Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Science China Physics Mechanics and Astronomy

Computable upper bounds for the adiabatic approximation errors

Baomin Yu, HuaiXin Cao, Zhihua Guo, Wenhua Wang

Published Aug 4, 2014• 11 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/s11433-014-5504-3

Related papers

An upper bound for the generalized adiabatic approximation error with a superposition initial state

Wenhua Wang, HuaiXin Cao, Ling Lu +1 more

Science China Physics Mechanics and Astronomy•Oct 22, 2014•5 citations

An upper bound for the adiabatic approximation error

Wang Yong Wen

In this paper,we derive an upper bound for the adiabatic approximation error,which is the distance between the exact solution to a Schr dinger equation and the adiabatic approximation solution. As an application,we obtain an upper bound for 1 minus the fidelity of the exact solution and the adiabatic approximation solution to a Schrdinger equation.

Science in China. Series G, Physics, mechanics & astronomy/Science in China. Series G, Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy•Jan 1, 2014•0 citations

Error-run-time trade-off in the adiabatic approximation beyond scaling relations

M.R. Passos, M.M. Taddei, R.L. de Matos Filho

arXiv:1907.03769•Annals of Physics•Apr 17, 2020•3 citations

Improved error bounds for the adiabatic approximation

Donny Cheung, Peter Høyer, Nathan Wiebe

The discovery of adiabatic quantum computing has revealed a need for rigorously proven bounds for the error in the adiabatic approximation. We present in this paper, a rigorous and elementary derivation of upper and lower bounds on the error incurred from using the adiabatic approximation for quantum systems that can be used to assess the runtime of adiabatic algorithms. Our bounds are often asymptotically tight in the limit of slow evolution for fixed Hamiltonians, and are used to provide sufficient conditions for the application of the adiabatic approximation. We show that our sufficiency criteria exclude the Marzlin–Sanders counterexample from the class of Hamiltonians that obey the adiabatic approximation. Finally, we demonstrate the existence of classes of Hamiltonians that resemble the Marzlin–Sanders counterexample Hamiltonian, but also obey the adiabatic approximation.

arXiv:1103.4174•Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical•Sep 20, 2011•36 citations

Quantitative sufficient conditions for adiabatic approximation

HuaiXin Cao, Zhihua Guo, ZhengLi Chen +1 more

Science China Physics Mechanics and Astronomy•May 23, 2013•24 citations

Error correction for adiabatic quantum computing

Kevin C Young

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 5, 2014•0 citations
The discovery of adiabatic quantum computing has revealed a need for rigorously proven bounds for the error in the adiabatic approximation. We present in this paper, a rigorous and elementary derivation of upper and lower bounds on the error incurred from using the adiabatic approximation for quantum systems that can be used to assess the runtime of adiabatic algorithms. Our bounds are often asymptotically tight in the limit of slow evolution for fixed Hamiltonians, and are used to provide sufficient conditions for the application of the adiabatic approximation. We show that our sufficiency criteria exclude the Marzlin–Sanders counterexample from the class of Hamiltonians that obey the adiabatic approximation. Finally, we demonstrate the existence of classes of Hamiltonians that resemble the Marzlin–Sanders counterexample Hamiltonian, but also obey the adiabatic approximation.