As is well known, there are several formulations of quantum mechanics. One of them, closely connected with the Weyl representation of operators [ 1 ] and Wigner functions [ 2 ], use functions on the phase space to represent both observables and quantum states. For working in this representation it is necessary to replace operators by their Weyl symbols and density matrices by Wigner functions [ 3 , 4 ]. After fundamental works of Weyl, Wigner and Kirkwood [ 1 , 2 , 5 ] properties of the representation were studied and used to calculate the properties of various physical systems (see [ 6–23 ]), including systems with magnetic field [ 15–23 ].
The Wigner-Weyl (WW) phase-space formulation of quantum mechanics is discussed within the Liouville-space formalism, where quantum operators A^ are viewed as vectors, represented by L kets \ensuremath{\Vert}A^>>, on which act ``superoperators''; the scalar product is A^\ensuremath{\Vert}B^>>=TrA${\mathrm{^}}^{\mathrm{\ifmmode^\circ\else\textdegree\fi{}}}$B^. With every operator A^, we associate commutation and anticommutation superoperators A${\mathrm{^}}^{\mathrm{\ensuremath{-}}}$ and A${\mathrm{^}}^{+}$, defined by their actions on any operator B^ as A${\mathrm{^}}^{\mathrm{\ensuremath{-}}}$B^=${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Elzxh}}}^{\mathrm{\ensuremath{-}}1}$[A^,B^], A${\mathrm{^}}^{+}$B^=1/2(A^B^+B^A^). The WW representation corresponds to the choice of a special basis in Liouville space, namely, the eigenbasis of the position and momentum anticommutation superoperators q${\mathrm{^}}^{+}$ and p${\mathrm{^}}^{+}$ (where [q^,p^]=i\ensuremath{\Elzxh}). These, together with the commutation superoperators q${\mathrm{^}}^{\mathrm{\ensuremath{-}}}$ and p${\mathrm{^}}^{\mathrm{\ensuremath{-}}}$, form a canonical set of superoperators, [q${\mathrm{^}}^{+}$,p${\mathrm{^}}^{\mathrm{\ensuremath{-}}}$]=[q${\mathrm{^}}^{\mathrm{\ensuremath{-}}}$,p${\mathrm{^}}^{+}$]=i (the other commutators vanishing), as functions of which all other super- operators can be expressed. Weyl ordering is expressed as f(q^,p^
)Weyl ordering=f(q${\mathrm{^}}^{+}$,p${\mathrm{^}}^{+}$)1^. A generalization of Ehrenfest's theorem is obtained.
This thesis addresses aspects of quantum phase and sets out to draw attention to a collection of new and extend some not so new techniques utilizing Weyl's correspondence rule and its inverse. The phase formulation of quantum mechanics is as old as quantum mechanics itself and evolved over a period of two decades due to the contributions of H. Weyl \cite{Weyl1950}, E. P. Wigner \cite{Wigner1932}, H. Groenewold \cite{Groenewold1946} and J. E. Moyal \cite{Moyal1949}. Over the ensuing years the phase picture has matured into a practical analytical tool, and has generated a multitude of technical papers, reports, reviews, and expositions from many authors and commentators. One reason for its success is that it offers an intuitive picture of quantum mechanics owing to its \it{classical look and feel}, and it has made an impression, in one way or another, in many fields such as mathematical physics, quantum optics, and physical chemistry.The thesis opens with a brief history of classical phase space, tracing the possible origin of the term ``phase space itself, and chronicles the events leading to the conceptualization (and generalization) of quantum phase space. In Chapter 2 the Weyl correspondence is recast in terms of von Neumann's integral kernel transform and a heuristic analysis is given from this perspective. A characteristic of Weyl's correspondence rule and its inverse is that there are two inherent representations of the same operator. These have been referred to as the Weyl representation and Wigner representation and are related by a symplectic Fourier transform. For an arbitrary outer dyadic operator it is shown that the Weyl representation leads to the \it{modified} Gabor transform (known to Signal Processing), while the Wigner representation specializes to the Bargmann transform and a representation in terms of analytic functions. Calculating Weyl-Wigner (WW) transforms of products of
n operators, from first principles, has proved to be a technically difficult problem. However, with the machinery developed in Chapter 2 the problem is reduced to a straightforward algebraic exercise. Finally, forming an
s-parametrized generalization of Weyl's correspondence rule and focusing on the Weyl representation it is shown to lead to an intimate relationship with the relative state formalism \cite{Ban1998}. Weyl's correspondence rule is only applicable to operators and consequently state vectors
∣ψ⟩ are not represented in the usual formulation of quantum phase space. This problem is circumvented in Chapter 3 by introducing the notion of a normalized fixed state (or window) vector
∣φ0⟩ to form an outer dyadic product $\wh{\Psi} = |\psi\rangle\langle\varphi_0|$. The WW transform of this product under the action of the Weyl's rule is a complex valued function of real variables called a phase amplitude and denoted by the symbol
