Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics

The problem of ontology for spontaneous collapse theories

Bradley Monton

Published May 31, 2004• 46 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1016/j.shpsb.2004.03.001

Related papers

Paradoxes and Primitive Ontology in Collapse Theories of Quantum Mechanics

Shan Gao

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Apr 20, 2018•14 citations

Spontaneous Collapse Theories and Cosmology

Daniel Sudarsky

Fundamental theories of physics•Oct 2, 2020•7 citations

On the Status of Primitive Ontology

Shan Gao

Spontaneous collapse theories provide a promising solution to the measurement problem. But they also introduce a number of problems of their own concerning dimensionality, vagueness, and locality. In response to these problems, advocates of collapse theories have proposed various accounts of the primitive ontology of collapse theories—postulated underlying entities governed by the collapse theory and underwriting our observations. The most prominent of these are a mass density distribution over three-dimensional space, and a set of discrete “flash” events at space-time points. My argument here is that these primitive ontologies are redundant, in the sense that the structures exhibited by the primitive ontologies that allow them to solve the problems facing spontaneous collapse theories are also present in the wave function. But redundancy is not nonexistence; indeed, the fact that the relevant structures are already there in the wave function shows that the mass density ontology and the flash ontology exist whether they are explicitly postulated or not. By the same token, there is no need to decide between a wave function ontology, a mass density ontology and a flash ontology.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Apr 20, 2018•7 citations

Primitive Ontology, Fundamentality, and Scale

Emily Adlam

Abstract This chapter introduces the ‘primitive ontology’ approaches to the measurement problem, including spontaneous collapse models and the de Brolige-Bohm approach. I consider some possible epistemic problems that could arise in a primitive ontology approach, but ultimately conclude that primitive ontology approaches do appear to solve the epistemic version of the measurement problem. However, I note that there are good reasons to think the existing primitive ontology approaches cannot be extended to quantum field theory, thus motivating a search for alternatives beyond the primitive ontology paradigm. I also discuss the role of autonomy of scales in physics.

•Jun 12, 2025•0 citations

Revisiting the Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics: From FAPP Solutions to Contextual Ontologies

Philippe Grangier

This note presents a concise and non-polemical comparison of several major interpretations of quantum mechanics, with a particular emphasis on the distinction between FAPP-solutions ("For All Practical Purposes'') versus ontological solutions to the measurement problem. Building on this distinction, we argue that the Contexts-Systems-Modalities (CSM) framework, supplemented by the operator-algebraic description of macroscopic contexts, provides a conceptually complete, non-FAPP ontology that naturally incorporates irreversibility and the physical structure of measurement devices. This approach differs significantly from other ontological interpretations such as Bohmian mechanics, spontaneous collapse, or many-worlds, and highlights the major role of contextual quantization in shaping quantum theory.

quant-pharXiv:2601.20488•Jan 29, 2026•0 citations

Interpreting spontaneous collapse theories

Peter J. Lewis

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics•Nov 3, 2004•19 citations
Spontaneous collapse theories provide a promising solution to the measurement problem. But they also introduce a number of problems of their own concerning dimensionality, vagueness, and locality. In response to these problems, advocates of collapse theories have proposed various accounts of the primitive ontology of collapse theories—postulated underlying entities governed by the collapse theory and underwriting our observations. The most prominent of these are a mass density distribution over three-dimensional space, and a set of discrete “flash” events at space-time points. My argument here is that these primitive ontologies are redundant, in the sense that the structures exhibited by the primitive ontologies that allow them to solve the problems facing spontaneous collapse theories are also present in the wave function. But redundancy is not nonexistence; indeed, the fact that the relevant structures are already there in the wave function shows that the mass density ontology and the flash ontology exist whether they are explicitly postulated or not. By the same token, there is no need to decide between a wave function ontology, a mass density ontology and a flash ontology.
Abstract This chapter introduces the ‘primitive ontology’ approaches to the measurement problem, including spontaneous collapse models and the de Brolige-Bohm approach. I consider some possible epistemic problems that could arise in a primitive ontology approach, but ultimately conclude that primitive ontology approaches do appear to solve the epistemic version of the measurement problem. However, I note that there are good reasons to think the existing primitive ontology approaches cannot be extended to quantum field theory, thus motivating a search for alternatives beyond the primitive ontology paradigm. I also discuss the role of autonomy of scales in physics.
This note presents a concise and non-polemical comparison of several major interpretations of quantum mechanics, with a particular emphasis on the distinction between FAPP-solutions ("For All Practical Purposes'') versus ontological solutions to the measurement problem. Building on this distinction, we argue that the Contexts-Systems-Modalities (CSM) framework, supplemented by the operator-algebraic description of macroscopic contexts, provides a conceptually complete, non-FAPP ontology that naturally incorporates irreversibility and the physical structure of measurement devices. This approach differs significantly from other ontological interpretations such as Bohmian mechanics, spontaneous collapse, or many-worlds, and highlights the major role of contextual quantization in shaping quantum theory.