Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

American Journal of Physics

Quantum mechanics of the 1∕x2 potential

Andrew M. Essin, David J. Griffiths

Published Jan 17, 2006• 165 citations
Publisher

Abstract

In quantum mechanics a localized attractive potential typically supports a (possibly infinite) set of bound states, characterized by a discrete spectrum of allowed energies, together with a continuum of scattering states, characterized (in one dimension) by an energy-dependent phase shift. The 1∕x2 potential on 0<x<∞ confounds all of our intuitions and expectations. Resolving its paradoxes requires sophisticated theoretical machinery: regularization, renormalization, anomalous symmetry-breaking, and self-adjoint extensions. Our goal is to introduce the essential ideas at a level accessible to advanced undergraduates.

DOI
10.1119/1.2165248

Related papers

Self-Adjointness and the Renormalization of Singular Potentials

Sarang Gopalakrishnan, William Loinaz

Schrodinger operators with very singular potentials fail to produce reasonable spectra, because the usual boundary conditions are insufficient to make them self-adjoint. If one regularizes a singular potential at a length , the bound state energies diverge as → 0. A meaningful spectrum can be restored by picking a self-adjoint extension of the operator, by renormalizing the theory, or by allowing nonunitary time evolution. We show that renormalizations of the 1/r potential fall into two classes: those that are asymptotically equivalent to self-adjoint extensions, and those that reduce to treatments of delta functions. We also apply the apparatus of self-adjoint extensions and renormalization to clarify aspects of anomalous symmetry breaking, supersymmetric quantum mechanics, and one-dimensional quantum mechanics. Lines composed upon reading a thesis abstract by S. Gopalakrishnan Think a moment, dear reader, of that long-legged fly, The sprung meniscus underfoot, And what asymptotes invisible to well-trained eyes Still break the surface at its root. How a singular potential picks tight-bounded energy Apart till it no longer recognizes Its own mirrored face, its extensions, or symmetry; Unless one cautiously renormalizes. You have tried in these pensive pages to show the stuff Such theory’s made of, its quiddity When logic is applied to the diamond rough, And quantum notes ring purely. May Apollo’s clarity pierce through your reasoning And self-adjointed truth and fact Elevate your thought to that sense so pleasing When truth recovers nature’s pact.

•Jan 1, 2006•12 citations

Quantum mechanics without potential function

A. D. Alhaidari, M. E. H. Ismail

In the standard formulation of quantum mechanics, one starts by proposing a potential function that models the physical system. The potential is then inserted into the Schrödinger equation, which is solved for the wavefunction, bound states energy spectrum, and/or scattering phase shift. In this work, however, we propose an alternative formulation in which the potential function does not appear. The aim is to obtain a set of analytically realizable systems, which is larger than in the standard formulation and may or may not be associated with any given or previously known potential functions. We start with the wavefunction, which is written as a bounded infinite sum of elements of a complete basis with polynomial coefficients that are orthogonal on an appropriate domain in the energy space. Using the asymptotic properties of these polynomials, we obtain the scattering phase shift, bound states, and resonances. This formulation enables one to handle not only the well-known quantum systems but also previously untreated ones. Illustrative examples are given for two- and three-parameter systems.

arXiv:1408.4003•Journal of Mathematical Physics•Jul 1, 2015•41 citations

Self-adjoint extensions of operators and the teaching of quantum mechanics

Guy Bonneau, Jacques Faraut, Galliano Valent A

For the example of the infinite well potential, we point out some paradoxes which are solved by a careful analysis of what is a truly self-adjoint operator. We then describe the self-adjoint extensions and their spectra for the momentum and the Hamiltonian operators in different settings. Additional physical requirements such as parity, time reversal, and positivity are used to restrict the large class of self-adjoint extensions of the Hamiltonian.

arXiv:quant-ph/0103153•American Journal of Physics•Mar 1, 2001•313 citations

Numerical and analytical study of the bound states of the −α/x2 potential

Thanh Nguyen, F. Marsiglio

The quantum mechanical bound states of the −α/x2 potential are truly anomalous. We revisit this problem by adopting a slightly modified version of this potential, one that adopts a cutoff in the potential arbitrarily close to the origin. The resulting solutions are completely well-defined and “normal,” and provide us with additional insight into the solutions of the “bare” −α/x2 potential. We present results here as a case study in undergraduate research—two independent methodologies are used: one analytical (albeit with very unfamiliar non-elementary functions) and one numerical (with a very straightforward methodology). These play complementary roles in arriving at solutions and achieving insights into this problem.

