Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical

Conjugate dynamical systems: classical analogue of the quantum energy translation

Gabino Torres-Vega

Published May 9, 2012• 5 citations
Publisher

Abstract

An aspect of quantum mechanics that has not been fully understood is the energy shift generated by the time operator. In this study, we introduce the use of the eigensurfaces of dynamical variables and commutators in classical mechanics to study the classical analogue of the quantum translation of energy. We determine that there is a conjugate dynamical system that is conjugate to Hamilton's equations of motion, and then we generate the analogue of the time operator and use it in the translation of points along the energy direction, i.e. the classical analogue of the Pauli theorem. The theory is illustrated with a nonlinear oscillator model.

DOI
10.1088/1751-8113/45/21/215302

Related papers

Quantum mechanics in classical dynamics

Andrew C. Millard

Quantum mechanics over an associative ring with a conjugation operation can be recast in a form familiar as a classical dynamical system. The generators of transformations on the classical phase space are the expectation values of anti-self-adjoint operators and are closed under a Poisson bracket that is in direct correspondence with the quantum mechanical commutator. A prescription also exists for determining when a classical flow is equivalent to a quantum mechanical evolution.

Journal of Mathematical Physics•Dec 1, 1997•3 citations

Dissipation of classical energy in nonlinear quantum systems

Andrey Pereverzev, Yuriy V. Pereverzev, Oleg V. Prezhdo

We show using two simple nonlinear quantum systems that the infinite set of quantum dynamical variables, as introduced in quantized Hamilton dynamics [O. V. Prezhdo and Y. V. Pereverzev, J. Chem. Phys. 113, 6557 (2000)], behave as a thermostat with respect to the finite number of classical variables. The coherent classical component of the evolution decays by coupling to the chaotic quantum reservoir. The classical energy, understood as the part of system energy expressible through the average values of coordinates and momenta, is transferred to the quantum energy expressible through the higher moments of coordinates and momenta and other quantum variables. At long times, the classical variables reach equilibrium, and the classical energy fluctuates around the equilibrium value. These phenomena are illustrated with the exactly solvable Jaynes-Cummings model and a nonlinear oscillator.

The Journal of Chemical Physics•Apr 3, 2008•13 citations

A Method for Choosing an Initial Time Eigenstate in Classical and Quantum Systems

Gabino Torres-Vega, Mónica Noemí Jiménez-García

A subject of interest in classical and quantum mechanics is the development of the appropriate treatment of the time variable. In this paper we introduce a method of choosing the initial time eigensurface and how this method can be used to generate time-energy coordinates and, consequently, time-energy representations for classical and quantum systems.

Entropy•Jun 17, 2013•2 citations

Derivation of the relativistic ‘proper-time’ quantum evolution equations from canonical invariance

Moshe Shapiro

Based on (1) the spectral resolution of the energy operator; (2) the linearity of correspondence between physical observables and quantum self-adjoint operators; (3) the definition of conjugate coordinate–momentum variables in classical mechanics; and (4) the fact that the physical point in phase space remains unchanged under (canonical) transformations between one pair of conjugate variables to another, we are able to show that , the proper-time rest-energy transformation matrices, are given as a exp(−i E s t s /ℏ), from which we obtain the proper-time rest-energy evolution equation . For special relativistic situations this equation can be reduced to the usual dynamical equations, where t is the 'reference time' and E is the total energy. Extension of these equations to accelerating frames is then provided.

arXiv:0802.1063•Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical•Apr 15, 2008•4 citations

The Pauli Objection

Juan León, Lorenzo Maccone

Schrödinger's equation says that the Hamiltonian is the generator of time translations.This seems to imply that any reasonable definition of time operator must be conjugate to the Hamiltonian.Then both time and energy must have the same spectrum since conjugate operators are unitarily equivalent.Clearly this is not always true: normal Hamiltonians have lower bounded spectrum and often only have discrete eigenvalues, whereas we typically desire that time can take any real value.Pauli concluded that constructing a general a time operator is impossible (although clearly it can be done in specific cases).Here we show how the Pauli argument fails when one uses an external system (a "clock") to track time, so that time arises as correlations between the system and the clock (conditional probability amplitudes framework).In this case, the time operator is conjugate to the clock Hamiltonian and not to the system Hamiltonian, but its eigenvalues still satisfy the Schrödinger equation for arbitrary system Hamiltonians.

