1 IntroductionOblivious Transfer (OT) protocols allow one party, the sender, to transmit part of its inputs to another party, the chooser, in a manner that protects both of them: the sender is assured that the chooser does not receive more information than it is entitled, while the chooser is assured that the sender does not learn which part of the inputs it received. OT is used as a key component in many applications of cryptography. Its computational requirements are quite demanding and they are likely to be the bottleneck in many applications that invoke it.1.1 Contributions.This paper presents several significant improvements to oblivious transfer (OT) protocols of strings, and in particular: (i) Improving the efficiency of applications which many invocations of oblivious transfer. (ii) Providing the first two-round OT protocol whose security analysis does not invoke the random oracle model.
1 IntroductionOblivious Transfer (OT) protocols allow one party, the sender, to transmit part of its inputs to another party, the chooser, in a manner that protects both of them: the sender is assured that the chooser does not receive more information than it is entitled, while the chooser is assured that the sender does not learn which part of the inputs it received. OT is used as a key component in many applications of cryptography. Its computational requirements are quite demanding and they are likely to be the bottleneck in many applications that invoke it.1.1 Contributions.This paper presents several significant improvements to oblivious transfer (OT) protocols of strings, and in particular: (i) Improving the efficiency of applications which many invocations of oblivious transfer. (ii) Providing the first two-round OT protocol whose security analysis does not invoke the random oracle model.
Oblivious transfer (OT) protocol is an essential tool in cryptography that provides a wide range of applications such as secure multi-party computation, private information retrieval, private set intersection, contract signing, and privacy-preserving location-based services. The OT protocol has different variants such as one-out-of-2, one-out-of- n , k -out-of- n , and OT extension. In the OT (one-out-of-2, one-out-of- n , and OT extension) protocol, the sender has a set of messages, whereas the receiver has a key. The receiver sends that key to the sender in a secure way; the sender cannot get any information about the received key. The sender encrypts every message by operating on every message using the received key and sends all the encrypted messages to the receiver. The receiver is able to extract only the required message using his key. However, in the k -out-of- n OT protocol, the receiver sends a set of k keys to the sender, and in replay, the sender sends all the encrypted messages. The receiver uses his keys and extracts the required messages, but it cannot gain any information about the messages that it has not requested. Generally, the OT protocol requires high communication and computation cost if we transfer millions of oblivious messages. The OT extension protocol provides a solution for this, where the receiver transfers a set of keys to the sender by executing a few numbers of OT protocols. Then, the sender encrypts all the messages using cheap symmetric key cryptography with the help of a received set of keys and transfers millions of oblivious messages to the receiver. In this work, we present different variants of OT protocols such as one-out-of-2, one-out-of- n , k -out-of- n , and OT extension. Furthermore, we cover various aspects of theoretical security guarantees such as semi-honest and malicious adversaries, universally composable, used techniques, computation, and communication efficiency aspects. From the analysis, we found that the semi-honest adversary-based OT protocols required low communication and computation costs as compared to malicious adversary-based OT protocols.
The Oblivious Transfer (OT), introduced by Rabin in 1981, has become an important and fundamental cryptography technique. An OT protocol should have two important characteristics: sender's privacy and chooser's privacy. The sender is a party who will deliver a secret to chooser. The chooser is another party who acts as receiver to learn some information about input from sender. The chooser learns of certain information concerning sender's input while sender is not allowed to know what chooser has learned. Moreover, chooser cannot acquire any messages that he/she did not choose. Naor and Pinkas have recently proposed an efficient oblivious transfer protocol (EOT) that implementes 1-out-of-n protocol, but this EOT has a flaw: it cannot withstand the same message attack. In this paper, we will improve Naor and Pinkas EOT and make it resistant to the same message attack.
Secure two-party computation allows two parties to evaluate a function on their private inputs while keeping all information private except what can be inferred from the outputs. A major building block and the foundation for many efficient secure computation protocols is oblivious transfer (OT). In an OT protocol a sender inputs two messages (x_{0}, x_{1}) while a receiver with choice bit c wants to receive message x_{c}.The OT protocol execution guarantees that the sender learns no information about c and the receiver learns no information about x_{1−c}. This thesis focuses on the efficient generation of OTs and their use in secure computation. In particular, we show how to compute OTs more efficiently, improve generic secure computation protocols which can be used to securely evaluate any functionality, and develop highly efficient special-purpose protocols for private set intersection (PSI). We outline our contributions in more detail next. More Efficient OT Extensions. The most efficient OT protocols are based on public-key cryptography and require a constant number of exponentiations per OT. However, for many practical applications where millions to billions of OTs need to be computed, these exponentiations become prohibitively slow. To enable these applications, OT extension protocols [Bea96, IKNP03] can be used, which extend a small number of public-key-based OTs to an arbitrarily large number using cheap symmetric-key cryptography only. We improve the computation and communication efficiency of OT extension protocols and show how to achieve security against malicious adversaries, which can arbitrarily deviate from the protocol, at low overhead. Our resulting protocols can compute several million of OTs per second and we show that, in contrast to previous belief, the local computation overhead for computing OTs is so low that the main bottleneck is the network bandwidth. Parts of these results are published in: • G. Asharov, Y. Lindell, T. Schneider, M. Zohner. More Efficient Oblivious Transfer and Extensions for Faster