Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:quant-ph/0607136 · Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General

Coherent state path integrals in the Weyl representation

Luana Carolina Santos, Marcus A. M. de Aguiar

Published Oct 10, 2006• 16 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

We construct a representation of the coherent state path integral using the Weyl symbol of the Hamiltonian operator. This representation is very different from the usual path integral forms suggested by Klauder and Skagerstam (1985 Coherent States: Applications in Physics and Mathematical Physics (Singapore: World Scientific)), which involve the normal or the antinormal ordering of the Hamiltonian. These different representations, although equivalent quantum mechanically, lead to different semiclassical limits. We show that the semiclassical limit of the coherent state propagator in the Weyl representation involves classical trajectories that are independent of the width of coherent states. This propagator is also free from the phase corrections found in Baranger et al ( 2001 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 34 7227 ) for the two Klauder forms and provides an explicit connection between the Wigner and the Husimi representations of the evolution operator.

DOI
10.1088/0305-4470/39/43/006

Related papers

A New Form of Path Integral for the Coherent States Representation and its Semiclassical Limit

Luis C. dos Santos, Marcus A. M. de Aguiar

The overcompleteness of the coherent states basis leads to a multiplicity of representations of Feynman's path integral. These different representations, although equivalent quantum mechanically, lead to different semiclassical limits. Two such semiclassical formulas were derived in \cite{Bar01} for the two corresponding path integral forms suggested by Klauder and Skagerstan in \cite{Klau85}. Each of these formulas involve trajectories governed by a different classical representation of the Hamiltonian operator: the P representation in one case and the Q representation in other. In this paper we construct a third representation of the path integral whose semiclassical limit involves directly the Weyl representation of the Hamiltonian operator, i.e., the classical Hamiltonian itself.

arXiv:quant-ph/0412080•Dec 10, 2004•0 citations

A new form of path integral for the coherent states representation and its semiclassical limit

Luana Carolina Santos, Marcus A. M. de Aguiar

The overcompleteness of the coherent states basis leads to a multiplicity of representations of Feynman's path integral. These different representations, although equivalent quantum mechanically, lead to different semiclassical limits. Two such semiclassical formulas were derived in [1] for the two corresponding path integral forms suggested by Klauder and Skagerstan in [2]. Each of these formulas involve trajectories governed by a different classical representation of the Hamiltonian operator: the P representation in one case and the Q representation in other. In this paper we construct a third representation of the path integral whose semiclassical limit involves directly the Weyl representation of the Hamiltonian operator, i.e., the classical Hamiltonian itself.

Brazilian Journal of Physics•Mar 1, 2005•4 citations

Semiclassical approximations in phase space with coherent states

Michel Baranger, Marcus A. M. de Aguiar, F Keck +2 more

We present a complete derivation of the semiclassical limit of the coherent-state propagator in one dimension, starting from path integrals in phase space. We show that the arbitrariness in the path integral representation, which follows from the overcompleteness of the coherent states, results in many different semiclassical limits. We explicitly derive two possible semiclassical formulae for the propagator, we suggest a third one, and we discuss their relationships. We also derive an initial-value representation for the semiclassical propagator, based on an initial Gaussian wavepacket. It turns out to be related to, but different from, Heller's thawed Gaussian approximation. It is very different from the Herman-Kluk formula, which is not a correct semiclassical limit. We point out errors in two derivations of the latter. Finally we show how the semiclassical coherent-state propagators lead to WKB-type quantization rules and to approximations for the Husimi distributions of stationary states.

arXiv:quant-ph/0105153•Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General•Sep 3, 2001•176 citations

