Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Progress of Theoretical Physics

On Proper Time and Localization for the Quantum Relativistic Electron

Andrés J. Kálnay, Enrique Mac Cotrina

Published Dec 1, 1969• 15 citations
Publisher

Abstract

A satisfactory proper time operator is found for Dirac's quantum relativistic electron. A self-consistent scheme is developed in which this operator and Beck's proper time derivative have the properties they should have. As an application of the proper time formalism as a research tool, properties of three position operators (which are generally considered as covariant) are studied in regard to their behaviour under the inhomogeneous Lorentz group and under ordinary and proper time evolution. They are Pryce's class d, Bacry's and R. J. Finkelstein's operators. It results that all three have some unreasonable properties for Dirac's electron. The reason for the difficulty in the case of Finkelstein's operator can be traced back to an incorrect definition of it. By making some changes a satisfactory position operator is obtained but it turns out to be equivalent to Bunge's one (up to an arbitrary and unimportant constant of motion). The results of this paper reinforce those of previous work which show that (for Dirac's electron) Bunge's position operator seems to be in a privileged place as regards the solution of the localization problem. Incidentaly, the interpretation of some relations previously used as auxiliary formulas for computations, allows us to obtain a manifestly covariant expression for Dirac's Hamiltonian and a second manifestly covariant form of Dirac's equation.

DOI
10.1143/ptp.42.1422

Related papers

Proper time derivatives in quantum mechanics

Juan Pablo Aparicio, Fabián H. Gaioli, Edgardo T. Garcia Alvarez

Several quantum proper time derivatives are obtained from the Beck one in the usual framework of relativistic quantum mechanics (spin-1/2 case). The ``scalar Hamiltonians'' of these derivatives should be thought of as the conjugate variables of the proper time. Then, the Hamiltonians would play the role of mass operators, suggesting the formulation of an adequate extended indefinite mass framework. We propose and briefly develop the framework corresponding to the Feynman parametrization of the Dirac equation. In such a case we derive the other parametrizations known in the literature, linking the extension of the different proposals of quantum proper time derivatives again.

arXiv:hep-th/9807212•Physical Review A•Jan 1, 1995•17 citations

Foundations for proper-time relativistic quantum theory

Tepper L. Gill, Trey Morris, S. K. Kurtz

This paper is a progress report on the foundations for the canonical proper-time approach to relativistic quantum theory. We first review the the standard square-root equation of relativistic quantum theory, followed by a review of the Dirac equation, providing new insights into the physical properties of both. We then introduce the canonical proper-time theory. For completeness, we give a brief outline of the canonical proper-time approach to electrodynamics and mechanics, and then introduce the canonical proper-time approach to relativistic quantum theory. This theory leads to three new relativistic wave equations. In each case, the canonical generator of proper-time translations is strictly positive definite, so that it represents a particle. We show that the canonical proper-time extension of the Dirac equation for Hydrogen gives results that are consistently closer to the experimental data, when compared to the Dirac equation. However, these results are not sufficient to account for either the Lamb shift or the anomalous magnetic moment.

arXiv:1503.02579•Journal of Physics Conference Series•May 14, 2015•1 citation

Covariant Position Operators, Spin, and Locality

Gordon N. Fleming

A manifestly covariant formalism is developed suitable for a discussion of position operators for relativistic systems. It is shown that the rest-frame center of mass and the frame-dependent center of mass, which were studied previously by Pryce and M\o{}ller, and the local Newton-Wigner operator all transform like the spatial part of a four-vector when appropriately interpreted. The formalism allows an equivalent treatment of the space and time components of a position four-vector operator, and manifestly covariant canonical commutation rules are obtained for the three operators mentioned above. Finally it is suggested that the Newton-Wigner operator be interpreted as a center of spin.

Physical Review•Jan 11, 1965•201 citations

Localization problem in quantum mechanics and preferred frame

Paweł Caban, Jakub Rembieliński

In this paper the localization problem in the relativistic quantum mechanics is considered in the framework of a nonstandard synchronization scheme for clocks. Such a synchronization preserves Poincaré covariance but (at least formally) distinguishes an inertial frame. Our analysis has been focused mainly on the problem of existence of a proper position operator for massive particles. We have found the explicit form of the position operator and have demonstrated that in the preferred frame our operator coincides with the Newton–Wigner one. Moreover, full algebra of observables consisting of position operators and fourmomentum operators is manifestly Poincaré covariant in this framework. Our results support expectations of other authors (Bell [1], Eberhard [3]) that a consistent formulation of quantum mechanics demands existence of a preferred frame.

