Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physical Review A

Generalized uncertainty relations

Robert Warren Finkel

Published Feb 1, 1987• 37 citations
Publisher

Abstract

The mathematical content of the uncertainty principle is contained in special states akin to, and including, states of minimum uncertainty. Specific uncertainty relations are produced by averaging observables in these states. The approach is shown to give more flexible and complete expressions of indeterminacy than the familiar generalized Heisenberg inequality: statistical measures other than variances can be employed, the method is not limited to describing uncertainties in terms of products of statistical dispersions, and the resulting inequalities have the most stringent bounds attainable independent of the system state. Applications are then made to find uncertainty relations for position-momentum average displacements from the means, time-energy indeterminacy, and uncertainties in angular momentum components.

DOI
10.1103/physreva.35.1486

Related papers

Exact uncertainty relations

Michael J. W. Hall

The Heisenberg inequality $\ensuremath{\Delta}X\ensuremath{\Delta}P>~\ensuremath{\Elzxh}/2$ can be replaced by an exact equality, for suitably chosen measures of position and momentum uncertainty, which is valid for all wave functions. The statistics of complementary observables are thus connected by an ``exact'' uncertainty relation. Results may be generalized to angular momentum and phase, photon number and phase, time and frequency, and to states described by density operators. Connections to energy bounds, entanglement, Wigner functions, and optimal estimation of an observable from the measurement of a second observable are also given.

arXiv:quant-ph/0107149•Physical Review A•Oct 4, 2001•89 citations

Exact uncertainty relations: technical details

Michael J. W. Hall

The Heisenberg inequality ΔX ΔP \geq \hbar/2 can be replaced by an exact equality, for suitably chosen measures of position and momentum uncertainty, which is valid for all wavefunctions. The significance of this "exact" uncertainty relation is discussed, and results are generalised to angular momentum and phase, photon number and phase, time and frequency, and to states described by density operators. Connections to optimal estimation of an observable from the measurement of a second observable, Wigner functions, energy bounds, and entanglement are also given.

arXiv:quant-ph/0103072•Mar 14, 2001•0 citations

Variance-Based Uncertainty Relations: A Concise Review of Inequalities Discovered Since 1927

V. V. Dodonov

A brief review of various existing mathematical formulations of the uncertainty relations in quantum mechanics, containing variances of two or more non-commuting operators, is given. In particular, inequalities for the products of higher-order moments of a coordinate and a momentum are considered, as well as inequalities making the uncertainty relations more accurate when additional information about a quantum system is available (for example, the correlation coefficient or the degree of mixing of a quantum state characterized by the trace of the squared statistical operator). The special cases of two, three, and four operators are discussed in detail.

Quantum Reports•Aug 5, 2025•4 citations

Uncertainty relations: a small zoo of remarkable inequalities discovered since 1927

V. V. Dodonov

A concise review of various mathematical formulations of the uncertainty relations in quantum mechanics discovered since 1927 is given. Besides the traditional Heisenberg inequality, the modifications made by Schrödinger and Robertson, as well as generalizations to sets of several noncommuting operators, are considered. The "entropic" inequalities and "local" uncertainty relations, together with inequalities which connect the so-called total width and the mean peak width of a wave function, are discussed. Inequalities for the products of higher order moments of the coordinate and momentum are presented. Inequalities making the uncertainty relations more accurate when the "purity" of a quantum state is fixed are demonstrated. Diverse formulations of the energy-time uncertainty relations are considered.

quant-pharXiv:2603.07293•Revista Brasileira de Ensino de Física•Mar 10, 2026•1 citation

Measurement uncertainty relations

Paul Busch, PEKKA J. LAHTI, Reinhard F. Werner

Measurement uncertainty relations are quantitative bounds on the errors in an approximate joint measurement of two observables. They can be seen as a generalization of the error/disturbance tradeoff first discussed heuristically by Heisenberg. Here we prove such relations for the case of two canonically conjugate observables like position and momentum, and establish a close connection with the more familiar preparation uncertainty relations constraining the sharpness of the distributions of the two observables in the same state. Both sets of relations are generalized to means of order α rather than the usual quadratic means, and we show that the optimal constants are the same for preparation and for measurement uncertainty. The constants are determined numerically and compared with some bounds in the literature. In both cases, the near-saturation of the inequalities entails that the state (resp. observable) is uniformly close to a minimizing one.

