Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Journal of Mathematical Physics

Quantum mechanics in classical dynamics

Andrew C. Millard

Published Dec 1, 1997• 3 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Quantum mechanics over an associative ring with a conjugation operation can be recast in a form familiar as a classical dynamical system. The generators of transformations on the classical phase space are the expectation values of anti-self-adjoint operators and are closed under a Poisson bracket that is in direct correspondence with the quantum mechanical commutator. A prescription also exists for determining when a classical flow is equivalent to a quantum mechanical evolution.

DOI
10.1063/1.532209

Related papers

Reviewing Observables in Classical and Quantum Mechanics

Roshan Raj

It presents the evolution of the quantum observables from their classical counterpart and distinctly analyses the meaning of observable in context to both the classical and the quantum realms, with an emphasis on W. Heisenberg's realization of observable and unobservable [1925]. It is stated that quantum observables are, in the first place, indeed distinctive to classical observables since each appears unobservable to the other; however, to associate physical essence as possessed by the latter, the expectation value of the former is determined. Further, the possibility of mapping quantum information to the classical ones through the action of the operator may be realized after re-interpreting analogies between the quantum commutator and Poisson brackets.

•Oct 10, 2023•0 citations

Formulation of the Classical Mechanics in the Ring of Operators

Abdullah Verçin

By making use of the Weyl-Wigner-Groenewold-Moyal association rules, a commutative product and a new quantum bracket are constructed in the ring of operators \cal{F}(H). In this way, an isomorphism between Lie algebra of classical observables (with Poisson bracket) and the Lie algebra of quantum observables with this new bracket is established. By these observations, a formulation of the classical mechanics in \cal{F}(H} is obtained and is shown to be \hbar\to 0 limit of the Heisenberg picture formulation of the quantum mechanics.

arXiv:quant-ph/9902064•Feb 18, 1999•1 citation

Algebra of quantum mechanics via classical phonons. II: Klein-Gordon dynamics, the Heisenberg formalism, the Dirac canonical commutation rule and the Poincare algebra through the continuous Poisson bracket formalism

Emmanuel Giner

In the first part of this series we have shown how the Schrodinger equation for a single particle and the corresponding non relativistic quantum observables can be obtained from a purely classical phonon model through the Newtonian equations of motion. In this work we focus instead on how the classical Hamiltonian formalism applied to the same phonon system allows to recover the feature of relativistic quantum mechanics for a single spinless particle. Using the classical nature of the phonon model, we naturally define continuous Poisson brackets between classical observables, which allows to recover the dynamics of such observables, i.e. the Ehrenfest relations associated to real-valued Klein-Gordon fields. The Poisson brackets also permits to obtain the generic form of constants of motions, thus generalizing the concept of inner products and momentum on Klein-Gordon fields. We then connect the formalism of real-valued classical functionals with that of hermitian operators and complex-valued wave functions. This is done through the introduction of a non-local complex-valued change of variables which allows to rewrite the real-valued Klein-Gordon equation in a form akin to the Schrodinger equation, and the classical observables as quantum expectation values. Then, we show how this change of variables allows to rewrite the classical Poisson brackets as commutators of hermitian operators. This points out the strict equivalence between the Heisenberg formalism and the formalism of classical Poisson bracket. Eventually, we illustrate how the Poisson brackets allows to recover the transformations of Poincare group in 1+1 dimension together with its algebra. The latter makes the link between the Lorentz invariant inner product of Mostafazadeh and the Casimir invariant associated to the mass of particle.

quant-pharXiv:2607.03909•Jul 7, 2026•0 citations

Measurement and self-adjoint operators

G.E. Johnson

The approximations of classical mechanics resulting from quantum mechanics are richer than a correspondence of classical dynamical variables with self-adjoint Hilbert space operators. Assertion that classical dynamic variables correspond to self-adjoint Hilbert space operators is disputable and sets unnatural limits on quantum mechanics. Well known examples of classical dynamical variables not associated with self-adjoint Hilbert space operators are discussed as a motivation for the realizations of quantum field theory that lack Hermitian field operators but exhibit interaction.

arXiv:1405.7224•May 28, 2014•3 citations

Geometric Transformations in Classical Phase Space and their Representation in Quantum Mechanics

Peter Krämer, G. John, D. Schenzle

The geometry of classical phase space is determined by the Poisson bracket of functions on phase space. Canonical transformations of the classical coordinates and momenta are defined by the property that the fundamental Poisson brackets be preserved. In this section we shall study in detail the linear canonical transformations in phase space and their representations in quantum mechanics. The reason for developing these concepts is twofold. First of all there are a number of geometric transformations common to classical and quantum mechanics which appear naturally in the analysis of many-body systems. Examples are rotations of the three space coordinates, permutations of single-particle coordinates and transformations to various types of relative vectors. To these we shall add translations of coordinates and momenta and construct the operators which represent these geometric transformations in the Hilbert space of quantum mechanics. The second reason for dealing with these transformations is the fact that certain operators encountered in quantum mechanics may be interpreted as representatives of underlying geometric transformations in classical phase space. This applies in particular to dilatation operators and to Gaussian interactions. Recognition of the underlying geometric transformation allows us to reduce operator multiplication to combination on the geometric level like matrix multiplication.