AIP conference proceedings•Jan 1, 1998•1 citation

Position Operators and Proper Time in Relativistic Quantum Mechanics

Joseph E. Johnson

Covariant four-vector position operators ${X}^{\ensuremath{\mu}}$ are proposed, which form a natural operator generalization of the four-position in relativistic classical mechanics. These ${X}^{\ensuremath{\mu}}$ are defined by specifying commutation relations of the ${X}^{\ensuremath{\mu}}$ with the Poincar\'e generators ${P}^{\ensuremath{\mu}}$ and ${M}^{\ensuremath{\mu}\ensuremath{\nu}}$, and thereby extending the Poincar\'e algebra to a larger algebra whose representations are subsequently found. The ${X}^{\ensuremath{\mu}}$ are shown to be acceptable relativistic position operators within a proper-time dynamical framework. A single Hamiltonian is used for all spins, with a covariant proper-time description. The dynamics is capable of describing the time evolution of states which are not mass eigenstates. An automatic Foldy-Wouthuysen-type diagonalization is achieved for all spin representations, with spin and orbital angular momentum being separately conserved. The connection with the standard theory is made via the specific field equations. In making this connection to the standard theory of half-integral spins, the origin of Zitterbewegung and the nonseparate conservation of spin and angular momentum are clarified. The connection to Maxwell's equations provides an interesting statement of those equations and of gauge invariance. The unphysical representations of negative and imaginary mass and continuous spin are not present in this formalism. Other features are discussed.

Physical Review•May 25, 1969•69 citations

Aspects of particle localisation in quantum mechanics

G.F. Melloy

The concept of position is a basic one in our construction of a model of thenphysical world: yet the theory of localisation in quantum mechanics is fraughtnwith difficulties, especially in the relativistic case. A strictly localised state forna nonrelativistic particle cannot be described by an ordinary function. In thenrelativistic case the problems are manifold. For a free electron, using the Diracnposition operator x, we cannot construct positive-energy states which localisenthe particle within a compact region. Furthermore it has been suggested that anconsistent one-particle description of localisation on a scale small compared tonthe Compton wavelength of the particle is ruled out because pair-productionnwould take place. These matters are dicussed at greater length in Chaptern1, where several proposed localisation schemes (that is, sets of definitions ofnlocalised states and position operators) are reviewed: none of these is deemednwholly satisfactory. Introductory remarks are also made in this chapter aboutnthe remarkable phenomenon of 'probability backflow', which is discussed further below, and which is relevant to our discussion of localisation.In Chapter 2 we show that while strict localisation of the free Dirac particle is not describable within the usual mathematical formalism, in terms of Dirac's position operator x it is possible to describe sequences of positive-energy states whose spread Dx = ((x -- x0)2) about a point X0 approaches zero.In Chapter 3 the component states of these sequences are used as the basis of a full causally well-behaved solution to the localisation problem for the free electron, with natural space-time transformation properties. It is shown that although x is not an observable in the usual sense, the four-vector density (p(x, t), j(x, t)/c) is observable, and can be localised arbitrarily precisely about any point in space, at any instant of time, using only positive-energy states. A suitable spin operator can be diagonalised at the same time.n n