•Jan 1, 2017•22 citations

q-Equivalent Hamiltonian Operators

Mohsen Razavy

From the equation of motion and the canonical commutation relation for the position of a particle and its conjugate momentum, different first integrals of motion can be constructed. In addition to the proper Hamiltonian, there are other operators that can be considered as the generators of motion for the position operator (q-equivalent Hamiltonians). All of these operators have the same classical limit for the probability density of the coordinate of the particle, and many of them are symmetric and self-adjoint operators or have self-adjoint extensions. However, they do not satisfy the Heisenberg rule of quantization, and lead to incorrect commutation relations for velocity and position operators. Therefore, it is concluded that the energy first integral and the potential, rather than the equation of motion and the force law, are the physically significant operators in quantum mechanics.

Canadian Journal of Physics•Sep 1, 1972•19 citations
An aspect of quantum mechanics that has not been fully understood is the energy shift generated by the time operator. In this study, we introduce the use of the eigensurfaces of dynamical variables and commutators in classical mechanics to study the classical analogue of the quantum translation of energy. We determine that there is a conjugate dynamical system that is conjugate to Hamilton's equations of motion, and then we generate the analogue of the time operator and use it in the translation of points along the energy direction, i.e. the classical analogue of the Pauli theorem. The theory is illustrated with a nonlinear oscillator model.
We show using two simple nonlinear quantum systems that the infinite set of quantum dynamical variables, as introduced in quantized Hamilton dynamics [O. V. Prezhdo and Y. V. Pereverzev, J. Chem. Phys. 113, 6557 (2000)], behave as a thermostat with respect to the finite number of classical variables. The coherent classical component of the evolution decays by coupling to the chaotic quantum reservoir. The classical energy, understood as the part of system energy expressible through the average values of coordinates and momenta, is transferred to the quantum energy expressible through the higher moments of coordinates and momenta and other quantum variables. At long times, the classical variables reach equilibrium, and the classical energy fluctuates around the equilibrium value. These phenomena are illustrated with the exactly solvable Jaynes-Cummings model and a nonlinear oscillator.
Based on (1) the spectral resolution of the energy operator; (2) the linearity of correspondence between physical observables and quantum self-adjoint operators; (3) the definition of conjugate coordinate–momentum variables in classical mechanics; and (4) the fact that the physical point in phase space remains unchanged under (canonical) transformations between one pair of conjugate variables to another, we are able to show that , the proper-time rest-energy transformation matrices, are given as a exp(−i E s t s /ℏ), from which we obtain the proper-time rest-energy evolution equation . For special relativistic situations this equation can be reduced to the usual dynamical equations, where t is the 'reference time' and E is the total energy. Extension of these equations to accelerating frames is then provided.
Schrödinger's equation says that the Hamiltonian is the generator of time translations.This seems to imply that any reasonable definition of time operator must be conjugate to the Hamiltonian.Then both time and energy must have the same spectrum since conjugate operators are unitarily equivalent.Clearly this is not always true: normal Hamiltonians have lower bounded spectrum and often only have discrete eigenvalues, whereas we typically desire that time can take any real value.Pauli concluded that constructing a general a time operator is impossible (although clearly it can be done in specific cases).Here we show how the Pauli argument fails when one uses an external system (a "clock") to track time, so that time arises as correlations between the system and the clock (conditional probability amplitudes framework).In this case, the time operator is conjugate to the clock Hamiltonian and not to the system Hamiltonian, but its eigenvalues still satisfy the Schrödinger equation for arbitrary system Hamiltonians.
From the equation of motion and the canonical commutation relation for the position of a particle and its conjugate momentum, different first integrals of motion can be constructed. In addition to the proper Hamiltonian, there are other operators that can be considered as the generators of motion for the position operator (q-equivalent Hamiltonians). All of these operators have the same classical limit for the probability density of the coordinate of the particle, and many of them are symmetric and self-adjoint operators or have self-adjoint extensions. However, they do not satisfy the Heisenberg rule of quantization, and lead to incorrect commutation relations for velocity and position operators. Therefore, it is concluded that the energy first integral and the potential, rather than the equation of motion and the force law, are the physically significant operators in quantum mechanics.