The semiclassical coherent state propagator in the Weyl representation

Carol Braun, Feifei Li, Anupam Garg +1 more

It is shown that the semiclassical coherent state propagator takes its simplest form when the quantum mechanical Hamiltonian is replaced by its Weyl symbol in defining the classical action, in that there is then no need for a Solari-Kochetov correction. It is also shown that such a correction exists if a symbol other than the Weyl symbol is chosen and that its form is different depending on the symbol chosen. The various forms of the propagator based on different symbols are shown to be equivalent provided the correspondingly correct Solari-Kochetov correction is included. All these results are shown for both particle and spin coherent state propagators. The global anomaly in the fluctuation determinant is further elucidated by a study of the connection between the discrete fluctuation determinant and the discrete Jacobi equation.

arXiv:1509.01640•Journal of Mathematical Physics•Dec 1, 2015•6 citations

Semiclassical coherent-states propagator

Alejandro M. F. Rivas

In this work, we derived a semiclassical approximation for the matrix elements of a quantum propagator in coherent states (CS) basis that avoids complex trajectories; it only involves real ones. For that purpose, we used the symplectically invariant semiclassical Weyl propagator obtained by performing a stationary phase approximation (SPA) for the path integral in the Weyl representation. After that, for the transformation to CS representation SPA is avoided; instead a quadratic expansion of the complex exponent is used. This procedure also allows us to express the semiclassical CS propagator uniquely in terms of the classical evolution of the initial point without the need of any root search typical of van Vleck--Gutzwiller-based propagators. For the case of chaotic Hamiltonian systems, the explicit time dependence of the CS propagator has been obtained. The comparison with a realistic chaotic system that derives from a quadratic Hamiltonian, the cat map, reveals that the expression here derived is exact up to quadratic Hamiltonian systems.

arXiv:1207.0012•Physical Review A•Jul 8, 2013•2 citations

On the stationary phase evaluation of path integrals in the coherent states representation

Yitzhak Weissman

The extremal paths that arise in the stationary phase evaluation of coherent state path integrals do not seem to have a simple physical interpretation, in contrast to the extremal paths that occur in the conventional path integrals. On the other hand, a recently derived semiclassical formula for the coherent state propagator involves a path that is determined in exactly the same manner as the extremal paths of the conventional path integrals. Since both the semiclassical and the stationary phase analyses yield asymptotic (h(cross) to 0) approximations, the stationary phase and the semiclassical expressions for the propagator should be identical. The author presents a simple and direct proof that, in spite of the apparent differences, this is indeed the case. The simplification in the semiclassical formula is due to the utilisation of an appropriate set of canonical variables to describe the classical dynamics. In order to illustrate the usefulness of the semiclassical formula they present an application to the problem of the degenerate parametric amplifier, which had been treated before by operator ordering and path integral methods. The semiclassical approach has a simple classical interpretation that is absent in the alternative treatments.

Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General•Aug 21, 1983•37 citations
We construct a representation of the coherent state path integral using the Weyl symbol of the Hamiltonian operator. This representation is very different from the usual path integral forms suggested by Klauder and Skagerstam (1985 Coherent States: Applications in Physics and Mathematical Physics (Singapore: World Scientific)), which involve the normal or the antinormal ordering of the Hamiltonian. These different representations, although equivalent quantum mechanically, lead to different semiclassical limits. We show that the semiclassical limit of the coherent state propagator in the Weyl representation involves classical trajectories that are independent of the width of coherent states. This propagator is also free from the phase corrections found in Baranger et al ( 2001 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 34 7227 ) for the two Klauder forms and provides an explicit connection between the Wigner and the Husimi representations of the evolution operator.
The overcompleteness of the coherent states basis leads to a multiplicity of representations of Feynman's path integral. These different representations, although equivalent quantum mechanically, lead to different semiclassical limits. Two such semiclassical formulas were derived in \cite{Bar01} for the two corresponding path integral forms suggested by Klauder and Skagerstan in \cite{Klau85}. Each of these formulas involve trajectories governed by a different classical representation of the Hamiltonian operator: the P representation in one case and the Q representation in other. In this paper we construct a third representation of the path integral whose semiclassical limit involves directly the Weyl representation of the Hamiltonian operator, i.e., the classical Hamiltonian itself.
The overcompleteness of the coherent states basis leads to a multiplicity of representations of Feynman's path integral. These different representations, although equivalent quantum mechanically, lead to different semiclassical limits. Two such semiclassical formulas were derived in [1] for the two corresponding path integral forms suggested by Klauder and Skagerstan in [2]. Each of these formulas involve trajectories governed by a different classical representation of the Hamiltonian operator: the P representation in one case and the Q representation in other. In this paper we construct a third representation of the path integral whose semiclassical limit involves directly the Weyl representation of the Hamiltonian operator, i.e., the classical Hamiltonian itself.
We present a complete derivation of the semiclassical limit of the coherent-state propagator in one dimension, starting from path integrals in phase space. We show that the arbitrariness in the path integral representation, which follows from the overcompleteness of the coherent states, results in many different semiclassical limits. We explicitly derive two possible semiclassical formulae for the propagator, we suggest a third one, and we discuss their relationships. We also derive an initial-value representation for the semiclassical propagator, based on an initial Gaussian wavepacket. It turns out to be related to, but different from, Heller's thawed Gaussian approximation. It is very different from the Herman-Kluk formula, which is not a correct semiclassical limit. We point out errors in two derivations of the latter. Finally we show how the semiclassical coherent-state propagators lead to WKB-type quantization rules and to approximations for the Husimi distributions of stationary states.
It is shown that the semiclassical coherent state propagator takes its simplest form when the quantum mechanical Hamiltonian is replaced by its Weyl symbol in defining the classical action, in that there is then no need for a Solari-Kochetov correction. It is also shown that such a correction exists if a symbol other than the Weyl symbol is chosen and that its form is different depending on the symbol chosen. The various forms of the propagator based on different symbols are shown to be equivalent provided the correspondingly correct Solari-Kochetov correction is included. All these results are shown for both particle and spin coherent state propagators. The global anomaly in the fluctuation determinant is further elucidated by a study of the connection between the discrete fluctuation determinant and the discrete Jacobi equation.
In this work, we derived a semiclassical approximation for the matrix elements of a quantum propagator in coherent states (CS) basis that avoids complex trajectories; it only involves real ones. For that purpose, we used the symplectically invariant semiclassical Weyl propagator obtained by performing a stationary phase approximation (SPA) for the path integral in the Weyl representation. After that, for the transformation to CS representation SPA is avoided; instead a quadratic expansion of the complex exponent is used. This procedure also allows us to express the semiclassical CS propagator uniquely in terms of the classical evolution of the initial point without the need of any root search typical of van Vleck--Gutzwiller-based propagators. For the case of chaotic Hamiltonian systems, the explicit time dependence of the CS propagator has been obtained. The comparison with a realistic chaotic system that derives from a quadratic Hamiltonian, the cat map, reveals that the expression here derived is exact up to quadratic Hamiltonian systems.
The extremal paths that arise in the stationary phase evaluation of coherent state path integrals do not seem to have a simple physical interpretation, in contrast to the extremal paths that occur in the conventional path integrals. On the other hand, a recently derived semiclassical formula for the coherent state propagator involves a path that is determined in exactly the same manner as the extremal paths of the conventional path integrals. Since both the semiclassical and the stationary phase analyses yield asymptotic (h(cross) to 0) approximations, the stationary phase and the semiclassical expressions for the propagator should be identical. The author presents a simple and direct proof that, in spite of the apparent differences, this is indeed the case. The simplification in the semiclassical formula is due to the utilisation of an appropriate set of canonical variables to describe the classical dynamics. In order to illustrate the usefulness of the semiclassical formula they present an application to the problem of the degenerate parametric amplifier, which had been treated before by operator ordering and path integral methods. The semiclassical approach has a simple classical interpretation that is absent in the alternative treatments.