Secure Computation. In 20th ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security (CCS’13). • G. Asharov, Y. Lindell, T. Schneider, M. Zohner. More Efficient Oblivious Transfer Extensions with Security for Malicious Adversaries. In 34th Advances in Cryptology – EUROCRYPT’15. • G. Asharov, Y. Lindell, T. Schneider, M. Zohner. More Efficient Oblivious Transfer Extensions. To appear in Journal of Cryptology. Online at http://eprint.iacr.org/2016/602. Communication-Efficient Generic Secure Two-Party Computation. Generic secure two-party computation techniques allow to evaluate a function, represented as a circuit of linear (XOR) and non-linear (AND) gates. One of the most prominent generic secure two-party computation protocols is Yao’s garbled circuits [Yao86], for which many optimizations have been proposed. Shortly after Yao’s protocol, the generic secure protocol by Goldreich-Micali-Wigderson (GMW) [GMW87] was introduced. The GMW protocol requires a large number of OTs and was believed to be less efficient for secure two-party computation than Yao’s protocol [HL10, CHK+12]. We improve the efficiency of the GMW protocol and show that it can outperform Yao’s garbled circuits protocol in settings with low bandwidth. Furthermore, we utilize the flexibility of OT and outline special-purpose constructions that can be used within the GMW protocol and which improve its efficiency even further. Parts of these results are published in: • T. Schneider, M. Zohner. GMW vs. Yao? Efficient Secure Two-Party Computation with Low Depth Circuits. In 17th International Conference on Financial Cryptography and Data Security (FC’13). • D. Demmler, T. Schneider, M. Zohner. ABY - A Framework for Efficient Mixed-Protocol Secure Two-Party Computation. In 22th Network and Distributed System Security Symposium (NDSS’15). • G. Dessouky, F. Koushanfar, A.-R. Sadeghi, T. Schneider, S. Zeitouni, M. Zohner. Pushing the Communication Barrier in Secure Computation using Lookup Tables. In 24th Network and Distributed System Security Symposium (NDSS’17). Faster Private Set Intersection (PSI). PSI allows two parties to compute the intersection of their private sets without revealing any element that is not in the intersection. PSI is a well-studied problem in secure computation and many special-purpose protocols have been proposed. However, existing PSI protocols are several orders of magnitude slower than an insecure naive hashing solution that is used in practice. In addition, many protocols were compared in a biased fashion, which makes it difficult to identify the most promising solution for a particular scenario. We systematize the progress made on PSI protocols by reviewing, optimizing, and comparing existing PSI protocols. We then introduce a novel PSI protocol that is based on our efficiency improvements in OT extension protocols and which outperforms existing protocols by up to two orders of magnitude. Parts of these results are published in: • B. Pinkas, T. Schneider, M. Zohner. Faster Private Set Intersection Based on OT Extension. In 23th USENIX Security Symposium (USENIX Security’14). • B. Pinkas, T. Schneider, G. Segev, M. Zohner. Phasing: Private Set Intersection using Permutation-based Hashing. In 24th USENIX Security Symposium (USENIX Security’15). • B. Pinkas, T. Schneider, M. Zohner. Scalable Private Set Intersection Based on OT Extension. Journal paper. In submission. Online at http://iacr.eprint.org/2016/930.
In an adaptive oblivious transfer (OT) protocol, a sender commits to a database of messages and then repeatedly interacts with a receiver in such a way that the receiver obtains one message per interaction of his choice (and nothing more) while the sender learns nothing about any of the choices. Recently, there has been significant effort to design practical adaptive OT schemes and to use these protocols as a building block for larger database applications. To be well suited for these applications, the underlying OT protocol should: (1) support an efficient initialization phase where one commitment can support an arbitrary number of receivers who are guaranteed of having the same view of the database, (2) execute transfers in time independent of the size of the database, and (3) satisfy a strong notion of security under a simple assumption in the standard model. We present the first adaptive OT protocol simultaneously satisfying these requirements. The sole complexity assumption required is that given (g, g a, g b, g c, Q), where g generates a bilinear group of prime order p and a, b, c are selected randomly from Zp, it is hard to decide if Q = g abc. All prior protocols in the standard model either do not meet our efficiency requirements or
Oblivious transfer (OT) is one of the most fundamental primitives in cryptography and is widely used in protocols for secure two-party and multi-party computation. As secure com-putation becomes more practical, the need for practical large scale oblivious transfer protocols is becoming more evident. Oblivious transfer extensions are protocols that enable a relatively small number of “base-OTs ” to be utilized to compute a very large number of OTs at low cost. In the semi-honest setting, Ishai et al. (CRYPTO 2003) presented an OT extension protocol for which the cost of each OT (beyond the base-OTs) is just a few hash function operations. In the malicious setting, Nielsen et al. (CRYPTO 2012) presented an efficient OT extension protocol for the setting of active adversaries, that is secure in the random oracle model. In this work, we present an OT extension protocol for the setting of malicious adversaries that is more efficient and uses less communication than previous works. In addition, our protocol can be proven secure in both the random oracle model, and in the standard model with a type of correlation robustness. Given the importance of OT in many secure computation protocols, increasing the efficiency of OT extensions is another important step forward to making secure
Oblivious transfer protocol is an important primitive in modern cryptography. Since its introduction, the subject has attracted a lot of attentions and has become the basis for realizing a broad class of cryptographic protocols, such as secret key exchange, contract signing, secure function evaluation, oblivious keyword search, etc. This work describes protocols for proxy oblivious transfer, in which the role of the sender is divided between two proxies, and a receiver (chooser) must contact one proxy in order to run the oblivious transfer protocol and another for some extra information. This proxy oblivious transfer protocol provides a method for the sender to delegate a proxy to transfer one of his messages to a receiver on behalf of him. The proxy oblivious transfer protocol has the same security properties as the oblivious transfer protocol using in our protocol.