Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Scientific American

An Ideal Experiment

Henry Norris Russell

Published Aug 1, 1940• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1038/scientificamerican0840-74

Related papers

Theory Meets Experiment

R. Casalbuoni, G. Domokos, Susan Kovesi-Domokos +1 more

•Jun 1, 1995•0 citations

Bell inequalities under non-ideal conditions

João N. C. Especial

Bell inequalities applicable to non-ideal EPRB experiments are critical to the interpretation of experimental Bell tests. In this article it is shown that previous treatments of this subject are incorrect due to an implicit assumption and new inequalities are derived under general conditions. Published experimental evidence is reinterpreted under these results and found to be entirely compatible with local-realism, both, when experiments involve inefficient detection, if fair-sampling detection is assumed, as well as when experiments have nearly ideal detection and measurement crosstalk is taken into account.

arXiv:1205.4010•May 17, 2012•0 citations

ON EXPERIMENTS

WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks•Jun 1, 1987•0 citations

Local-Realism Violation in Non-Idealized Experiment

Wu Xiao-Hua

Santos argued that quantum mechanical states which do violate the Bell inequalities are not physically realizable and local hidden-variable theories for quantum mechanics are still possible. We discuss the non-idealized experiment given by Santos, and show local-realism violation in such an experiment without requiring high efficiencies of the detectors and the polarization analyzers.

Communications in Theoretical Physics•Oct 30, 1998•0 citations

Three Simple Experiments

Pieter Kok

Undergraduate lecture notes in physics•Jan 1, 2018•0 citations

Another loophole for the Bell inequalities

Karl Otto Greulich

Detecting non-locality requires almost ideal experimental conditions - ideal sources for entangled photon pairs and ideal detectors. Deviations from this ideal situation may critically hamper interpretations of experiments attempting to prove non-locality. Of two major known loopholes, the detector loophole is not yet unequivocally closed. Now another loophole emerges: When in such experiments down converting crystals with lasers as primary sources are used, exceeding threshold values in the Bell inequalities, i.e. their violation, can be caused by so far not fully recognized problems in the generation and detection of photon pairs. Taken together, nonlocality is still not yet unequivocally proven.

Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE•Aug 20, 2009•1 citation
Bell inequalities applicable to non-ideal EPRB experiments are critical to the interpretation of experimental Bell tests. In this article it is shown that previous treatments of this subject are incorrect due to an implicit assumption and new inequalities are derived under general conditions. Published experimental evidence is reinterpreted under these results and found to be entirely compatible with local-realism, both, when experiments involve inefficient detection, if fair-sampling detection is assumed, as well as when experiments have nearly ideal detection and measurement crosstalk is taken into account.
Detecting non-locality requires almost ideal experimental conditions - ideal sources for entangled photon pairs and ideal detectors. Deviations from this ideal situation may critically hamper interpretations of experiments attempting to prove non-locality. Of two major known loopholes, the detector loophole is not yet unequivocally closed. Now another loophole emerges: When in such experiments down converting crystals with lasers as primary sources are used, exceeding threshold values in the Bell inequalities, i.e. their violation, can be caused by so far not fully recognized problems in the generation and detection of photon pairs. Taken together, nonlocality is still not yet unequivocally proven.