This work examines the part of an asymmetric cryptography called an oblivious transfer. Our goal is to bring a comprehensive overwiew about particular variants of an oblivious transfer and to describe construcions of these variants. A component of the work is an introduction of definitions needed for proving the security of protocols which implements the schemes. We are examining the security of protocols in a semi-honest model. There is informatively explained Rabin's oblivious transfer, but we mainly focused on so-called 1-2, 1-n and m-n alternatives of an oblivious transfer. We mention at least one scheme for each alternative, which we have proven that it is secured. Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
This work examines the part of an asymmetric cryptography called an oblivious transfer. Our goal is to bring a comprehensive overwiew about particular variants of an oblivious transfer and to describe construcions of these variants. A component of the work is an introduction of definitions needed for proving the security of protocols which implements the schemes. We are examining the security of protocols in a semi-honest model. There is informatively explained Rabin's oblivious transfer, but we mainly focused on so-called 1-2, 1-n and m-n alternatives of an oblivious transfer. We mention at least one scheme for each alternative, which we have proven that it is secured. Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Oblivious transfer, first introduced by Rabin, is one of the basic building blocks of cryp-tographic protocols. In an oblivious transfer (or more exactly, in its 1-out-of-2 variant), one party known as the sender has a pair of messages and the other party known as the receiver obtains one of them. Somewhat paradoxically, the receiver obtains exactly one of the messages (and learns nothing of the other), and the sender does not know which of the messages the receiver obtained. Due to its importance as a building block for secure protocols, the efficiency of oblivious transfer protocols has been extensively studied. However, to date, there are almost no known oblivious transfer protocols that are secure in the presence of malicious adversaries under the real/ideal model simulation paradigm (without using general zero-knowledge proofs). Thus, efficient protocols that reach this level of security are of great interest. In this paper we present efficient oblivious transfer protocols that are secure according to the ideal/real model simulation paradigm. We achieve constructions under the DDH, Nth residuosity and quadratic residuosity assumptions, as well as under the assumption that homomorphic encryption exists. 1
Oblivious transfer is a primitive of paramount importance in cryptography or, more precisely, two- and multi-party computation due to its universality. Unfortunately, oblivious transfer cannot be achieved in an unconditionally secure way for both parties from scratch. Therefore, it is a natural question what information-theoretic primitives or computational assumptions oblivious transfer can be based on. The results in our thesis are threefold. First, we present a protocol that implements oblivious transfer from a weakened oblivious transfer called universal oblivious transfer, where one of the two players may get additional information. Our reduction is about twice as efficient as previous results. Weak oblivious transfer is an even weaker form of oblivious transfer, where both players may obtain additional information about the other player's input, and where the output can contain errors. We give a new, weaker definition of weak oblivious transfer, as well as new reductions with a more detailed analysis. Finally, we carry over our results to the computational setting and show how a weak oblivious transfer that is sometimes incorrect and only mildly secure against computationally bounded adversaries can be strengthened.
The security of digital goods buyers and sellers is unbalanced. Of course, the property of sellers is protected; for example, when customers acquire digital books or films from Internet's merchants, they only receive the products they have paid for. Unfortunately, the buyers' privacy is rarely respected: purchases are often — without the buyers' knowledge — monitored, recorded, analysed, and sometimes sold to marketing companies. As a consequence, even if the customers do not intend to acquire additional products, their computer screens are later invaded with targeted advertisements. The main purpose of this thesis is to propose some methods to restore the balance and guarantee the buyers' privacy, while protecting the interests of the sellers. To this end, it is worth looking into the area of cryptography and more specifically, it is worth studying and designing some protocols called distributed oblivious transfer (DOT) protocols. A DOT protocol allows a party A to obtain one of the secret pieces of information (a secret for short) held by a party B so that the following two fundamental conditions are satisfied: • A chooses the secrets she wishes to obtain and does not obtain anything on the secrets she has not chosen, • B does not learn which secret was obtained by A. Furthermore, to improve the availability of the information, the protocol is distributed. That is, the party B transmits his secret information to m servers and the party A needs to contact at least k of these servers to obtain the chosen secret. The servers are not fully trusted, neither by A, nor by B. Therefore, from the information exchanged with A and B, no coalition of servers should be able to learn the secrets of B or the choice of A. The results of a preliminary literature review are surprising. In fact, the number of publications on DOT protocols is small (fewer than 20) compared to, for example, the number of publications on a similar concept, secret sharing (100s of publications). And yet, oblivious transfer is a fundamental component of more complex cryptographic protocols such as multi-party computation protocols, which allow a group of participants to securely calculate any function of their joint secret inputs. So, one could expect many variants, for example of the original DOT protocol introduced in 2002 by Naor and Pinkas [74], to fulfil the requirements of specific scenarios. The design of variants of DOT protocols in traditional cryptography has been the guiding thread of my research. My contribution mainly consists in (a) a critical analysis of the existing protocols, demonstrating their limitations, weaknesses, and in some cases, flaws; and (b) the design of the following protocols,well adapted to some specific situations: A Strongly Secure DOT Protocol. This DOT protocol addresses the most important weakness of unconditionally secure, one-round, polynomial interpolation-based DOT protocols: after the protocol has been executed, if the party A corrupts only one server, she can learn all the secrets of the party B. The protocol is secure even if A corrupts up to k - 1 servers. A Verifiable DOT Protocol. The party A should obtain the secret she has chosen, even when some servers are controlled by a malicious adversary whose objective is to sabotage the protocol. This is the case with this protocol, assuming that the adversary cannot control more than k - 1 servers. A Multiple Secrets DOT Protocol. When the party A wishes to obtain n > 1 secrets, the current protocols have to be executed n times. In this context, they are inefficient. The DOT protocol introduced here allows the party A, by contacting in the same session k - 1 + n servers, to collect n secrets. Adaptive DOT Protocols. The previous protocol allows the party A to request several secrets. However, the request of one secret may depend on the values of secrets already obtained. Two efficient protocols are presented in this scenario. The first one allows A to receive a limited number of secrets and therefore, is well adapted to a single receiver. For several receivers, a second protocol is proposed. This second protocol accepts an unlimited number of queries, but requires communications amongst the servers. A Threshold DOT protocol. Most existing DOT protocols rely on threshold secret sharing schemes. In a k-threshold protocol or scheme, security is guaranteed not only when k parties are contacted, but also when more than k parties are contacted. However, the existing DOT protocols based on k-threshold secret sharing schemes require an additional mechanism to control that exactly k servers are contacted, which is an under-utilisation of the underlying functionality. The proposed protocol is the first k-threshold DOT protocol which allows the party A to contact as many servers as she wishes to obtain the chosen secret, provided that at least k servers are contacted. This research is limited to unconditionally secure protocols, i.e., protocols whose security does not depend on mathematical (unproven) assumptions; within the limits of the given security models, the protocols are secure even against an adversary with unlimited computing power and time. In brief, the results presented in this thesis are a significant advance to the state of the art research on DOT protocols because on one hand, they point out the weaknesses of the DOT protocols most commonly accepted by the cryptographic community and on the other hand, they contribute to the cryptographic field through the design of new protocols, secure and efficient.
