Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Science China Physics Mechanics and Astronomy

An upper bound for the generalized adiabatic approximation error with a superposition initial state

Wenhua Wang, HuaiXin Cao, Ling Lu, Baomin Yu

Published Oct 22, 2014• 5 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/s11433-014-5604-0

Related papers

Computable upper bounds for the adiabatic approximation errors

Baomin Yu, HuaiXin Cao, Zhihua Guo +1 more

Science China Physics Mechanics and Astronomy•Aug 4, 2014•11 citations

An upper bound for the adiabatic approximation error

Wang Yong Wen

In this paper,we derive an upper bound for the adiabatic approximation error,which is the distance between the exact solution to a Schr dinger equation and the adiabatic approximation solution. As an application,we obtain an upper bound for 1 minus the fidelity of the exact solution and the adiabatic approximation solution to a Schrdinger equation.

Science in China. Series G, Physics, mechanics & astronomy/Science in China. Series G, Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy•Jan 1, 2014•0 citations

Variationallowerbound on the scattering length

Leonard Rosenberg, Larry Spruch

The scattering length $A$ characterizes the zero-energy scattering of one system by another. It was shown some time ago that a variational upper bound on $A$ could be obtained using methods, of the Rayleigh-Ritz type, which are commonly employed to obtain upper bounds on energy eigenvalues. Here we formulate a method for obtaining a variational lower bound on $A$. Once again the essential idea is to express the scattering length as a variational estimate plus an error term and then to reduce the problem of bounding the error term to one involving bounds on energy eigenvalues. In particular, the variational lower bound on $A$ is rigorously established provided a certain modified Hamiltonian can be shown to have no discrete states lying below the level of the continuum threshold. It is unfortunately true that necessary conditions for the existence of bound states are not available for multiparticle systems in general. However, in the case of positron-atom scattering the adiabatic approximation can be introduced as an (essentially) solvable comparison problem to rigorously establish the nonexistence of bound states of the modified Hamiltonian. It has recently been shown how the validity of the variational upper bound on $A$ can be maintained when the target ground-state wave function is imprecisely known. Similar methods can be used to maintain the variational lower bound on $A$. Since the bound is variational, the error in the calculated scattering length will be of second order in the error in the wave function. The use of the adiabatic approximation in the present context places no limitation in principle on the accuracy achievable.

Physical Review A•Oct 1, 1975•10 citations

Quantitative sufficient conditions for adiabatic approximation

HuaiXin Cao, Zhihua Guo, ZhengLi Chen +1 more

Science China Physics Mechanics and Astronomy•May 23, 2013•24 citations

Adiabatic theorem in the presence of noise

Michael J. O’Hara, Dianne Prost O’Leary

We provide rigorous bounds for the error of the adiabatic approximation of quantum mechanics under four sources of experimental error: perturbations in the initial condition, systematic time-dependent perturbations in the Hamiltonian, coupling to low-energy quantum systems, and decoherent time-dependent perturbations in the Hamiltonian. For decoherent perturbations, we find both upper and lower bounds on the evolution time to guarantee that the adiabatic approximation performs within a prescribed tolerance. Our results include explicit definitions of constants, and we apply them to the spin-1/2 particle in a rotating magnetic field and to the superconducting flux qubit. We compare the theoretical bounds on the superconducting flux qubit to simulation results.

arXiv:0801.3872•Physical Review A•Apr 22, 2008•16 citations

Adiabatic Approximation for Quasi-Stationary States

G. F. Drukarev

•Jan 1, 1965•0 citations
The scattering length AAA characterizes the zero-energy scattering of one system by another. It was shown some time ago that a variational upper bound on AAA could be obtained using methods, of the Rayleigh-Ritz type, which are commonly employed to obtain upper bounds on energy eigenvalues. Here we formulate a method for obtaining a variational lower bound on AAA. Once again the essential idea is to express the scattering length as a variational estimate plus an error term and then to reduce the problem of bounding the error term to one involving bounds on energy eigenvalues. In particular, the variational lower bound on AAA is rigorously established provided a certain modified Hamiltonian can be shown to have no discrete states lying below the level of the continuum threshold. It is unfortunately true that necessary conditions for the existence of bound states are not available for multiparticle systems in general. However, in the case of positron-atom scattering the adiabatic approximation can be introduced as an (essentially) solvable comparison problem to rigorously establish the nonexistence of bound states of the modified Hamiltonian. It has recently been shown how the validity of the variational upper bound on AAA can be maintained when the target ground-state wave function is imprecisely known. Similar methods can be used to maintain the variational lower bound on AAA. Since the bound is variational, the error in the calculated scattering length will be of second order in the error in the wave function. The use of the adiabatic approximation in the present context places no limitation in principle on the accuracy achievable.
We provide rigorous bounds for the error of the adiabatic approximation of quantum mechanics under four sources of experimental error: perturbations in the initial condition, systematic time-dependent perturbations in the Hamiltonian, coupling to low-energy quantum systems, and decoherent time-dependent perturbations in the Hamiltonian. For decoherent perturbations, we find both upper and lower bounds on the evolution time to guarantee that the adiabatic approximation performs within a prescribed tolerance. Our results include explicit definitions of constants, and we apply them to the spin-1/2 particle in a rotating magnetic field and to the superconducting flux qubit. We compare the theoretical bounds on the superconducting flux qubit to simulation results.