Oblivious transfer protocol is an important primitive in modern cryptography. Since its introduction, the subject has attracted a lot of attentions and has become the basis for realizing a broad class of cryptographic protocols, such as secret key exchange, contract signing, secure function evaluation, oblivious keyword search, etc. This work describes protocols for proxy oblivious transfer, in which the role of the sender is divided between two proxies, and a receiver (chooser) must contact one proxy in order to run the oblivious transfer protocol and another for some extra information. This proxy oblivious transfer protocol provides a method for the sender to delegate a proxy to transfer one of his messages to a receiver on behalf of him. The proxy oblivious transfer protocol has the same security properties as the oblivious transfer protocol using in our protocol.
Oblivious transfer protocol is an important primitive in modern cryptography. Since its introduction, the subject has attracted a lot of attentions and has become the basis for realizing a broad class of cryptographic protocols, such as secret key exchange, contract signing, secure function evaluation, oblivious keyword search, etc. This work describes protocols for proxy oblivious transfer, in which the role of the sender is divided between two proxies, and a receiver (chooser) must contact one proxy in order to run the oblivious transfer protocol and another for some extra information. This proxy oblivious transfer protocol provides a method for the sender to delegate a proxy to transfer one of his messages to a receiver on behalf of him. The proxy oblivious transfer protocol has the same security properties as the oblivious transfer protocol using in our protocol.
Oblivious transfer (OT) protocol is an essential tool in cryptography that provides a wide range of applications such as secure multi-party computation, private information retrieval, private set intersection, contract signing, and privacy-preserving location-based services. The OT protocol has different variants such as one-out-of-2, one-out-of- n , k -out-of- n , and OT extension. In the OT (one-out-of-2, one-out-of- n , and OT extension) protocol, the sender has a set of messages, whereas the receiver has a key. The receiver sends that key to the sender in a secure way; the sender cannot get any information about the received key. The sender encrypts every message by operating on every message using the received key and sends all the encrypted messages to the receiver. The receiver is able to extract only the required message using his key. However, in the k -out-of- n OT protocol, the receiver sends a set of k keys to the sender, and in replay, the sender sends all the encrypted messages. The receiver uses his keys and extracts the required messages, but it cannot gain any information about the messages that it has not requested. Generally, the OT protocol requires high communication and computation cost if we transfer millions of oblivious messages. The OT extension protocol provides a solution for this, where the receiver transfers a set of keys to the sender by executing a few numbers of OT protocols. Then, the sender encrypts all the messages using cheap symmetric key cryptography with the help of a received set of keys and transfers millions of oblivious messages to the receiver. In this work, we present different variants of OT protocols such as one-out-of-2, one-out-of- n , k -out-of- n , and OT extension. Furthermore, we cover various aspects of theoretical security guarantees such as semi-honest and malicious adversaries, universally composable, used techniques, computation, and communication efficiency aspects. From the analysis, we found that the semi-honest adversary-based OT protocols required low communication and computation costs as compared to malicious adversary-based OT protocols.
Oblivious transfer protocol,which is an important and useful cryptographic protocol,has been widely applied in cryptographic field,especially in construction of secure multi-party computation protocol.However,all of present oblivious transfer protocols have two drawbacks for requirement of their secrets: ① the receiver does not know whether message received is one of the messages held by the sender;② the sender does not know whether message received by the receiver is one of the messages designated by himself.In order to conquer these drawbacks,we firstly introduce the notion of verifiable oblivious transfer protocol,and firstly construct it by using proof protocol of knowledge,i.e.,∑-protocol,as main tool.
1 IntroductionOblivious Transfer (OT) protocols allow one party, the sender, to transmit part of its inputs to another party, the chooser, in a manner that protects both of them: the sender is assured that the chooser does not receive more information than it is entitled, while the chooser is assured that the sender does not learn which part of the inputs it received. OT is used as a key component in many applications of cryptography. Its computational requirements are quite demanding and they are likely to be the bottleneck in many applications that invoke it.1.1 Contributions.This paper presents several significant improvements to oblivious transfer (OT) protocols of strings, and in particular: (i) Improving the efficiency of applications which many invocations of oblivious transfer. (ii) Providing the first two-round OT protocol whose security analysis does not invoke the random oracle model.
We propose a quantum protocol for 1-out-of-2, 1-out-of-n and k-out-of-n oblivious transfer. Oblivious transfer is a counter-intuitive cryptographic primitive in which the receiver receives only the information he is authorized for, while the sender does not know what information receiver received. In 1-out-of-2 oblivious transfer, Alice sends two bits to Bob who can choose only one of them to read, while Alice does not know which bit Bob read. k-out-of-n oblivious transfer is an extension of this idea. The proposed protocols do not require any classical communication, are practical, secure and can be implemented using current technology.
Oblivious transfer, a central functionality in modern cryptography, allows a party to send two one-bit messages to another who can choose one of them to read, remaining ignorant about the other, whereas the sender does not learn the receiver's choice. Oblivious transfer the security of which is information-theoretic for both parties is known impossible to achieve from scratch. The joint behavior of certain bi-partite quantum states is non-local, i.e., cannot be explained by shared classical information. In order to better understand such behavior, which is classically explainable only by communication, but does not allow for it, Popescu and Rohrlich have described a "non-locality machine": Two parties both input a bit, and both get a random output bit the XOR of which is the AND of the input bits. We show a close connection, in a cryptographic sense, between OT and the "PR primitive." More specifically, unconditional OT can be achieved from a single realization of PR, and vice versa. Our reductions, which are single-copy, information-theoretic, and perfect, also lead to a simple and optimal protocol allowing for inverting the direction of OT
Randomized protocols for signing contracts, certified mail, and flipping a coin are presented. The protocols use a 1-out-of-2 oblivious transfer subprotocol which is axiomatically defined. The 1-out-of-2 oblivious transfer allows one party to transfer exactly one secret, out of two recognizable secrets, to his counterpart. The first (second) secret is received with probability one half, while the sender is ignorant of which secret has been received. An implementation of the 1-out-of-2 oblivious transfer, using any public key cryptosystem, is presented.