Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Quantum Electronics and Laser Science Conference

Experimental observation of nonclassical effects in a single detection rate

Aephraim M. Steinberg

Published May 12, 2000• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Abstract

Summary form only given. In any optical system, quantum and classical theory yield identical predictions for the mean intensity. The quantum mechanical predictions diverge from the classical theory only for higher order correlations. For this reason, typical quantum-interference experiments are performed by measuring coincidence rates between two or more detectors. The usual approximation, following Glauber, is that a single-photon counter fires at a rate proportional to the intensity, or number of incident photons per unit time. This approximation is so good and so entrenched that one routinely assumes that all singles-detection rates are insensitive to quantum effects. However, if one of these detectors fires, it cannot fire again for a characteristic time, called the dead-time. This characteristic of the detectors makes them highly nonlinear over times shorter than the dead-time, and thus sensitive to the higher order intensity correlations. In other words the detector has a different response for two photons arriving at different times, than for two photons arriving at the same time. We use the process of spontaneous parametric-downconversion (SPDC) to create correlated photon-pairs and send them through a polarization-based Hong-Ou-Mander interferometer. This quantum interferometer allows us to change the photon statistics without changing the intensity of the beams.

Related papers

Quantum interference using ultrafast spontaneous parametric down-conversion

Mete Atatüre, Alexander V. Sergienko, Bradley M. Jost +2 more

Summary form only given. Pairs of entangled photons display a complex quantum state that cannot be represented through a product of single-particle states. The spontaneous parametric down-conversion (SPDC) process, that takes place when a laser pulse pumps a second-order nonlinear crystal has become recently a convenient source of such nonclassical states of light in quantum optics experiments. Nonstationary effects are mainly observed when the pump pulse temporal duration is significantly shorter than the characteristic interaction time in the nonlinear crystal. We introduce a nonstationary theory of SPDC to describe the results of fourth-order quantum-interference experiments when no spectral filtering is applied to the down-converted fields. Experiments involving nonlinear SPDC crystals with three different lengths were performed. The ultraviolet laser pulses were obtained from a Ti:sapphire femtosecond laser with a second-harmonic generator. These pulses were used to pump nonlinear crystals to initiate the process of nonstationary spdc and generate orthogonally-polarized photon pairs. These pairs then went into a polarization interferometer, and the coincidence counts of the detectors at the two output ports of the interferometer were recorded.

Quantum Electronics and Laser Science Conference•Jan 20, 2003•0 citations

Experimental observation of nonclassical effects on single-photon detection rates

Kevin J. Resch, Jeff S. Lundeen, Aephraim M. Steinberg

It is often asserted that quantum effects can be observed in coincidence detection rates or other correlations, but never in the rate of single-photon detection. We observe nonclassical interference in a singles rate, thanks to the intrinsic nonlinearity of photon counters. This is due to a dependence of the effective detection efficiency on the quantum statistics of the light beam. Such measurements of detector response to photon pairs promise to shed light on the microscopic aspects of silicon photodetectors, and on general issues of quantum measurement and decoherence.

arXiv:quant-ph/0006056•Physical Review A•Jan 11, 2001•37 citations

Nonclassical and nonlocal effects in the interference of light

L. Mandeļ

Although we tend to think of optical interference as a classical wave phenomenon, recent experiments have revealed a number of effects that are not describable in classical terms. This is particularly true of interference effects involving the detection of a photon pair. We shall refer to them as fourth order interference, on the grounds that the joint probability density for the detection of one photon at r sub 1 at time t and another r sub 2 at time t is proportional to the fourth order correlation function of the field. This probability is readily measured when two photodetectors are positioned at r sub 1 and r sub 2 and the signals from the two detectors are fed to a coincidence counter that registers 'simultaneous' detections by the two detectors in coincidence. The topics covered include: fourth order interference measurements; the Franson experiment; and experimental test of the de Broglie guided wave theory.

