We extend and generalize previous work on the interference of light from independent cavities that began with the suggestion of Pfleegor and Mandel [Phys. Rev. 159, 1084 (1967)] that their observed interference of laser beams should not be associated too closely with particular states of the beams but more with the detection process itself. In particular we examine how the detection of interference induces a nonrandom-phase difference between internal cavity states with initial random phases for a much broader range of such states than has previously been considered. We find that a subsequent interference measurement should give results consistent with the induced phase difference. The inclusion of more cavities in the interference measurements enables the construction in principle of a laboratory in the sense used by Aharonov and Susskind, made up of cavity fields that can serve as frames of phase reference. We also show reasonably simply how intrinsic phase coherence of a beam of light leaking from a single cavity arises for any internal cavity state, even a photon number state. Although the work presented here may have some implications for the current controversy over whether or not a typical laboratory laser produces a coherent state, it is not the purpose of this paper to enter this controversy; rather it is to examine the interesting quantum physics that arises for cavities with more general internal states.
We extend and generalize previous work on the interference of light from independent cavities that began with the suggestion of Pfleegor and Mandel [Phys. Rev. 159, 1084 (1967)] that their observed interference of laser beams should not be associated too closely with particular states of the beams but more with the detection process itself. In particular we examine how the detection of interference induces a nonrandom-phase difference between internal cavity states with initial random phases for a much broader range of such states than has previously been considered. We find that a subsequent interference measurement should give results consistent with the induced phase difference. The inclusion of more cavities in the interference measurements enables the construction in principle of a laboratory in the sense used by Aharonov and Susskind, made up of cavity fields that can serve as frames of phase reference. We also show reasonably simply how intrinsic phase coherence of a beam of light leaking from a single cavity arises for any internal cavity state, even a photon number state. Although the work presented here may have some implications for the current controversy over whether or not a typical laboratory laser produces a coherent state, it is not the purpose of this paper to enter this controversy; rather it is to examine the interesting quantum physics that arises for cavities with more general internal states.
We examine the phase relationships between different packets of a beam of light emitted from a cavity through a partially transmitting mirror. We find that the beam has a pronounced phase coherence even when the intracavity field has a completely indeterminate phase such as, for example, when it is in a pure photon number state. In this case, the phase coherence can be directly attributed to entanglement caused by the partially transmitting mirror and, even though the external light has phase coherence, it has no identifiable phase. Consequently there is no phase diffusion but there is diffusion of the phase difference between a packet and the intracavity field. Remarkably, we find that the phase coherence of the beam is almost independent of the intracavity state, provided this has a reasonably narrow number-state distribution about a large mean value.
Pfleegor and Mandel produced interference effects from two separate independent laser beams when the quanta arriving at the detector were separated in time by an average of about 1.4\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}${10}^{\ensuremath{-}7}$ sec. If the quanta are photons (particles), then, to produce interference, each photon must store energy in the detector for an average of at least 1.4\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}${10}^{\ensuremath{-}7}$ sec. But J\'anossy and N\'aray have recently shown that over a period of 9\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}${10}^{\ensuremath{-}9}$ sec there is no such storage, at least when the phases are random. Thus the result of Pfleegor and Mandel is in conflict with the corpuscular concept of visible light.
We examine a typical two-source optical interference apparatus consisting of two cavities, a beam splitter, and two detectors. We show that field-field interference occurs even when the cavities are not initially in coherent states but rather in other nonclassical states. However, we find that the visibility of the second-order interference, that is, the expectation values of the detectors' readings, changes from 100%, when the cavities are prepared in coherent states, to zero visibility when they are initially in single Fock states. We calculate the fourth-order interference, and for the latter case find that it corresponds to a case where the currents oscillate with 100% visibility, but with a random phase for every experiment. Finally, we suggest an experimental realization of the apparatus with nonclassical sources.
The Pfleegor-Mandel experiment showing the interference between two beams coming from two independent lasers is reviewed. It is argued that the interference fringes detected by Pfleegor and Mandel may not be caused by the interference, which is an interaction between the two beams. Instead of the interference between the two beams coming from two lasers, the following is suggested. The photons coming from the first laser interact with the environment of the path leading from the second laser, and the photons coming from the second laser interact with the environment of the path leading from the first laser. A modification of the Pfleegor-Mandel experiment that eliminates the possible interaction with the path from the other laser is proposed.
Interference phenomena, such as those observed in Young’s double-slit experiment, are foundational to quantum mechanics, yet their interpretation continues to spark debate. Villas-Boas et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 133603 (2025)] propose a quantum-optical framework attributing non-detection in regions of destructive interference to photons occupying ``perfectly dark'' states, which they claim do not interact with a two-level atom sensor due to vanishing coupling in the Jaynes-Cummings Hamiltonian. We argue that this interpretation is fundamentally flawed. Dark states, such as the out-of-phase coherent state ∣α,−α⟩, are readily detectable in alternative experimental setups, including dispersive coupling in cavity QED and photon-counting detectors like photomultiplier tubes or avalanche photodiodes, which are sensitive to the photon number operator. This detectability undermines the assertion that dark states are the intrinsic cause of non-detection in destructive interference regions. Instead, the quantum mechanical superposition principle, combined with the Born rule, fully accounts for interference patterns across all detection schemes, as evidenced by well-established experiments such as single-photon double-slit interference, Hong-Ou-Mandel two-photon interference, and cavity QED measurements. By overgeneralizing a detector-specific effect, the dark-state framework introduces an unnecessary and redundant construct, as the standard quantum mechanical formalism already provides a complete and experimentally validated explanation of interference phenomena.
Interference effects produced by independent quantum sources are investigated, when the state of the field is not describable as a simple mixture of coherent states. The results of classical and quantum-mechanical calculations are compared. Whereas correlation effects are predicted both classically and quantum mechanically when the sources have random phases, there are important differences when the number of atoms is small. In particular, when each source consists of just one atom, the joint probability of detecting two photons at two different points in the receiving plane is found to vanish when the distance between them is an odd number of half fringes. Finally it is shown that when the number of atoms of each source is subject to Poisson fluctuations, one recovers the solution given by classical optics for thermal light, no matter how weak the sources may be on the average.