Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Generalized Uncertainty Principle

Saurav Dwivedi

Published Nov 1, 2010• 11 citations
OpenAlex

Abstract

Quantum theory brought an irreducible lawlessness in physics. This is accompanied by lack of specification of state of a system. We can not measure states even though they ever existed. We can measure only transition from one state into another. We deduce this lack of determination of state mathematically, and thus provide formalism for maximum precision of determination of mixed states. However, the results thus obtained show consistency with Heisenberg's uncertainty relations.

Related papers

Uncertainty principle of quantum processes

Yunlong Xiao, Kuntal Sengupta, Siren Yang +1 more

Heisenberg's uncertainty principle, which imposes intrinsic restrictions on our ability to predict the outcomes of incompatible quantum measurements to arbitrary precision, demonstrates one of the key differences between classical and quantum mechanics.The physical systems considered in the uncertainty principle are static in nature and described mathematically with a quantum state in a Hilbert space.However, many physical systems are dynamic in nature and described with the formalism of a quantum channel.In this paper, we show that the uncertainty principle can be reformulated to include process measurements that are performed on quantum channels.Since both the preparation of quantum states and the implementation of quantum measurements are themselves special cases of quantum channels, our formalism encapsulates the uncertainty principle in its utmost generality.More specifically, we obtain expressions that generalize the Maassen-Uffink uncertainty relation and the universal uncertainty relations from quantum states to quantum channels.

arXiv:2004.05315•Physical Review Research•Apr 28, 2021•15 citations

The Wave Function, Expectations Values, and Uncertainty

Nelson Enrique Bolivar, Gabriel Abellán

The uncertainty principle, formulated by Heisenberg in 1927, is a fundamental principle in quantum mechanics. It forces us to review key concepts of classical physics, and from this analysis are born the concepts of quantum physics. Consequences of the Uncertainty principle also introduces the concept of incompatible sizes, a completely new concept compared to classical physics. A state of the system, which we call a quantum state, will be determined from the knowledge of a set maximum of certain quantities that are independent and compatible with each other. A measurable physical quantity is called an observable. If at a given moment a measurement is performed by one or more compatible observables it is said they are performing an observation of the system. The basic principles of quantum mechanics are expressed by a number of postulates. Their numbers and can vary from one text to another.

Apple Academic Press eBooks•May 23, 2018•0 citations

Temporal Symmetry of Quantum Uncertainty: A Reinterpretation of the Heisenberg Principle

Justin L Dickinson

The Heisenberg uncertainty principle is conventionally interpreted as a constraint on the precision of future measurement outcomes. We argue that this temporal asymmetry is not justified by the underlying mathematics of quantum mechanics, which is fundamentally time-symmetric. We propose that uncertainty applies equally in both temporal directions: the past has no greater ontological determinacy than the future. Between collapse events, prior states were no more determined than future states are now. Only the present moment of collapse constitutes anything approaching a definite physical state, and that moment is immediately receding into a past that was never fully determined before collapse occurred. We formalize this interpretation through a timesymmetric reading of the existing uncertainty relations and discuss its implications for the ontological status of the past, the measurement problem, and the foundations of physical determinism.

•Feb 25, 2026•0 citations

Generalized uncertainty relations

Robert Warren Finkel

The mathematical content of the uncertainty principle is contained in special states akin to, and including, states of minimum uncertainty. Specific uncertainty relations are produced by averaging observables in these states. The approach is shown to give more flexible and complete expressions of indeterminacy than the familiar generalized Heisenberg inequality: statistical measures other than variances can be employed, the method is not limited to describing uncertainties in terms of products of statistical dispersions, and the resulting inequalities have the most stringent bounds attainable independent of the system state. Applications are then made to find uncertainty relations for position-momentum average displacements from the means, time-energy indeterminacy, and uncertainties in angular momentum components.

Physical Review A•Feb 1, 1987•37 citations

Anti Heisenberg—Refutation Of Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Relation

Ilija Barukčić, Andrei Yu. Khrennikov, Gregg S. Jaeger +2 more

The quantum mechanical uncertainty principle for position and momentum plays an important role in many treatments on the (philosophical, physical and other) implications of quantum mechanics. Roughly speaking, the more precisely the momentum (position) of a (quantum mechanical) object is given, the less precisely can one say what its position (momentum) is. This quantum mechanical measurement problem is not just an interpretational difficulty, it raises broader issues as well. The measurement (of a property) of a (quantum mechanical) object determines the existence of the measured. In brief, the quantum mechanical uncertainty principle challenges some fundamental principles of Science and especially the principle of causality. In particular, an independently existing (external) objective reality is denied. As we shall see, that the quantum mechanical uncertainty principle for position and momentum is based on the assumption that 1⩽0, which is a logical contradiction.