Vieweg+Teubner eBooks•Jan 1, 1981•0 citations

A review of the time-dependent variational principle

Peter Krämer

The time-dependent variational principle associates to a Hamiltonian quantum system a set of trajectories running on a classical phase space with canonical equations of motion. When the quantum observables generate a Lie group G and the states are taken as functions on an appropriate homogeneous quotient space space := G/G 0 under under G , they can be equipped with a classical Poisson bracket which reproduces the commutators of the Lie group. The quantum system maps into a classical system whose equations of motion are governed by the expectation value of the quantum Hamiltonian H. We consider examples of this construction and show that the analysis of generalized classical systems provides insight into quantum many-body dynamics like chemical reactions.

Journal of Physics Conference Series•Feb 1, 2008•37 citations
Quantum mechanics over an associative ring with a conjugation operation can be recast in a form familiar as a classical dynamical system. The generators of transformations on the classical phase space are the expectation values of anti-self-adjoint operators and are closed under a Poisson bracket that is in direct correspondence with the quantum mechanical commutator. A prescription also exists for determining when a classical flow is equivalent to a quantum mechanical evolution.
It presents the evolution of the quantum observables from their classical counterpart and distinctly analyses the meaning of observable in context to both the classical and the quantum realms, with an emphasis on W. Heisenberg's realization of observable and unobservable [1925]. It is stated that quantum observables are, in the first place, indeed distinctive to classical observables since each appears unobservable to the other; however, to associate physical essence as possessed by the latter, the expectation value of the former is determined. Further, the possibility of mapping quantum information to the classical ones through the action of the operator may be realized after re-interpreting analogies between the quantum commutator and Poisson brackets.
By making use of the Weyl-Wigner-Groenewold-Moyal association rules, a commutative product and a new quantum bracket are constructed in the ring of operators \cal{F}(H). In this way, an isomorphism between Lie algebra of classical observables (with Poisson bracket) and the Lie algebra of quantum observables with this new bracket is established. By these observations, a formulation of the classical mechanics in \cal{F}(H} is obtained and is shown to be \hbar\to 0 limit of the Heisenberg picture formulation of the quantum mechanics.
In the first part of this series we have shown how the Schrodinger equation for a single particle and the corresponding non relativistic quantum observables can be obtained from a purely classical phonon model through the Newtonian equations of motion. In this work we focus instead on how the classical Hamiltonian formalism applied to the same phonon system allows to recover the feature of relativistic quantum mechanics for a single spinless particle. Using the classical nature of the phonon model, we naturally define continuous Poisson brackets between classical observables, which allows to recover the dynamics of such observables, i.e. the Ehrenfest relations associated to real-valued Klein-Gordon fields. The Poisson brackets also permits to obtain the generic form of constants of motions, thus generalizing the concept of inner products and momentum on Klein-Gordon fields. We then connect the formalism of real-valued classical functionals with that of hermitian operators and complex-valued wave functions. This is done through the introduction of a non-local complex-valued change of variables which allows to rewrite the real-valued Klein-Gordon equation in a form akin to the Schrodinger equation, and the classical observables as quantum expectation values. Then, we show how this change of variables allows to rewrite the classical Poisson brackets as commutators of hermitian operators. This points out the strict equivalence between the Heisenberg formalism and the formalism of classical Poisson bracket. Eventually, we illustrate how the Poisson brackets allows to recover the transformations of Poincare group in 1+1 dimension together with its algebra. The latter makes the link between the Lorentz invariant inner product of Mostafazadeh and the Casimir invariant associated to the mass of particle.
The approximations of classical mechanics resulting from quantum mechanics are richer than a correspondence of classical dynamical variables with self-adjoint Hilbert space operators. Assertion that classical dynamic variables correspond to self-adjoint Hilbert space operators is disputable and sets unnatural limits on quantum mechanics. Well known examples of classical dynamical variables not associated with self-adjoint Hilbert space operators are discussed as a motivation for the realizations of quantum field theory that lack Hermitian field operators but exhibit interaction.
The geometry of classical phase space is determined by the Poisson bracket of functions on phase space. Canonical transformations of the classical coordinates and momenta are defined by the property that the fundamental Poisson brackets be preserved. In this section we shall study in detail the linear canonical transformations in phase space and their representations in quantum mechanics. The reason for developing these concepts is twofold. First of all there are a number of geometric transformations common to classical and quantum mechanics which appear naturally in the analysis of many-body systems. Examples are rotations of the three space coordinates, permutations of single-particle coordinates and transformations to various types of relative vectors. To these we shall add translations of coordinates and momenta and construct the operators which represent these geometric transformations in the Hilbert space of quantum mechanics. The second reason for dealing with these transformations is the fact that certain operators encountered in quantum mechanics may be interpreted as representatives of underlying geometric transformations in classical phase space. This applies in particular to dilatation operators and to Gaussian interactions. Recognition of the underlying geometric transformation allows us to reduce operator multiplication to combination on the geometric level like matrix multiplication.
The time-dependent variational principle associates to a Hamiltonian quantum system a set of trajectories running on a classical phase space with canonical equations of motion. When the quantum observables generate a Lie group G and the states are taken as functions on an appropriate homogeneous quotient space space := G/G 0 under under G , they can be equipped with a classical Poisson bracket which reproduces the commutators of the Lie group. The quantum system maps into a classical system whose equations of motion are governed by the expectation value of the quantum Hamiltonian H. We consider examples of this construction and show that the analysis of generalized classical systems provides insight into quantum many-body dynamics like chemical reactions.