Ψ. The phase amplitudes have many (and sometimes surprising) properties. For example they: \begin{itemize} \item form the building blocks of Wigner functions
W by admitting a generalized Born rule
W=Ψ⋆Ψˉ, and as such can be considered to be a more fundamental objects than Wigner functions; \item superpose and interfere like the state vectors they represent; \item specialize to the Bargmann and Gabor transforms when a Gaussian window is chosen; \end{itemize} \ni In Chapter 4 further aspects of phase amplitudes are explored and discussed. For example it is shown that they: \begin{itemize} \item define phase state vectors which form an over complete set and are elements of a reproducing kernel Hilbert space; \item allow unitary ray representations of the group symmetries of translation, rotation and time reversal; \item evolve in phase under the influence of a propagator
R which is intimately related to the Wigner propagator
P. \end{itemize} Chapter 5 considers an extension of phase amplitudes to include systems with finitely many degrees of freedom. These are called spin amplitudes and are obtained by first forming the outer dyadic product of a spin state vector with an arbitrary fixed spin state vector, and then applying a finite-dimensional analogue of the WW transform. The spin amplitude operator is represented as an
n×n matrix, whose elements are products of the spin components of the spin and fixed state vectors. Two kinds of spin amplitudes are considered, arising on the sphere
S2 or on a
(2j+1) dimensional lattice. In the special case of spin-$\half$ systems it is shown that the spin amplitudes transform as spinors under rotations on both the sphere and lattice. As a physical application the spin amplitudes for a spin-$\half$ magnetic dipole are found for a Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) environment. Chapter 6 considers Schwinger's abstract approach to quantum mechanics which takes into account the inability to indefinitely compensate for fluctuations in the measurement process. The resulting measurement algebra provides a symbolic representation of the physical laws as opposed to the mathematical abstraction (of von Neumann and Dirac) that was justified \it{\'a posteriori} by being in agreement with experiment. Despite Schwinger's prolific work on the subject of measurement algebra, its interpretation in quantum phase remained an open issue. It is shown that the key to formulating a quantum phase in terms of the measurement operators and transformation functions is the determination of a suitable set of basis operators for an arbitrary measurement operator. Many new results follow as a consequence of expanding an arbitrary measurement operator in this basis. In Chapter 7 the quantum-classical interface is explored by considering Hamilton's principal function or action
S(q,v,t). Starting from a purely heuristic classical argument, a phase function
U(p,q,t) is derived in terms of the classical action and is shown to be proportional to the WW transform of the quantum evolution operator. This association leads to the transform \be U(p,q,t) = A(t) \int e^{ipv/\hbar} e^{iS(q,v,t)/\hbar} \; \rm{d}v, \ee which enables one, in principle, to deduce the Wigner functions of a given system when only the classical action is known. Simple physical systems are used to provide examples illustrating this approach.
Although it was in fact the study of the Wigner distribution function that suggested to the author the general problem discussed in Part I, a consideration of the question of the formation of quantum mechanical operators corresponding to dynamical variables, being of fundamental importance to quantum theory, should properly precede a discussion of the Wigner distribution function. In both Parts I and II spin and relativistic effects will be ignored.\nA word about notation is in order. A symbol such as A will denote the quantum mechanical operator corresponding to the dynamical quantity A. For example, H is the Hamiltonian operator; q is the coordinate operator and p the conjugate momentum operator. Whenever there is a possibility of confusion, O(A) is used to represent the operator corresponding to the dynamical quantity A. For example, O(pq) is the operator corresponding to the product pq, and O(H2) is the operator corresponding to the square of the classical Hamiltonian.\nA subscript appearing on a differential operator, such as in 66PH , indicates the function on which the operator acts. Unless otherwise indicated all integrations are to be taken from -infinity to infinity. As usual, h denotes Planck's constant divided by 2pi.\nSince any physical investigation is directly dependent on the quality of the tools used in the investigation, mathematical rigor is much to be desired in physical theory. That rigor has not been achieved in this work is all too obvious, but it was nonetheless a constant goal.