The authors expose the hypothesis concerning the relationship between cognitive and electrophysiological characteristics of hypnagogic-like states and quantum events. On the basis of this hypothesis the wakefulness consciousness state is characterized by restricted perception of reality caused by perceptive and behavioral top-down schemes. Such cognitive schemes could be expression of hidden parameters to integrate with wave-function. They could be the reason for which it isn’t possible during ordinary awareness to perceive reality in states superposition and consciousness is sufficient cause of quantum collapse. Therefore the cognitive schemes could use nonlocal communications such as transferred potentials among brains to guarantee an objective perception. On the contrary, in some phases of hypnagogic trance, induced by hypnotic suggestion or deep meditation, it could be possible to get at this kind of perception and put in action suitable cognitive schemes to perceive reality in states superposition through typical deprogramming processes of hypnotic therapy. The authors assume that the network of cognitive schemes is an Informational Field influencing mind during wakefulness. On the contrary, during hypnagogic-like state a human subject could perceive better reality in states superposition avoiding its influence. So during hypnagogic state ESP phenomena occur. Nonlocal information models are proposed as a possible mechanism for these anomalous findings.
The authors expose the hypothesis concerning the relationship between cognitive and electrophysiological characteristics of hypnagogic-like states and quantum events. On the basis of this hypothesis the wakefulness consciousness state is characterized by restricted perception of reality caused by perceptive and behavioral top-down schemes. Such cognitive schemes could be expression of hidden parameters to integrate with wave-function. They could be the reason for which it isn’t possible during ordinary awareness to perceive reality in states superposition and consciousness is sufficient cause of quantum collapse. Therefore the cognitive schemes could use nonlocal communications such as transferred potentials among brains to guarantee an objective perception. On the contrary, in some phases of hypnagogic trance, induced by hypnotic suggestion or deep meditation, it could be possible to get at this kind of perception and put in action suitable cognitive schemes to perceive reality in states superposition through typical deprogramming processes of hypnotic therapy. The authors assume that the network of cognitive schemes is an Informational Field influencing mind during wakefulness. On the contrary, during hypnagogic-like state a human subject could perceive better reality in states superposition avoiding its influence. So during hypnagogic state ESP phenomena occur. Nonlocal information models are proposed as a possible mechanism for these anomalous findings.
We discuss mathematical models describing the action of consciousness and super-consciousness as these phenomena are defined in the Extended Everett's Concept (EEC) proposed by the author. According to the Everett's interpretation of quantum mechanics, the state of the quantum world is a superposition of various classical pictures of the world (classical realities, or alternatives). Humans, due to their ability called consciousness, perceive the alternatives separately: all alternatives are perceived, but subjectively perceiving one of them is accompanied by the sensation of the remaining alternatives as if being invisible. This causes the impression that only one of the alternatives really exists, but this is an illusion of consciousness. When consciousness (separating the alternatives) is turned off (in sleep, trance or meditation) or weakened, another ability arises called super-consciousness. Due to super-consciousness, the human gets access to the set of all alternative realities taken as a whole, selects those alternatives that are favorable, and ensures that just these selected alternatives are experienced after consciousness is turned on again. Thus, EEC explains, on the basis of quantum mechanics, those features of consciousness which are usually treated as mystical. It is shown in the paper how these features of consciousness and super-consciousness can be presented by simple mathematical models.
The feasibility of wave function collapse in the human brain has been the subject of vigorous scientific debates since the advent of quantum theory. Scientists like Von Neumann, London, Bauer and Wigner (initially) believed that wave function collapse occurs in the brain or is caused by the mind of the observer. It is a legitimate question to ask how human brain can receive subtle external visual quantum information intact when it must pass through very noisy and complex pathways from the eye to the brain? There are several approaches to investigate information processing in the brain, each of which presents a different set of conclusions. Penrose and Hameroff have hypothesized that there is quantum information processing inside the human brain whose material substrate involves microtubules and consciousness is the result of a collective wavefunction collapse occurring in these structures. Conversely, Tegmark stated that owing to thermal decoherence there cannot be any quantum processing in neurons of the brain and processing in the brain must be classical for cognitive processes. However, Rosa and Faber presented an argument for a middle way which shows that none of the previous authors are completely right and despite the presence of decoherence, it is still possible to consider the brain to be a quantum system. Additionally, Thaheld, has concluded that quantum states of photons do collapse in the human eye and there is no possibility for collapse of visual quantum states in the brain and thus there is no possibility for the quantum state reduction in the brain. In this paper we conclude that if we accept the main essence of the above approaches taken together, each of them can provide a different part of a teleportation mechanism.
The quantum mind or quantum consciousness group of hypotheses propose that classical mechanics cannot explain consciousness. Quantum theory is used to insert models of cognition that target to be more innovative than models based on traditional classical probability theory, which includes cognitive modeling phenomena in science. At the moment we can say that there is no clearly defined neurophysiological mechanisms of creation of the quantum-like representation of information in the brain, but we can mention the hypothesis of matching the information processing in the brain with quantum information and probability with contextuality as the key word. Using limited cognitive resources, incompatibility provides humans the means for answering an unlimited number of questions, thus promoting parsimony and cognitive economy.
The quantum mind or quantum consciousness group of hypotheses propose that classical mechanics cannot explain consciousness. Quantum theory is used to insert models of cognition that target to be more innovative than models based on traditional classical probability theory, which includes cognitive modeling phenomena in science. At the moment we can say that there is no clearly defined neurophysiological mechanisms of creation of the quantum-like representation of information in the brain, but we can mention the hypothesis of matching the information processing in the brain with quantum information and probability with contextuality as the key word. Using limited cognitive resources, incompatibility provides humans the means for answering an unlimited number of questions, thus promoting parsimony and cognitive economy.
The main problem which this paper tries to address is whether collapse of the wave function describing the state of a quantum mechanical system occurs, or, rather can occur in the brain of the observer or not. One of the first (relatively) detailed “collapse models” following the original abstract suggestion by von Neumann that collapse occurs in the brain of the observer and is related to consciousness, is the Orch OR model of Penrose and Hameroff. This model was first criticized by Tegmark on the ground that due to decoherence, quantum processing cannot occur in the human brain. This criticism was countered by saying that due to structural shielding, microtubules inside the neurons can be protected against the wet and warm environment inside the brain. Thaheld, however, in a number of papers argued that quantum visual information carried by the photons from the environment cannot reach the brain intact. In other words, the quantum states of the photons would collapse inside the human eye and only classical information would finally reach the brain and hence no collapse and quantum processing in the brain can take place. In this paper we advance a hypothesis that there is the possibility for the quantum states of photons to be transmitted to the brain in a quantum-like manner. Our approach is based on the quantum teleportation mechanism which includes both classical and quantum aspects of information transfer, but the process itself is wholly quantum mechanical.
The study of consciousness and subjective experience represents one of the most intricate frontiers in contemporary philosophy, psychology, and cognitive science. For decades, dominant paradigms have characterized the mind through two reductive lenses: as a passive receptor of sensory data or as a computational system processing information through fixed algorithmic operations. While useful in specific contexts, these models consistently fail to capture the dynamic, participatory nature of conscious experience—the recursive relationship between awareness and reality construction. Recent theoretical developments challenge these frameworks by integrating diverse conceptual domains: quantum mechanics metaphors, classical mindfulness traditions, and cognitive behavioral theory. These emerging approaches propose a fundamentally transformative role for the observer, suggesting consciousness does not merely witness reality but actively participates in shaping it.