Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Springer eBooks

Alternative Protocols for Generalized Oblivious Transfer

Bhavani Shankar, Kannan Srinathan, Chandrasekharan Pandu Rangan

Published Dec 19, 2007• 50 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-3-540-77444-0_31

Related papers

Protocols for Authenticated Oblivious Transfer

Mehrad Jaberi, Hamid Mala

Modares Journal of Electrical Engineering•Oct 1, 2016•0 citations

Oblivious Transfer Based on Key Exchange

Abhishek Parakh

Key-exchange protocols have been overlooked as a possible means for implementing oblivious transfer (OT). In this article, we present protocols for mutual exchange of secrets, 1-out-of-2 OT and coin-flipping similar to the Diffie-Hellman protocol using the idea of obliviously exchanging encryption keys. Since the Diffie-Hellman scheme is widely used, our protocol may provide a useful alternative to the conventional methods for implementation of oblivious transfer and a useful primitive in building larger cryptographic schemes.

arXiv:0705.0178•Cryptologia•Jan 10, 2008•13 citations

Black-Box Constructions of Protocols for Secure Computation

Iftach Haitner, Yuval Ishai, Eyal Kushilevitz Z +2 more

In this paper, we study the question of whether or not it is possible to construct protocols for general secure computation in the setting of malicious adversaries and no honest majority that use the underlying primitive (e.g., enhanced trapdoor permutation) in a black-box way only. Until now, all known general constructions for this setting were inherently non-black-box since they required the parties to prove zero-knowledge statements that are related to the computation of the underlying primitive. Our main technical result is a fully black-box reduction from oblivious transfer with security against malicious parties to oblivious transfer with security against semihonest parties. As a corollary, we obtain the first constructions of general multiparty protocols (with security against malicious adversaries and without an honest majority) which make only a black-box use of semihonest oblivious transfer, or alternatively a black-box use of lower-level primitives such as enhanced trapdoor permutations or homomorphic encryption. In order to construct this reduction we introduce a new notion of security called privacy in the presence of defensible adversaries. This notion states that if an adversary can produce (retroactively, after the protocol terminates) an input and random tape that make its actions appear to be honest, then it is guaranteed that it learned nothing more than its prescribed output. We then show how to construct defensible oblivious transfer from semihonest oblivious transfer, and malicious oblivious transfer from defensible oblivious transfer, all in a black-box way.

SIAM Journal on Computing•Jan 1, 2011•44 citations

Practical Oblivious Transfer Protocols

Christian Tobias

Springer eBooks•Aug 12, 2007•9 citations

Generalized oblivious transfer by secret sharing

Tamir Tassa

Designs Codes and Cryptography•Mar 13, 2010•74 citations

Oblivious transfer

Martin Mach

This work examines the part of an asymmetric cryptography called an oblivious transfer. Our goal is to bring a comprehensive overwiew about particular variants of an oblivious transfer and to describe construcions of these variants. A component of the work is an introduction of definitions needed for proving the security of protocols which implements the schemes. We are examining the security of protocols in a semi-honest model. There is informatively explained Rabin's oblivious transfer, but we mainly focused on so-called 1-2, 1-n and m-n alternatives of an oblivious transfer. We mention at least one scheme for each alternative, which we have proven that it is secured. Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

•Jan 1, 2015•0 citations
Key-exchange protocols have been overlooked as a possible means for implementing oblivious transfer (OT). In this article, we present protocols for mutual exchange of secrets, 1-out-of-2 OT and coin-flipping similar to the Diffie-Hellman protocol using the idea of obliviously exchanging encryption keys. Since the Diffie-Hellman scheme is widely used, our protocol may provide a useful alternative to the conventional methods for implementation of oblivious transfer and a useful primitive in building larger cryptographic schemes.
In this paper, we study the question of whether or not it is possible to construct protocols for general secure computation in the setting of malicious adversaries and no honest majority that use the underlying primitive (e.g., enhanced trapdoor permutation) in a black-box way only. Until now, all known general constructions for this setting were inherently non-black-box since they required the parties to prove zero-knowledge statements that are related to the computation of the underlying primitive. Our main technical result is a fully black-box reduction from oblivious transfer with security against malicious parties to oblivious transfer with security against semihonest parties. As a corollary, we obtain the first constructions of general multiparty protocols (with security against malicious adversaries and without an honest majority) which make only a black-box use of semihonest oblivious transfer, or alternatively a black-box use of lower-level primitives such as enhanced trapdoor permutations or homomorphic encryption. In order to construct this reduction we introduce a new notion of security called privacy in the presence of defensible adversaries. This notion states that if an adversary can produce (retroactively, after the protocol terminates) an input and random tape that make its actions appear to be honest, then it is guaranteed that it learned nothing more than its prescribed output. We then show how to construct defensible oblivious transfer from semihonest oblivious transfer, and malicious oblivious transfer from defensible oblivious transfer, all in a black-box way.
This work examines the part of an asymmetric cryptography called an oblivious transfer. Our goal is to bring a comprehensive overwiew about particular variants of an oblivious transfer and to describe construcions of these variants. A component of the work is an introduction of definitions needed for proving the security of protocols which implements the schemes. We are examining the security of protocols in a semi-honest model. There is informatively explained Rabin's oblivious transfer, but we mainly focused on so-called 1-2, 1-n and m-n alternatives of an oblivious transfer. We mention at least one scheme for each alternative, which we have proven that it is secured. Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)