•Jan 1, 2001•0 citations
A satisfactory proper time operator is found for Dirac's quantum relativistic electron. A self-consistent scheme is developed in which this operator and Beck's proper time derivative have the properties they should have. As an application of the proper time formalism as a research tool, properties of three position operators (which are generally considered as covariant) are studied in regard to their behaviour under the inhomogeneous Lorentz group and under ordinary and proper time evolution. They are Pryce's class d, Bacry's and R. J. Finkelstein's operators. It results that all three have some unreasonable properties for Dirac's electron. The reason for the difficulty in the case of Finkelstein's operator can be traced back to an incorrect definition of it. By making some changes a satisfactory position operator is obtained but it turns out to be equivalent to Bunge's one (up to an arbitrary and unimportant constant of motion). The results of this paper reinforce those of previous work which show that (for Dirac's electron) Bunge's position operator seems to be in a privileged place as regards the solution of the localization problem. Incidentaly, the interpretation of some relations previously used as auxiliary formulas for computations, allows us to obtain a manifestly covariant expression for Dirac's Hamiltonian and a second manifestly covariant form of Dirac's equation.
Several quantum proper time derivatives are obtained from the Beck one in the usual framework of relativistic quantum mechanics (spin-1/2 case). The ``scalar Hamiltonians'' of these derivatives should be thought of as the conjugate variables of the proper time. Then, the Hamiltonians would play the role of mass operators, suggesting the formulation of an adequate extended indefinite mass framework. We propose and briefly develop the framework corresponding to the Feynman parametrization of the Dirac equation. In such a case we derive the other parametrizations known in the literature, linking the extension of the different proposals of quantum proper time derivatives again.
This paper is a progress report on the foundations for the canonical proper-time approach to relativistic quantum theory. We first review the the standard square-root equation of relativistic quantum theory, followed by a review of the Dirac equation, providing new insights into the physical properties of both. We then introduce the canonical proper-time theory. For completeness, we give a brief outline of the canonical proper-time approach to electrodynamics and mechanics, and then introduce the canonical proper-time approach to relativistic quantum theory. This theory leads to three new relativistic wave equations. In each case, the canonical generator of proper-time translations is strictly positive definite, so that it represents a particle. We show that the canonical proper-time extension of the Dirac equation for Hydrogen gives results that are consistently closer to the experimental data, when compared to the Dirac equation. However, these results are not sufficient to account for either the Lamb shift or the anomalous magnetic moment.
A manifestly covariant formalism is developed suitable for a discussion of position operators for relativistic systems. It is shown that the rest-frame center of mass and the frame-dependent center of mass, which were studied previously by Pryce and M\o{}ller, and the local Newton-Wigner operator all transform like the spatial part of a four-vector when appropriately interpreted. The formalism allows an equivalent treatment of the space and time components of a position four-vector operator, and manifestly covariant canonical commutation rules are obtained for the three operators mentioned above. Finally it is suggested that the Newton-Wigner operator be interpreted as a center of spin.
In this paper the localization problem in the relativistic quantum mechanics is considered in the framework of a nonstandard synchronization scheme for clocks. Such a synchronization preserves Poincaré covariance but (at least formally) distinguishes an inertial frame. Our analysis has been focused mainly on the problem of existence of a proper position operator for massive particles. We have found the explicit form of the position operator and have demonstrated that in the preferred frame our operator coincides with the Newton–Wigner one. Moreover, full algebra of observables consisting of position operators and fourmomentum operators is manifestly Poincaré covariant in this framework. Our results support expectations of other authors (Bell [1], Eberhard [3]) that a consistent formulation of quantum mechanics demands existence of a preferred frame.
Covariant four-vector position operators ${X}^{\ensuremath{\mu}}$ are proposed, which form a natural operator generalization of the four-position in relativistic classical mechanics. These ${X}^{\ensuremath{\mu}}$ are defined by specifying commutation relations of the ${X}^{\ensuremath{\mu}}$ with the Poincar\'e generators ${P}^{\ensuremath{\mu}}$ and ${M}^{\ensuremath{\mu}\ensuremath{\nu}}$, and thereby extending the Poincar\'e algebra to a larger algebra whose representations are subsequently found. The ${X}^{\ensuremath{\mu}}$ are shown to be acceptable relativistic position operators within a proper-time dynamical framework. A single Hamiltonian is used for all spins, with a covariant proper-time description. The dynamics is capable of describing the time evolution of states which are not mass eigenstates. An automatic Foldy-Wouthuysen-type diagonalization is achieved for all spin representations, with spin and orbital angular momentum being separately conserved. The connection with the standard theory is made via the specific field equations. In making this connection to the standard theory of half-integral spins, the origin of Zitterbewegung and the nonseparate conservation of spin and angular momentum are clarified. The connection to Maxwell's equations provides an interesting statement of those equations and of gauge invariance. The unphysical representations of negative and imaginary mass and continuous spin are not present in this formalism. Other features are discussed.
The concept of position is a basic one in our construction of a model of thenphysical world: yet the theory of localisation in quantum mechanics is fraughtnwith difficulties, especially in the relativistic case. A strictly localised state forna nonrelativistic particle cannot be described by an ordinary function. In thenrelativistic case the problems are manifold. For a free electron, using the Diracnposition operator x, we cannot construct positive-energy states which localisenthe particle within a compact region. Furthermore it has been suggested that anconsistent one-particle description of localisation on a scale small compared tonthe Compton wavelength of the particle is ruled out because pair-productionnwould take place. These matters are dicussed at greater length in Chaptern1, where several proposed localisation schemes (that is, sets of definitions ofnlocalised states and position operators) are reviewed: none of these is deemednwholly satisfactory. Introductory remarks are also made in this chapter aboutnthe remarkable phenomenon of 'probability backflow', which is discussed further below, and which is relevant to our discussion of localisation.In Chapter 2 we show that while strict localisation of the free Dirac particle is not describable within the usual mathematical formalism, in terms of Dirac's position operator x it is possible to describe sequences of positive-energy states whose spread Dx = ((x -- x0)2) about a point X0 approaches zero.In Chapter 3 the component states of these sequences are used as the basis of a full causally well-behaved solution to the localisation problem for the free electron, with natural space-time transformation properties. It is shown that although x is not an observable in the usual sense, the four-vector density (p(x, t), j(x, t)/c) is observable, and can be localised arbitrarily precisely about any point in space, at any instant of time, using only positive-energy states. A suitable spin operator can be diagonalised at the same time.n n