•Feb 1, 1992•1 citation

Observation of correlated-photon statistics using a single detector

Yoon-Ho Kim, Warren P. Grice

We report experimental observations of correlated-photon statistics in the single-photon detection rate. The usual quantum interference in a two-photon polarization interferometer always accompanies a dip in the single-detector counting rate, regardless of whether a dip or a peak is seen in the coincidence rate. This effect is explained by taking into account all possible photon number states that reach the detector, rather than considering just the state postselected by the coincidence measurement. We also report an interferometeric scheme in which the interference peak or dip in the coincidence corresponds directly to a peak or a dip in the single-photon detection rate.

arXiv:quant-ph/0304067•Physical Review A•Jun 27, 2003•10 citations

Two-Photon Ghost Image and Interference-Diffraction

Yanhua H. Shih, Alexander V. Sergienko, T. B. Pittman +2 more

One of the most surprising consequences of quantum mechanics is entanglement of two or more distance particles. The two-particle entangled state was mathematically formulated by Schrodinger. Based on this unusual quantum behavior, EPR defined their 'physical reality' and then asked the question: 'Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?' One may not appreciate EPR's criterion of physical reality and insist that 'no elementary quantum phenomenon is a phenomenon until it is a recorded phenomenon'. Optical spontaneous parametric down conversion (SPDC) is the most effective mechanism to generate an EPR type entangled two-photon state. In SPDC, an optical beam, called the pump, is incident on a birefringent crystal. The pump is intense enough so that nonlinear effects lead to the conversion of pump photons into pairs of photons, historically called signal and idler. Technically, the SPDC is said to be type-1 or type-2, depending on whether the signal and idler beams have parallel or orthogonal polarization. The SPDC conversion efficiency is typically on the order of 10(exp -9) to 10(exp -11), depending on the SPDC nonlinear material. The signal and idler intensities are extremely low, only single photon detection devices can register them. The quantum entanglement nature of SPDC has been demonstrated in EPR-Bohm experiments and Bell's inequality measurements. The following two experiments were recently performed in our laboratory, which are more closely related to the original 1935 EPR gedankenezperiment. The first experiment is a two-photon optical imaging type experiment, which has been named 'ghost image' by the physics community. The signal and idler beams of SPDC are sent in different directions, so that the detection of the signal and idler photons can be performed by two distant photon counting detectors. An aperture object (mask) is placed in front of the signal photon detector and illuminated by the signal beam through a convex lens. Surprisingly, an image of this aperture is observed in the idler beam, by scanning the idler photon detector in the transverse plane of the idler beam, if we are sure that the idler photon detector 'catches' the 'twin brother' of the signal, which can be easily performed by a coincidence measurement. This effect is even more striking when we found that the object-lens-image relationship satisfies the Gaussian thin lens equation. The second experiment demonstrates two-photon 'ghost' interference-diffraction. The experimental set up is similar to the image experiment, except that rather than a lens and an aperture it is a Young's double-slit (or a single-slit) inserted into the path of the signal beam. We could not find any interference (or diffraction) pattern behind the slit. Surprisingly, an interference (or diffraction) pattern is observed when scanning the detector in the idler beam, if we are sure that the idler photon detector 'catches' the 'twin brother' of the signal.