) Claude Cr'epeau Department of Computer Science MIT Joe Kilian y Mathematics Department MIT Abstract A useful paradigm in studying cryptographic scenarios is that of protocol minimalism. That is, given a cryptographic model, one wishes to determine the simplest protocols one needs in order to be able to implement secure protocols in general. In the standard cryptographic model, this approach allows one to encapsulate ones cryptographic assumptions. In other, nonstandard scenarios, the approach can greatly simplifying the task of developing protocols without cryptographic assumptions. Oblivious transfer protocols, first introduced by Rabin [R], are conceptually very simple, yet can be used to implement a wide variety of protocols([EGL],[BCR1],[K]). The versatility of these games amply motivates a wider study of the power of simple two-party games. In this paper, we present some general techniques for establishing the cryptographic strength of a wide variety of games. As case studie...
Consider several parties that do not trust each other, yet they wish to correctly compute some common function of their local inputs while keeping these inputs private. This problem is known as "Secure Multi-Party Computation", and was introduced by Andrew Yao in 1982. Secure multi-party computations have some real world examples like electronic auctions, electronic voting or fingerprinting. In this thesis we consider the case where there are only two parties involved. This is known as "Secure Two-Party Computation". If there is a trusted third party called Carol, then the problem is pretty straightforward. The participating parties could hand their inputs in Carol who can compute the common function correctly and could return the outputs to the corresponding parties. The goal is to achieve (almost) the same result when there is no trusted third party. Cryptographic protocols are designed in order to solve these kinds of problems. These protocols are analyzed within an appropriate model in which the behavior of parties is structured. The basic level is called the Semi-Honest Model where parties are assumed to follow the protocol specification, but later can derive additional information based on the messages which have been received so far. A more realistic model is the so-called Malicious Model. The common approach is to first analyze a protocol in the semi-honest model and then later extend it into the malicious model. Any cryptographic protocol for secure two-party computation must satisfy the following security requirements: correctness, privacy and fairness. It must guarantee the correctness of the result while preserving the privacy of the parties’ inputs, even if one of the parties is malicious and behaves arbitrarily throughout the protocol. It must also guarantee fairness. This roughly means that whenever a party aborts the protocol prematurely, he or she should not have any advantage over the other party in discovering the output. The main question for researchers is to construct new protocols that achieve the above mentioned goals for secure multi-party computation. Of course, such protocols must be secure in a given model, as well as be as efficient as possible. In 1986, Yao presented the first general protocol for secure two-party computation which was applicable only to the semi-honest model. He uses a tool called "Garbled Circuit". Yao’s protocol uses the underlying primitives ("Pseudorandom Generator" and "Oblivious Transfer") as blackboxes which lead to efficient results. After Yao’s work many variants and improvements have been proposed for the malicious model. In this thesis, we design several new protocols for secure two-party computation based on Yao’s garbled circuit. Before we present the details of our new designs, we first show several weaknesses, security flaws or problems with the existing protocols in the literature. We first work in the semi-honest model and then extend it into the malicious model by presenting new protocols. Finally we add fairness to our protocol. Oblivious transfer (OT) is a fundamental primitive in modern cryptography which is useful for implementing protocols for secure multi-party computation. We study several variants of oblivious transfer in this thesis. We present a new protocol for the so-called "Committed OT". This protocol is very efficient in the sense that it is quite good in comparison to the most efficient committed OT protocols in the literature. The abovementioned flaw with the use of OT can be fixed with our committed oblivious transfer protocol. Furthermore, it is more general than all previous protocols, and, therefore, it is of independent interest. We also deal with fairness in this thesis. For protocols based on garbled circuit, so far only Benny Pinkas has presented a protocol in the literature for achieving fairness. We show a subtle problem with this protocol where the privacy of the inputs of one party can be compromised. We also describe this problem in detail which is in fact related to the fairness, and finally propose a more efficient scheme that does achieve fairness.