AIP conference proceedings•Jan 1, 2011•0 citations

Anti Heisenberg—Refutation Of Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Relation

Ilija Barukčić

The quantum mechanical uncertainty principle for position and momentum plays an important role in many treatments on the (philosophical, physical and other) implications of quantum mechanics. Roughly speaking, the more precisely the momentum (position) of a (quantum mechanical) object is given, the less precisely can one say what its position (momentum) is. This quantum mechanical measurement problem is not just an interpretational difficulty, it raises broader issues as well. The measurement (of a property) of a (quantum mechanical) object determines the existence of the measured. In brief, the quantum mechanical uncertainty principle challenges some fundamental principles of Science and especially the principle of causality. In particular, an independently existing (external) objective reality is denied. As we shall see, that the quantum mechanical uncertainty principle for position and momentum is based on the assumption that 1⩽0, which is a logical contradiction.

AIP conference proceedings•Jan 1, 2011•15 citations
Quantum theory brought an irreducible lawlessness in physics. This is accompanied by lack of specification of state of a system. We can not measure states even though they ever existed. We can measure only transition from one state into another. We deduce this lack of determination of state mathematically, and thus provide formalism for maximum precision of determination of mixed states. However, the results thus obtained show consistency with Heisenberg's uncertainty relations.
Heisenberg's uncertainty principle, which imposes intrinsic restrictions on our ability to predict the outcomes of incompatible quantum measurements to arbitrary precision, demonstrates one of the key differences between classical and quantum mechanics.The physical systems considered in the uncertainty principle are static in nature and described mathematically with a quantum state in a Hilbert space.However, many physical systems are dynamic in nature and described with the formalism of a quantum channel.In this paper, we show that the uncertainty principle can be reformulated to include process measurements that are performed on quantum channels.Since both the preparation of quantum states and the implementation of quantum measurements are themselves special cases of quantum channels, our formalism encapsulates the uncertainty principle in its utmost generality.More specifically, we obtain expressions that generalize the Maassen-Uffink uncertainty relation and the universal uncertainty relations from quantum states to quantum channels.
The uncertainty principle, formulated by Heisenberg in 1927, is a fundamental principle in quantum mechanics. It forces us to review key concepts of classical physics, and from this analysis are born the concepts of quantum physics. Consequences of the Uncertainty principle also introduces the concept of incompatible sizes, a completely new concept compared to classical physics. A state of the system, which we call a quantum state, will be determined from the knowledge of a set maximum of certain quantities that are independent and compatible with each other. A measurable physical quantity is called an observable. If at a given moment a measurement is performed by one or more compatible observables it is said they are performing an observation of the system. The basic principles of quantum mechanics are expressed by a number of postulates. Their numbers and can vary from one text to another.
The Heisenberg uncertainty principle is conventionally interpreted as a constraint on the precision of future measurement outcomes. We argue that this temporal asymmetry is not justified by the underlying mathematics of quantum mechanics, which is fundamentally time-symmetric. We propose that uncertainty applies equally in both temporal directions: the past has no greater ontological determinacy than the future. Between collapse events, prior states were no more determined than future states are now. Only the present moment of collapse constitutes anything approaching a definite physical state, and that moment is immediately receding into a past that was never fully determined before collapse occurred. We formalize this interpretation through a timesymmetric reading of the existing uncertainty relations and discuss its implications for the ontological status of the past, the measurement problem, and the foundations of physical determinism.
The mathematical content of the uncertainty principle is contained in special states akin to, and including, states of minimum uncertainty. Specific uncertainty relations are produced by averaging observables in these states. The approach is shown to give more flexible and complete expressions of indeterminacy than the familiar generalized Heisenberg inequality: statistical measures other than variances can be employed, the method is not limited to describing uncertainties in terms of products of statistical dispersions, and the resulting inequalities have the most stringent bounds attainable independent of the system state. Applications are then made to find uncertainty relations for position-momentum average displacements from the means, time-energy indeterminacy, and uncertainties in angular momentum components.
The quantum mechanical uncertainty principle for position and momentum plays an important role in many treatments on the (philosophical, physical and other) implications of quantum mechanics. Roughly speaking, the more precisely the momentum (position) of a (quantum mechanical) object is given, the less precisely can one say what its position (momentum) is. This quantum mechanical measurement problem is not just an interpretational difficulty, it raises broader issues as well. The measurement (of a property) of a (quantum mechanical) object determines the existence of the measured. In brief, the quantum mechanical uncertainty principle challenges some fundamental principles of Science and especially the principle of causality. In particular, an independently existing (external) objective reality is denied. As we shall see, that the quantum mechanical uncertainty principle for position and momentum is based on the assumption that 1⩽0, which is a logical contradiction.
The quantum mechanical uncertainty principle for position and momentum plays an important role in many treatments on the (philosophical, physical and other) implications of quantum mechanics. Roughly speaking, the more precisely the momentum (position) of a (quantum mechanical) object is given, the less precisely can one say what its position (momentum) is. This quantum mechanical measurement problem is not just an interpretational difficulty, it raises broader issues as well. The measurement (of a property) of a (quantum mechanical) object determines the existence of the measured. In brief, the quantum mechanical uncertainty principle challenges some fundamental principles of Science and especially the principle of causality. In particular, an independently existing (external) objective reality is denied. As we shall see, that the quantum mechanical uncertainty principle for position and momentum is based on the assumption that 1⩽0, which is a logical contradiction.