arXiv:1312.4392•Journal of Mathematical Physics•Apr 1, 2014•88 citations

Generalizing the Heisenberg uncertainty relation

Eric D. Chisolm

The proof of the Heisenberg uncertainty relation is modified to produce two improvements: (a) The resulting inequality is stronger because it includes the covariance between the two observables, and (b) the proof lifts certain restrictions on the state to which the relation is applied, increasing its generality. The restrictions necessary for the standard inequality to apply are not widely known, and they are discussed in detail. The classical analog of the Heisenberg relation is also derived, and the two are compared. Finally, the modified relation is used to address the apparent paradox that eigenfunctions of the z component of angular momentum Lz do not satisfy the φ–Lz Heisenberg relation; the resolution is that the restrictions mentioned above make the usual inequality inapplicable to these states. The modified relation does apply, however, and it is shown to be consistent with explicit calculations.

arXiv:quant-ph/0011115•American Journal of Physics•Mar 1, 2001•55 citations
The mathematical content of the uncertainty principle is contained in special states akin to, and including, states of minimum uncertainty. Specific uncertainty relations are produced by averaging observables in these states. The approach is shown to give more flexible and complete expressions of indeterminacy than the familiar generalized Heisenberg inequality: statistical measures other than variances can be employed, the method is not limited to describing uncertainties in terms of products of statistical dispersions, and the resulting inequalities have the most stringent bounds attainable independent of the system state. Applications are then made to find uncertainty relations for position-momentum average displacements from the means, time-energy indeterminacy, and uncertainties in angular momentum components.
The Heisenberg inequality $\ensuremath{\Delta}X\ensuremath{\Delta}P>~\ensuremath{\Elzxh}/2$ can be replaced by an exact equality, for suitably chosen measures of position and momentum uncertainty, which is valid for all wave functions. The statistics of complementary observables are thus connected by an ``exact'' uncertainty relation. Results may be generalized to angular momentum and phase, photon number and phase, time and frequency, and to states described by density operators. Connections to energy bounds, entanglement, Wigner functions, and optimal estimation of an observable from the measurement of a second observable are also given.
The Heisenberg inequality ΔX ΔP \geq \hbar/2 can be replaced by an exact equality, for suitably chosen measures of position and momentum uncertainty, which is valid for all wavefunctions. The significance of this "exact" uncertainty relation is discussed, and results are generalised to angular momentum and phase, photon number and phase, time and frequency, and to states described by density operators. Connections to optimal estimation of an observable from the measurement of a second observable, Wigner functions, energy bounds, and entanglement are also given.
A brief review of various existing mathematical formulations of the uncertainty relations in quantum mechanics, containing variances of two or more non-commuting operators, is given. In particular, inequalities for the products of higher-order moments of a coordinate and a momentum are considered, as well as inequalities making the uncertainty relations more accurate when additional information about a quantum system is available (for example, the correlation coefficient or the degree of mixing of a quantum state characterized by the trace of the squared statistical operator). The special cases of two, three, and four operators are discussed in detail.
A concise review of various mathematical formulations of the uncertainty relations in quantum mechanics discovered since 1927 is given. Besides the traditional Heisenberg inequality, the modifications made by Schrödinger and Robertson, as well as generalizations to sets of several noncommuting operators, are considered. The "entropic" inequalities and "local" uncertainty relations, together with inequalities which connect the so-called total width and the mean peak width of a wave function, are discussed. Inequalities for the products of higher order moments of the coordinate and momentum are presented. Inequalities making the uncertainty relations more accurate when the "purity" of a quantum state is fixed are demonstrated. Diverse formulations of the energy-time uncertainty relations are considered.
Measurement uncertainty relations are quantitative bounds on the errors in an approximate joint measurement of two observables. They can be seen as a generalization of the error/disturbance tradeoff first discussed heuristically by Heisenberg. Here we prove such relations for the case of two canonically conjugate observables like position and momentum, and establish a close connection with the more familiar preparation uncertainty relations constraining the sharpness of the distributions of the two observables in the same state. Both sets of relations are generalized to means of order α rather than the usual quadratic means, and we show that the optimal constants are the same for preparation and for measurement uncertainty. The constants are determined numerically and compared with some bounds in the literature. In both cases, the near-saturation of the inequalities entails that the state (resp. observable) is uniformly close to a minimizing one.
The proof of the Heisenberg uncertainty relation is modified to produce two improvements: (a) The resulting inequality is stronger because it includes the covariance between the two observables, and (b) the proof lifts certain restrictions on the state to which the relation is applied, increasing its generality. The restrictions necessary for the standard inequality to apply are not widely known, and they are discussed in detail. The classical analog of the Heisenberg relation is also derived, and the two are compared. Finally, the modified relation is used to address the apparent paradox that eigenfunctions of the z component of angular momentum Lz do not satisfy the φ–Lz Heisenberg relation; the resolution is that the restrictions mentioned above make the usual inequality inapplicable to these states. The modified relation does apply, however, and it is shown to be consistent with explicit calculations.