•Jan 1, 1996•0 citations

Quantum interference by two temporally distinguishable pulses

Y.-H. Kim, Maria V. Chekhova, S. P. Kulik +1 more

We have experimentally demonstrated two-photon interference between biphoton amplitudes arising from two well-separated pump pulses. It is important to note the following. 1) The pump pulse intensity was low enough so that single counting rates of the detectors were kept much smaller than pulse repetition rates: the probability of having one spontaneous parametric down conversion (SPDC) photon pair per pulse in our experiment is negligible. Hence the interference cannot be explained as two SPDC photons from two pump pulses (one SPDC photon pair from each pulse) interfering at the detectors. The two pump pulses simply provide two biphoton amplitudes which could result in coincidence counts, and interference occurs between these two biphoton amplitudes only when they are indistinguishable. 2) The BBO crystal in our experiment was only 100 /spl mu/m thick, so the two-pulse did not exist in BBO at the same time at any moment. 3) Due to the delays in the interferometer (/spl tau/ /spl tau//sub 1/), the signal-idler never met at the beamsplitter. Therefore, the existence of two-photon interference cannot be viewed as the interference between the signal and idler photons. These three points again emphasize the fact that it is the indistinguishability of the two-photon Feynman alternatives for the biphoton amplitudes which is responsible for the two-photon quantum interference effects.

Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics Pacific Rim (CLEO-PR)•Jan 20, 2003•0 citations
Summary form only given. In any optical system, quantum and classical theory yield identical predictions for the mean intensity. The quantum mechanical predictions diverge from the classical theory only for higher order correlations. For this reason, typical quantum-interference experiments are performed by measuring coincidence rates between two or more detectors. The usual approximation, following Glauber, is that a single-photon counter fires at a rate proportional to the intensity, or number of incident photons per unit time. This approximation is so good and so entrenched that one routinely assumes that all singles-detection rates are insensitive to quantum effects. However, if one of these detectors fires, it cannot fire again for a characteristic time, called the dead-time. This characteristic of the detectors makes them highly nonlinear over times shorter than the dead-time, and thus sensitive to the higher order intensity correlations. In other words the detector has a different response for two photons arriving at different times, than for two photons arriving at the same time. We use the process of spontaneous parametric-downconversion (SPDC) to create correlated photon-pairs and send them through a polarization-based Hong-Ou-Mander interferometer. This quantum interferometer allows us to change the photon statistics without changing the intensity of the beams.
Summary form only given. Pairs of entangled photons display a complex quantum state that cannot be represented through a product of single-particle states. The spontaneous parametric down-conversion (SPDC) process, that takes place when a laser pulse pumps a second-order nonlinear crystal has become recently a convenient source of such nonclassical states of light in quantum optics experiments. Nonstationary effects are mainly observed when the pump pulse temporal duration is significantly shorter than the characteristic interaction time in the nonlinear crystal. We introduce a nonstationary theory of SPDC to describe the results of fourth-order quantum-interference experiments when no spectral filtering is applied to the down-converted fields. Experiments involving nonlinear SPDC crystals with three different lengths were performed. The ultraviolet laser pulses were obtained from a Ti:sapphire femtosecond laser with a second-harmonic generator. These pulses were used to pump nonlinear crystals to initiate the process of nonstationary spdc and generate orthogonally-polarized photon pairs. These pairs then went into a polarization interferometer, and the coincidence counts of the detectors at the two output ports of the interferometer were recorded.
It is often asserted that quantum effects can be observed in coincidence detection rates or other correlations, but never in the rate of single-photon detection. We observe nonclassical interference in a singles rate, thanks to the intrinsic nonlinearity of photon counters. This is due to a dependence of the effective detection efficiency on the quantum statistics of the light beam. Such measurements of detector response to photon pairs promise to shed light on the microscopic aspects of silicon photodetectors, and on general issues of quantum measurement and decoherence.
Although we tend to think of optical interference as a classical wave phenomenon, recent experiments have revealed a number of effects that are not describable in classical terms. This is particularly true of interference effects involving the detection of a photon pair. We shall refer to them as fourth order interference, on the grounds that the joint probability density for the detection of one photon at r sub 1 at time t and another r sub 2 at time t is proportional to the fourth order correlation function of the field. This probability is readily measured when two photodetectors are positioned at r sub 1 and r sub 2 and the signals from the two detectors are fed to a coincidence counter that registers 'simultaneous' detections by the two detectors in coincidence. The topics covered include: fourth order interference measurements; the Franson experiment; and experimental test of the de Broglie guided wave theory.
We report experimental observations of correlated-photon statistics in the single-photon detection rate. The usual quantum interference in a two-photon polarization interferometer always accompanies a dip in the single-detector counting rate, regardless of whether a dip or a peak is seen in the coincidence rate. This effect is explained by taking into account all possible photon number states that reach the detector, rather than considering just the state postselected by the coincidence measurement. We also report an interferometeric scheme in which the interference peak or dip in the coincidence corresponds directly to a peak or a dip in the single-photon detection rate.
One of the most surprising consequences of quantum mechanics is entanglement of two or more distance particles. The two-particle entangled state was mathematically formulated by Schrodinger. Based on this unusual quantum behavior, EPR defined their 'physical reality' and then asked the question: 'Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?' One may not appreciate EPR's criterion of physical reality and insist that 'no elementary quantum phenomenon is a phenomenon until it is a recorded phenomenon'. Optical spontaneous parametric down conversion (SPDC) is the most effective mechanism to generate an EPR type entangled two-photon state. In SPDC, an optical beam, called the pump, is incident on a birefringent crystal. The pump is intense enough so that nonlinear effects lead to the conversion of pump photons into pairs of photons, historically called signal and idler. Technically, the SPDC is said to be type-1 or type-2, depending on whether the signal and idler beams have parallel or orthogonal polarization. The SPDC conversion efficiency is typically on the order of 10(exp -9) to 10(exp -11), depending on the SPDC nonlinear material. The signal and idler intensities are extremely low, only single photon detection devices can register them. The quantum entanglement nature of SPDC has been demonstrated in EPR-Bohm experiments and Bell's inequality measurements. The following two experiments were recently performed in our laboratory, which are more closely related to the original 1935 EPR gedankenezperiment. The first experiment is a two-photon optical imaging type experiment, which has been named 'ghost image' by the physics community. The signal and idler beams of SPDC are sent in different directions, so that the detection of the signal and idler photons can be performed by two distant photon counting detectors. An aperture object (mask) is placed in front of the signal photon detector and illuminated by the signal beam through a convex lens. Surprisingly, an image of this aperture is observed in the idler beam, by scanning the idler photon detector in the transverse plane of the idler beam, if we are sure that the idler photon detector 'catches' the 'twin brother' of the signal, which can be easily performed by a coincidence measurement. This effect is even more striking when we found that the object-lens-image relationship satisfies the Gaussian thin lens equation. The second experiment demonstrates two-photon 'ghost' interference-diffraction. The experimental set up is similar to the image experiment, except that rather than a lens and an aperture it is a Young's double-slit (or a single-slit) inserted into the path of the signal beam. We could not find any interference (or diffraction) pattern behind the slit. Surprisingly, an interference (or diffraction) pattern is observed when scanning the detector in the idler beam, if we are sure that the idler photon detector 'catches' the 'twin brother' of the signal.
We have experimentally demonstrated two-photon interference between biphoton amplitudes arising from two well-separated pump pulses. It is important to note the following. 1) The pump pulse intensity was low enough so that single counting rates of the detectors were kept much smaller than pulse repetition rates: the probability of having one spontaneous parametric down conversion (SPDC) photon pair per pulse in our experiment is negligible. Hence the interference cannot be explained as two SPDC photons from two pump pulses (one SPDC photon pair from each pulse) interfering at the detectors. The two pump pulses simply provide two biphoton amplitudes which could result in coincidence counts, and interference occurs between these two biphoton amplitudes only when they are indistinguishable. 2) The BBO crystal in our experiment was only 100 /spl mu/m thick, so the two-pulse did not exist in BBO at the same time at any moment. 3) Due to the delays in the interferometer (/spl tau/ /spl tau//sub 1/), the signal-idler never met at the beamsplitter. Therefore, the existence of two-photon interference cannot be viewed as the interference between the signal and idler photons. These three points again emphasize the fact that it is the indistinguishability of the two-photon Feynman alternatives for the biphoton amplitudes which is responsible for the two-photon quantum interference effects.