Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

International Journal of Quantum Information

Improvement on "an efficient protocol for the quantum private comparison of equality with W state"

Wenjie Liu, Chao Liu, Hanwu Chen, Zhihao Liu, Min-Xiao Yuan, Jin-Shen Lu

Published Jan 21, 2014• 11 citations
Publisher

Abstract

A quantum private comparison (QPC) protocol based on W states [W. Liu et al., Opt. Commun.284, 3160 (2011)] has pointed out there is a flaw of information leak [Y. B. Li et al., Eur. Phys. J. D.66, 110 (2012)]. In order to solve the problem, a special kind of W-class state is introduced, and its construction framework of quantum circuits is sketched. Based on this kind of W-class states, an improvement on Liu et al.'s protocol is presented. Analysis shows the improvement can not only hold the characteristics of original protocol, but also avoid the information leak that Li et al. pointed out.

DOI
10.1142/s0219749914500014

Related papers

Multi-Party Quantum Private Comparison Protocol Based on Entanglement Swapping of Bell Entangled States*

Tian-Yu Ye

Abstract Recently, Liu et al. proposed a two-party quantum private comparison (QPC) protocol using entanglement swapping of Bell entangled state (Commun. Theor. Phys. 57 (2012) 583). Subsequently Liu et al. pointed out that in Liu et al.'s protocol, the TP can extract the two users' secret inputs without being detected by launching the Bell-basis measurement attack, and suggested the corresponding improvement to mend this loophole (Commun. Theor. Phys. 62 (2014) 210). In this paper, we first point out the information leakage problem toward TP existing in both of the above two protocols, and then suggest the corresponding improvement by using the one-way hash function to encrypt the two users' secret inputs. We further put forward the three-party QPC protocol also based on entanglement swapping of Bell entangled state, and then validate its output correctness and its security in detail. Finally, we generalize the three-party QPC protocol into the multi-party case, which can accomplish arbitrary pair's comparison of equality among K users within one execution.

arXiv:2205.04008•Communications in Theoretical Physics•Sep 1, 2016•27 citations

Efficient Quantum Private Comparison without Sharing a Key

Jian Li, Fanting Che, Zhuo Wang +1 more

Quantum private comparison (QPC) allows at least two users to compare the equality of their secret information, for which the security is based on the properties of quantum mechanics. To improve the use of quantum resources and the efficiency of private comparison, a new QPC protocol based on GHZ-like states is proposed. The protocol adopts unitary operations to encode the secret information instead of performing quantum key distribution (QKD), which can reduce the amount of computation required to perform QKD and improve the utilization of quantum resources. The decoy photon technique used to detect channel eavesdropping ensures that the protocol is resistant to external attacks. The quantum efficiency of the protocol reaches 66%. Compared with many previous QPC schemes, the proposed protocol does not need to share a key and has advantages in quantum efficiency and quantum resources.

Entropy•Nov 17, 2023•10 citations

Cryptanalysis and improvement of Wu–Cai–Wu–Zhang’s quantum private comparison protocol

Guang Ping He

In a recent paper [Int. J. Quantum Inf. 17 (2019) 1950026], the authors discussed the shortcomings in the security of a quantum private comparison protocol that we previously proposed [Int. J. Quantum Inf. 15 (2017) 1750014]. They also proposed a new protocol aimed to avoid these problems. Here, we analyze the information leaked in their protocol, and find that it is even less secure than our protocol in certain cases. We further propose an improved version which has the following advantages: (1) no entanglement needed, (2) quantum memory is no longer required, and (3) less information leaked. Therefore, better security and great feasibility are both achieved.

arXiv:1908.09169•International Journal of Quantum Information•Oct 1, 2020•0 citations

Quantum Private Comparison of Equal Information Based on Highly Entangled Six-Qubit Genuine State

纪兆旭, 叶天语

Using the highly entangled six-qubit genuine state we present a quantum private comparison(QPC)protocol, which enables two users to compare the equality of two bits of their secrets in every round comparison with the assistance of a semi-honest third party(TP). The proposed protocol needs neither unitary operations nor quantum entanglement swapping technology, both of which may consume expensive quantum devices. Single particle measurements and Bell-basis measurements, which are easy to implement with current technologies, are employed by two users and TP in the proposed protocol, respectively. The proposed protocol can withstand all kinds of outside attacks and participant attacks. Moreover, none of information about the two users’ private secrets and the comparison result is leaked out to TP.

理论物理通讯：英文版•Jan 1, 2016•0 citations

Quantum Private Comparison of Equal Information Based on Highly Entangled Six-Qubit Genuine State*

Zhaoxu Ji, Tian-Yu Ye

Abstract Using the highly entangled six-qubit genuine state we present a quantum private comparison (QPC) protocol, which enables two users to compare the equality of two bits of their secrets in every round comparison with the assistance of a semi-honest third party (TP). The proposed protocol needs neither unitary operations nor quantum entanglement swapping technology, both of which may consume expensive quantum devices. Single particle measurements and Bell-basis measurements, which are easy to implement with current technologies, are employed by two users and TP in the proposed protocol, respectively. The proposed protocol can withstand all kinds of outside attacks and participant attacks. Moreover, none of information about the two users' private secrets and the comparison result is leaked out to TP.