American Journal of Physics•Aug 19, 2020•8 citations

Quantum exotic: a repulsive and bottomless confining potential

Miloslav Znojil

On a simple model we demonstrate that even in a classically repulsive regime (i.e. at couplings which make the potential decreasing to in some directions) quantum mechanics may still support the purely discrete spectrum of bound states. In our example, there exists a critical boundary of this domain of stability where a further increase of repulsion causes an explosive escape of particles in infinity.

arXiv:1511.08885•Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General•Apr 10, 1998•9 citations

Scattering and bound states by localized potentials

Antonio S. de Castro

A simple formalism for exploring quantum scattering and possible bound states in an arbitrary symmetric and localized potential in a unified way is presented. The symmetric square barrier and well potentials are used for illustrating the method.

arXiv:1010.2649•Oct 13, 2010•0 citations
In quantum mechanics a localized attractive potential typically supports a (possibly infinite) set of bound states, characterized by a discrete spectrum of allowed energies, together with a continuum of scattering states, characterized (in one dimension) by an energy-dependent phase shift. The 1∕x2 potential on 0<x<∞ confounds all of our intuitions and expectations. Resolving its paradoxes requires sophisticated theoretical machinery: regularization, renormalization, anomalous symmetry-breaking, and self-adjoint extensions. Our goal is to introduce the essential ideas at a level accessible to advanced undergraduates.
Schrodinger operators with very singular potentials fail to produce reasonable spectra, because the usual boundary conditions are insufficient to make them self-adjoint. If one regularizes a singular potential at a length , the bound state energies diverge as → 0. A meaningful spectrum can be restored by picking a self-adjoint extension of the operator, by renormalizing the theory, or by allowing nonunitary time evolution. We show that renormalizations of the 1/r potential fall into two classes: those that are asymptotically equivalent to self-adjoint extensions, and those that reduce to treatments of delta functions. We also apply the apparatus of self-adjoint extensions and renormalization to clarify aspects of anomalous symmetry breaking, supersymmetric quantum mechanics, and one-dimensional quantum mechanics. Lines composed upon reading a thesis abstract by S. Gopalakrishnan Think a moment, dear reader, of that long-legged fly, The sprung meniscus underfoot, And what asymptotes invisible to well-trained eyes Still break the surface at its root. How a singular potential picks tight-bounded energy Apart till it no longer recognizes Its own mirrored face, its extensions, or symmetry; Unless one cautiously renormalizes. You have tried in these pensive pages to show the stuff Such theory’s made of, its quiddity When logic is applied to the diamond rough, And quantum notes ring purely. May Apollo’s clarity pierce through your reasoning And self-adjointed truth and fact Elevate your thought to that sense so pleasing When truth recovers nature’s pact.
In the standard formulation of quantum mechanics, one starts by proposing a potential function that models the physical system. The potential is then inserted into the Schrödinger equation, which is solved for the wavefunction, bound states energy spectrum, and/or scattering phase shift. In this work, however, we propose an alternative formulation in which the potential function does not appear. The aim is to obtain a set of analytically realizable systems, which is larger than in the standard formulation and may or may not be associated with any given or previously known potential functions. We start with the wavefunction, which is written as a bounded infinite sum of elements of a complete basis with polynomial coefficients that are orthogonal on an appropriate domain in the energy space. Using the asymptotic properties of these polynomials, we obtain the scattering phase shift, bound states, and resonances. This formulation enables one to handle not only the well-known quantum systems but also previously untreated ones. Illustrative examples are given for two- and three-parameter systems.
The quantum mechanical bound states of the −α/x2 potential are truly anomalous. We revisit this problem by adopting a slightly modified version of this potential, one that adopts a cutoff in the potential arbitrarily close to the origin. The resulting solutions are completely well-defined and “normal,” and provide us with additional insight into the solutions of the “bare” −α/x2 potential. We present results here as a case study in undergraduate research—two independent methodologies are used: one analytical (albeit with very unfamiliar non-elementary functions) and one numerical (with a very straightforward methodology). These play complementary roles in arriving at solutions and achieving insights into this problem.