at constant entropy per particle, just like sounds in ordinary fluids. It propagates with pressure and density oscillations. ‘Second sound’, unlike what its name suggests, is not audible as it propagates at nearly constant pressure (isobaric oscillation). Here, entropy density takes the role of pressure/density in normal sound waves. Historically, the observation of the second sound in superfluid helium, and the measurement of its speed, played a crucial role in understanding the nature of superfluid helium. The speed of the second sound can be used to determine the superfluid fraction, i.e. the ratio of the superfluid density to the total fluid density [3,4]. In the past decades, the field of ultracold atomic gases has developed into a fertile ground for studying superfluid physics, as the inter-particle interactions between two atoms can be tuned using the so-called Fano–Feshbach resonances. Systematic studies on Fermi gases can be preformed in the limit of strong interactions, whose properties are difficult to predict but important to the understanding of strongly correlated quantum systems of many particles, such as high-temperature superconductors, quark–gluon plasmas and neutron stars. Quantitative determination of the superfluid fraction in strongly interacting Fermi gases has been an elusive goal of scientists for many years, as the methods that allow the determination of the superfluid fraction in liquid helium cannot be directly applied to ultracold gases. For example, to excite the second sound in liquid helium, a local heat pulse can be created by passing a current through a heating wire submersed in the liquid. The heat pulse can then be detected at the other end of the liquid using a temperature sensitive sensor as illustrated in Fig. 1(a). Such methods cannot be implemented with ultracold atomic gas ensembles that typically contain only about hundreds of thousand atoms at μK (1 millionth of a kelvin) temperatures. Further adding to the difficulties, the propagation of the second sound in liquid helium usually involves no density variation/oscillation. This means that the second sound could not be detected easily with the absorption imaging technique typically used for probing cold atoms, assuming that the strongly interacting Fermi gases behave very much like strongly interacting bosonic liquid helium (4He). (a) Excitation and detection of the second sound in superfluid helium; (b) local heating through the power modulation of an excitation laser beam; (c) the detection of the second sound in a strongly interacting Fermi gas with direct absorption imaging. Recently, the group of Professor Rudolf Grimm from the University of Innsbruck (Austria), in collaboration with a theoretical team from the Trento University (Italy) led by Professors Sandro Stringari and Lev Pitaevskii, successfully measured the speed of second sound in a resonantly interacting Fermi gas using a simple and elegant method. Their results were published in [5]. To observe the second sound, the authors created a local heat pulse at the center of an elongated trapped gas by creating a short burst of modulation to the power of a light beam intercepting this gas (see Fig. 1b). They then measured the speed of the second sound by observing the movement of a thermal-induced density dip along the elongated gas (Fig. 1c). Taking advantage of the inhomogeneous density distributions of the superfluid atoms in the trap, they ingeniously determined the temperature dependence of the superfluid fraction without needing to vary the temperature of the samples. The observation of the second sound in the strongly interacting Fermi gases opens up a new horizon for studying the superfluid properties with tunable interactions. Knowing the speed of second sound can provide a lot of valuable information, allowing physicists working on many-body theories to falsify their models and theories. It demonstrates the importance of using experimentally measured quantities, such as the equation of state employed here, to calibrate and to supplement theoretical investigations. Significant new advances will follow in the understanding of superfluidity of many strongly interacting particles, where faithful theoretical modeling and calculations are impossible at the microscopic level.