Communications in Theoretical Physics•Jun 1, 2016•66 citations

Cryptanalysis and Improvement of Quantum Private Comparison Protocol Based on Bell Entangled States

Wenjie Liu, Chao Liu, Hanwu Chen +2 more

Recently, Liu et al. [ Commun. Theor. Phys. 57 (2012) 583 ] proposed a quantum private comparison protocol based on entanglement swapping of Bell states, which aims to securely compare the equality of two participants' information with the help of a semi-honest third party (TP). However, the present study points out there is a fatal loophole in Liu et al.'s protocol, and TP can make Bell-basis measurement to know all the participants' secret inputs without being detected. To fix the problem, a simple solution, which uses one-time eavesdropper checking with decoy photons instead of twice eavesdropper checking with Bell states, is demonstrated. Compared with the original protocol, it not only reduces the Bell states consumption but also simplifies the protocol steps.

arXiv:1405.6455•Communications in Theoretical Physics•Aug 1, 2014•29 citations
A quantum private comparison (QPC) protocol based on W states [W. Liu et al., Opt. Commun.284, 3160 (2011)] has pointed out there is a flaw of information leak [Y. B. Li et al., Eur. Phys. J. D.66, 110 (2012)]. In order to solve the problem, a special kind of W-class state is introduced, and its construction framework of quantum circuits is sketched. Based on this kind of W-class states, an improvement on Liu et al.'s protocol is presented. Analysis shows the improvement can not only hold the characteristics of original protocol, but also avoid the information leak that Li et al. pointed out.
Abstract Recently, Liu et al. proposed a two-party quantum private comparison (QPC) protocol using entanglement swapping of Bell entangled state (Commun. Theor. Phys. 57 (2012) 583). Subsequently Liu et al. pointed out that in Liu et al.'s protocol, the TP can extract the two users' secret inputs without being detected by launching the Bell-basis measurement attack, and suggested the corresponding improvement to mend this loophole (Commun. Theor. Phys. 62 (2014) 210). In this paper, we first point out the information leakage problem toward TP existing in both of the above two protocols, and then suggest the corresponding improvement by using the one-way hash function to encrypt the two users' secret inputs. We further put forward the three-party QPC protocol also based on entanglement swapping of Bell entangled state, and then validate its output correctness and its security in detail. Finally, we generalize the three-party QPC protocol into the multi-party case, which can accomplish arbitrary pair's comparison of equality among K users within one execution.
Quantum private comparison (QPC) allows at least two users to compare the equality of their secret information, for which the security is based on the properties of quantum mechanics. To improve the use of quantum resources and the efficiency of private comparison, a new QPC protocol based on GHZ-like states is proposed. The protocol adopts unitary operations to encode the secret information instead of performing quantum key distribution (QKD), which can reduce the amount of computation required to perform QKD and improve the utilization of quantum resources. The decoy photon technique used to detect channel eavesdropping ensures that the protocol is resistant to external attacks. The quantum efficiency of the protocol reaches 66%. Compared with many previous QPC schemes, the proposed protocol does not need to share a key and has advantages in quantum efficiency and quantum resources.
In a recent paper [Int. J. Quantum Inf. 17 (2019) 1950026], the authors discussed the shortcomings in the security of a quantum private comparison protocol that we previously proposed [Int. J. Quantum Inf. 15 (2017) 1750014]. They also proposed a new protocol aimed to avoid these problems. Here, we analyze the information leaked in their protocol, and find that it is even less secure than our protocol in certain cases. We further propose an improved version which has the following advantages: (1) no entanglement needed, (2) quantum memory is no longer required, and (3) less information leaked. Therefore, better security and great feasibility are both achieved.
Using the highly entangled six-qubit genuine state we present a quantum private comparison(QPC)protocol, which enables two users to compare the equality of two bits of their secrets in every round comparison with the assistance of a semi-honest third party(TP). The proposed protocol needs neither unitary operations nor quantum entanglement swapping technology, both of which may consume expensive quantum devices. Single particle measurements and Bell-basis measurements, which are easy to implement with current technologies, are employed by two users and TP in the proposed protocol, respectively. The proposed protocol can withstand all kinds of outside attacks and participant attacks. Moreover, none of information about the two users’ private secrets and the comparison result is leaked out to TP.
Abstract Using the highly entangled six-qubit genuine state we present a quantum private comparison (QPC) protocol, which enables two users to compare the equality of two bits of their secrets in every round comparison with the assistance of a semi-honest third party (TP). The proposed protocol needs neither unitary operations nor quantum entanglement swapping technology, both of which may consume expensive quantum devices. Single particle measurements and Bell-basis measurements, which are easy to implement with current technologies, are employed by two users and TP in the proposed protocol, respectively. The proposed protocol can withstand all kinds of outside attacks and participant attacks. Moreover, none of information about the two users' private secrets and the comparison result is leaked out to TP.
Recently, Liu et al. [ Commun. Theor. Phys. 57 (2012) 583 ] proposed a quantum private comparison protocol based on entanglement swapping of Bell states, which aims to securely compare the equality of two participants' information with the help of a semi-honest third party (TP). However, the present study points out there is a fatal loophole in Liu et al.'s protocol, and TP can make Bell-basis measurement to know all the participants' secret inputs without being detected. To fix the problem, a simple solution, which uses one-time eavesdropper checking with decoy photons instead of twice eavesdropper checking with Bell states, is demonstrated. Compared with the original protocol, it not only reduces the Bell states consumption but also simplifies the protocol steps.