Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Brazilian Journal of Physics

A new form of path integral for the coherent states representation and its semiclassical limit

Luana Carolina Santos, Marcus A. M. de Aguiar

Published Mar 1, 2005• 4 citations
Publisher

Abstract

The overcompleteness of the coherent states basis leads to a multiplicity of representations of Feynman's path integral. These different representations, although equivalent quantum mechanically, lead to different semiclassical limits. Two such semiclassical formulas were derived in [1] for the two corresponding path integral forms suggested by Klauder and Skagerstan in [2]. Each of these formulas involve trajectories governed by a different classical representation of the Hamiltonian operator: the P representation in one case and the Q representation in other. In this paper we construct a third representation of the path integral whose semiclassical limit involves directly the Weyl representation of the Hamiltonian operator, i.e., the classical Hamiltonian itself.

DOI
10.1590/s0103-97332005000100015

Related papers

A New Form of Path Integral for the Coherent States Representation and its Semiclassical Limit

Luis C. dos Santos, Marcus A. M. de Aguiar

The overcompleteness of the coherent states basis leads to a multiplicity of representations of Feynman's path integral. These different representations, although equivalent quantum mechanically, lead to different semiclassical limits. Two such semiclassical formulas were derived in \cite{Bar01} for the two corresponding path integral forms suggested by Klauder and Skagerstan in \cite{Klau85}. Each of these formulas involve trajectories governed by a different classical representation of the Hamiltonian operator: the P representation in one case and the Q representation in other. In this paper we construct a third representation of the path integral whose semiclassical limit involves directly the Weyl representation of the Hamiltonian operator, i.e., the classical Hamiltonian itself.

arXiv:quant-ph/0412080•Dec 10, 2004•0 citations

Coherent state path integrals in the Weyl representation

Luana Carolina Santos, Marcus A. M. de Aguiar

We construct a representation of the coherent state path integral using the Weyl symbol of the Hamiltonian operator. This representation is very different from the usual path integral forms suggested by Klauder and Skagerstam (1985 Coherent States: Applications in Physics and Mathematical Physics (Singapore: World Scientific)), which involve the normal or the antinormal ordering of the Hamiltonian. These different representations, although equivalent quantum mechanically, lead to different semiclassical limits. We show that the semiclassical limit of the coherent state propagator in the Weyl representation involves classical trajectories that are independent of the width of coherent states. This propagator is also free from the phase corrections found in Baranger et al ( 2001 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 34 7227 ) for the two Klauder forms and provides an explicit connection between the Wigner and the Husimi representations of the evolution operator.

arXiv:quant-ph/0607136•Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General•Oct 10, 2006•16 citations

Semiclassical approximations in phase space with coherent states

Michel Baranger, Marcus A. M. de Aguiar, F Keck +2 more

We present a complete derivation of the semiclassical limit of the coherent-state propagator in one dimension, starting from path integrals in phase space. We show that the arbitrariness in the path integral representation, which follows from the overcompleteness of the coherent states, results in many different semiclassical limits. We explicitly derive two possible semiclassical formulae for the propagator, we suggest a third one, and we discuss their relationships. We also derive an initial-value representation for the semiclassical propagator, based on an initial Gaussian wavepacket. It turns out to be related to, but different from, Heller's thawed Gaussian approximation. It is very different from the Herman-Kluk formula, which is not a correct semiclassical limit. We point out errors in two derivations of the latter. Finally we show how the semiclassical coherent-state propagators lead to WKB-type quantization rules and to approximations for the Husimi distributions of stationary states.

arXiv:quant-ph/0105153•Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General•Sep 3, 2001•176 citations

Constructing measures for path integrals

Ingrid C. Daubechies, John R. Klauder

The overcompleteness of the coherent states for the Heisenberg–Weyl group implies that many different integral kernels can be used to represent the same operator. Within such an equivalence class we construct an integral kernel to represent the quantum-mechanical evolution operator for certain dynamical systems in the form of a path integral that involves genuine (Wiener) measures on continuous phase-space paths. To achieve this goal it is necessary to employ an expression for the classical action different from the usual one.

Journal of Mathematical Physics•Oct 1, 1982•15 citations

On the stationary phase evaluation of path integrals in the coherent states representation

Yitzhak Weissman

The extremal paths that arise in the stationary phase evaluation of coherent state path integrals do not seem to have a simple physical interpretation, in contrast to the extremal paths that occur in the conventional path integrals. On the other hand, a recently derived semiclassical formula for the coherent state propagator involves a path that is determined in exactly the same manner as the extremal paths of the conventional path integrals. Since both the semiclassical and the stationary phase analyses yield asymptotic (h(cross) to 0) approximations, the stationary phase and the semiclassical expressions for the propagator should be identical. The author presents a simple and direct proof that, in spite of the apparent differences, this is indeed the case. The simplification in the semiclassical formula is due to the utilisation of an appropriate set of canonical variables to describe the classical dynamics. In order to illustrate the usefulness of the semiclassical formula they present an application to the problem of the degenerate parametric amplifier, which had been treated before by operator ordering and path integral methods. The semiclassical approach has a simple classical interpretation that is absent in the alternative treatments.

Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General•Aug 21, 1983•37 citations

The Weyl correspondence and path integrals

Maurice M. Mizrahi

The method of Weyl transforms is used to rigorously derive path integral forms for position and momentum transition amplitudes from the time-dependent Schrödinger equation for arbitrary Hermitian Hamiltonians. It is found that all paths in phase space contribute equally in magnitude, but that each path has a different phase, equal to 1/h/ times an ’’effective action’’ taken along it. The latter is the time integral of p⋅q̇−h (p,q), h (p,q) being the Weyl transform of the Hamiltonian operator H, which differs from the classical Hamiltonian function by terms of order h/2, vanishing in the classical limit. These terms, which can be explicitly computed, are zero for relatively simple Hamiltonians, such as (1/2M)[P−eA (Q)]2+V (Q), but appear when the coupling of the position and momentum operators is stronger, such as for a relativistic spinless particle in an electromagnetic field, or when configuration space is curved. They are always zero if one opts for Weyl’s rule for forming the quantum operator corresponding to a given classical Hamiltonian. The transition amplitude between two position states is found to be expressible as a path integral in configuration space alone only in very special cases, such as when the Hamiltonian is quadratic in the momenta.

Journal of Mathematical Physics•Nov 1, 1975•134 citations
The overcompleteness of the coherent states basis leads to a multiplicity of representations of Feynman's path integral. These different representations, although equivalent quantum mechanically, lead to different semiclassical limits. Two such semiclassical formulas were derived in [1] for the two corresponding path integral forms suggested by Klauder and Skagerstan in [2]. Each of these formulas involve trajectories governed by a different classical representation of the Hamiltonian operator: the P representation in one case and the Q representation in other. In this paper we construct a third representation of the path integral whose semiclassical limit involves directly the Weyl representation of the Hamiltonian operator, i.e., the classical Hamiltonian itself.
The overcompleteness of the coherent states basis leads to a multiplicity of representations of Feynman's path integral. These different representations, although equivalent quantum mechanically, lead to different semiclassical limits. Two such semiclassical formulas were derived in \cite{Bar01} for the two corresponding path integral forms suggested by Klauder and Skagerstan in \cite{Klau85}. Each of these formulas involve trajectories governed by a different classical representation of the Hamiltonian operator: the P representation in one case and the Q representation in other. In this paper we construct a third representation of the path integral whose semiclassical limit involves directly the Weyl representation of the Hamiltonian operator, i.e., the classical Hamiltonian itself.
We construct a representation of the coherent state path integral using the Weyl symbol of the Hamiltonian operator. This representation is very different from the usual path integral forms suggested by Klauder and Skagerstam (1985 Coherent States: Applications in Physics and Mathematical Physics (Singapore: World Scientific)), which involve the normal or the antinormal ordering of the Hamiltonian. These different representations, although equivalent quantum mechanically, lead to different semiclassical limits. We show that the semiclassical limit of the coherent state propagator in the Weyl representation involves classical trajectories that are independent of the width of coherent states. This propagator is also free from the phase corrections found in Baranger et al ( 2001 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 34 7227 ) for the two Klauder forms and provides an explicit connection between the Wigner and the Husimi representations of the evolution operator.
We present a complete derivation of the semiclassical limit of the coherent-state propagator in one dimension, starting from path integrals in phase space. We show that the arbitrariness in the path integral representation, which follows from the overcompleteness of the coherent states, results in many different semiclassical limits. We explicitly derive two possible semiclassical formulae for the propagator, we suggest a third one, and we discuss their relationships. We also derive an initial-value representation for the semiclassical propagator, based on an initial Gaussian wavepacket. It turns out to be related to, but different from, Heller's thawed Gaussian approximation. It is very different from the Herman-Kluk formula, which is not a correct semiclassical limit. We point out errors in two derivations of the latter. Finally we show how the semiclassical coherent-state propagators lead to WKB-type quantization rules and to approximations for the Husimi distributions of stationary states.
The overcompleteness of the coherent states for the Heisenberg–Weyl group implies that many different integral kernels can be used to represent the same operator. Within such an equivalence class we construct an integral kernel to represent the quantum-mechanical evolution operator for certain dynamical systems in the form of a path integral that involves genuine (Wiener) measures on continuous phase-space paths. To achieve this goal it is necessary to employ an expression for the classical action different from the usual one.
The extremal paths that arise in the stationary phase evaluation of coherent state path integrals do not seem to have a simple physical interpretation, in contrast to the extremal paths that occur in the conventional path integrals. On the other hand, a recently derived semiclassical formula for the coherent state propagator involves a path that is determined in exactly the same manner as the extremal paths of the conventional path integrals. Since both the semiclassical and the stationary phase analyses yield asymptotic (h(cross) to 0) approximations, the stationary phase and the semiclassical expressions for the propagator should be identical. The author presents a simple and direct proof that, in spite of the apparent differences, this is indeed the case. The simplification in the semiclassical formula is due to the utilisation of an appropriate set of canonical variables to describe the classical dynamics. In order to illustrate the usefulness of the semiclassical formula they present an application to the problem of the degenerate parametric amplifier, which had been treated before by operator ordering and path integral methods. The semiclassical approach has a simple classical interpretation that is absent in the alternative treatments.
The method of Weyl transforms is used to rigorously derive path integral forms for position and momentum transition amplitudes from the time-dependent Schrödinger equation for arbitrary Hermitian Hamiltonians. It is found that all paths in phase space contribute equally in magnitude, but that each path has a different phase, equal to 1/h/ times an ’’effective action’’ taken along it. The latter is the time integral of p⋅q̇−h (p,q), h (p,q) being the Weyl transform of the Hamiltonian operator H, which differs from the classical Hamiltonian function by terms of order h/2, vanishing in the classical limit. These terms, which can be explicitly computed, are zero for relatively simple Hamiltonians, such as (1/2M)[P−eA (Q)]2+V (Q), but appear when the coupling of the position and momentum operators is stronger, such as for a relativistic spinless particle in an electromagnetic field, or when configuration space is curved. They are always zero if one opts for Weyl’s rule for forming the quantum operator corresponding to a given classical Hamiltonian. The transition amplitude between two position states is found to be expressible as a path integral in configuration space alone only in very special cases, such as when the Hamiltonian is quadratic in the momenta.