Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A Mathematical and Physical Sciences

The theory of conditional invariance. I

Anthony Joseph

Published Jul 16, 1968• 1 citation

Abstract

Abstract In order to extend the use of group theoretical arguments to the problem of accidental degeneracy in quantum mechanics, a new type of constant of the motion, known as a conditional constant of the motion, is introduced. Such a quantity, instead of commuting with the Hamiltonian H for the system, satisfies the more general relation HA = A†H, where A† denotes the hermitian conjugate (adjoint) of the conditional constant of the motion A. This expression reduces, if A is hermitian, to the usual definition of a constant of the motion. Otherwise it defines a new type of invariance, and it is this which will be referred to as conditional invariance. A discussion of the difficulties arising from the lack of hermiticity of A, which is of course essential to its definition, is given. In particular it is shown, under fairly general conditions, that the process of introducing a variable parameter in the Hamiltonian enabling it to have simultaneous eigenfunctions with A, gives rise to an eigenvalue equation in this parameter with respect to which A may be chosen to be hermitian. Conditional invariance is contrasted with both dynamical and geometric invariance. It is found to be sometimes replaceable by either of the latter forms of invariance and for such, explicit conditions are given. Some applications of conditional invariance are discussed. These include a study of the crossing of potential energy curves, a new model of symmetry breaking, a possible means of calculating the exact number of bound states for certain potentials and conditions for the existence of bound states near to the continuum.

DOI: 10.1098/rspa.1968.0124

Related papers

Introduction to 𝒫𝒯-symmetric quantum theory

Carl M. Bender

In most introductory courses on quantum mechanics one is taught that the Hamiltonian operator must be Hermitian in order that the energy levels be real and that the theory be unitary (probability conserving). To express the Hermiticity of a Hamiltonian, one writes H = H †, where the symbol † denotes the usual Dirac Hermitian conjugation; that is, transpose and complex conjugate. In the past few years it has been recognized that the requirement of Hermiticity, which is often stated as an axiom of quantum mechanics, may be replaced by the less mathematical and more physical requirement of space – time reflection symmetry (𝒫𝒯 symmetry) without losing any of the essential physical features of quantum mechanics. Theories defined by non-Hermitian 𝒫𝒯-symmetric Hamiltonians exhibit strange and unexpected properties at the classical as well as at the quantum level. This paper explains how the requirement of Hermiticity can be evaded and discusses the properties of some non-Hermitian 𝒫𝒯-symmetric quantum theories.

arXiv:quant-ph/0501052Contemporary PhysicsJul 1, 2005497 citations

The quantum theory of the emission and absorption of radiation

P. A. M. Dirac

Abstract The new quantum theory, based on the assumption that the dynamical variables do not obey the commutative law of multiplication, has by now been developed sufficiently to form a fairly complete theory of dynamics. One can treat mathematically the problem of any dynamical system composed of a number of particles with instantaneous forces acting between them, provided it is describable by a Hamiltonian function, and one can interpret the mathematics physically by a quite definite general method. On the other hand, hardly anything has been done up to the present on quantum electrodynamics. The questions of the correct treatment of a system in which the forces are propagated with the velocity of light instead of instantaneously, of the production of an electromagnetic field by a moving electron, and of the reaction of this field on the electron have not yet been touched. In addition, there is a serious difficulty in making the theory satisfy all the requirements of the restricted principle of relativity, since a Hamiltonian function can no longer be used. This relativity question is, of course, connected with the previous ones, and it will be impossible to answer any one question completely without at the same time answering them all. However, it appears to be possible to build up a fairly satisfactory theory of the emission of radiation and of the reaction of the radiation field on the emitting system on the basis of a kinematics and dynamics which are not strictly relativistic. This is the main object of the present paper. The theory is noil-relativistic only on account of the time being counted throughout as a c-number, instead of being treated symmetrically with the space co-ordinates. The relativity variation of mass with velocity is taken into account without difficulty. The underlying ideas of the theory are very simple. Consider an atom interacting with a field of radiation, which we may suppose for definiteness to be confined in an enclosure so as to have only a discrete set of degrees of freedom. Resolving the radiation into its Fourier components, we can consider the energy and phase of each of the components to be dynamical variables describing the radiation field. Thus if Er is the energy of a component labelled r and θr is the corresponding phase (defined as the time since the wave was in a standard phase), we can suppose each Er and θr to form a pair of canonically conjugate variables. In the absence of any interaction between the field and the atom, the whole system of field plus atom will be describable by the Hamiltonian H ═ ΣrEr + Ho equal to the total energy, Ho being the Hamiltonian for the atom alone, since the variables Er, θr obviously satisfy their canonical equations of motion Er ═ — ∂H/∂θr ═ 0, θr ═ ∂H/∂Er ═ 1.

Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A Containing Papers of a Mathematical and Physical CharacterMar 1, 19272,288 citations

Framework for generalized Hamiltonian systems through reasonable postulates

Libo Jiang, Daniel R. Terno, Oscar Dahlsten

Hamiltonian mechanics describes the evolution of a system through its Hamiltonian. The Hamiltonian typically also represents the energy observable, a Noether-conserved quantity associated with the time invariance of the law of evolution. In both quantum and classical mechanics, Hamiltonian mechanics demands a precise relationship between time evolution and observable energy, albeit using slightly different terminology. We distill basic conditions satisfied in both quantum and classical mechanics, including canonical coordinate symmetries and inner product invariance. We express these conditions in the framework of generalized probabilistic theories, which includes generalizing the definition of energy eigenstates in terms of time-invariant properties of the Hamiltonian system. By postulating these conditions to hold, we derive a unified Hamiltonian system model. This unified framework describes quantum and classical mechanics in a consistent language, facilitating their comparison. We moreover discuss alternative theories: an equation of motion given by a mixture of commutation relations, an information-restricted version of quantum theory, and Spekken's toy theory. The findings give a deeper understanding of the Hamiltonian in quantum and classical theories and point to several potential research topics.

arXiv:2403.00038Physical Review AMar 21, 20246 citations

A tensorial theory of the higher-order constants of motion in quantum mechanics

S. Datta Majumdar

A general theory of quantum mechanical constants of motion of arbitrary order in the momenta is developed. Because of rotational invariance the theory assumes an elegant tensorial form. The fundamental equations for the nth-order constants of motion in m variables are set up in Cartesian coordinates. The first two equations of the set do not contain the potential function and their solutions are shown to be polynomials of degree n and n-1 with coefficients satisfying certain symmetry relations. The next two equations contain the first and the second derivatives of the potential function. From these equations all unknown functions are eliminated in the special cases n=3 and n=4. The elimination gives partial differential equations for the potential function, of second and third order for n=3, and third and fourth order for n=4. The possibility of extending the results to higher values of n is indicated.

Journal of Physics A Mathematical and GeneralMar 1, 19800 citations

Symmetries of the hamiltonian operator and constants of motion

G. F. Torres del Castillo, J.E. Herrera Flores

It is shown that, in the framework of non-relativistic quantum mechanics, any conserved Hermitian operator (which may depend explicitly on the time) is the generator of a one-parameter group of unitary symmetries of the Hamiltonian and that, conversely, any one-parameter family of unitary symmetries of the Hamiltonian is generated by a conserved Hermitian operator.

arXiv:1510.04876Revista Mexicana de FísicaJan 1, 20160 citations

Antilinearity rather than Hermiticity as a guiding principle for quantum theory

Philip D. Mannheim

Abstract Currently there is much interest in Hamiltonians that are not Hermitian but instead possess an antilinear PT symmetry. Here we seek to put such PT symmetric theories into as general a context as possible. After providing a brief overview of the PT symmetry program, we show that having an antilinear symmetry that acts on a well-defined Hilbert space is the most general condition that one can impose on a quantum theory for which one can have a well-defined inner product that is time independent, have a Hamiltonian that is self-adjoint, and have energy eigenvalues that are all real. For each of these properties Hermiticity is only a sufficient condition but not a necessary one, with Hermiticity thus being the special case in which the Hamiltonian has both antilinearity and Hermiticity. As well as being the necessary condition for the reality of energy eigenvalues, antilinearity in addition allows for the physically interesting cases of manifestly non-Hermitian but nonetheless self-adjoint Hamiltonians that have energy eigenvalues that appear in complex conjugate pairs, or that are Jordan block and cannot be diagonalized at all. We show that one can extend these ideas to quantum field theory, with the dual requirements of the existence of time independent inner products and invariance under complex Lorentz transformations forcing the antilinear symmetry to uniquely be CPT . We thus extend the CPT theorem to non-Hermitian Hamiltonians. For theories that are separately charge conjugation invariant, PT symmetry then follows, with the case for the physical relevance of the PT -symmetry program thus being advanced. While CPT symmetry can be defined at the classical level for every classical path in a path integral quantization procedure, in contrast, in such a path integral there is no reference at all to the Hermiticity of the Hamiltonian or the quantum Hilbert space on which it acts, as they are strictly quantum-mechanical concepts that can only be defined after the path integral quantization has been performed and the quantum Hilbert space has been constructed. CPT symmetry thus goes beyond Hermiticity and has primacy over it, with our work raising the question of how Hermiticity ever comes into quantum theory at all. To this end we show that whether or not a CPT -invariant theory has a Hamiltonian that is Hermitian is a property of the solutions to the theory and not of the Hamiltonian itself. Hermiticity thus never needs to be postulated at all.

arXiv:1512.04915Journal of Physics A Mathematical and TheoreticalApr 26, 201843 citations