Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1205.4010

Bell inequalities under non-ideal conditions

João N. C. Especial

Published May 17, 2012• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Bell inequalities applicable to non-ideal EPRB experiments are critical to the interpretation of experimental Bell tests. In this article it is shown that previous treatments of this subject are incorrect due to an implicit assumption and new inequalities are derived under general conditions. Published experimental evidence is reinterpreted under these results and found to be entirely compatible with local-realism, both, when experiments involve inefficient detection, if fair-sampling detection is assumed, as well as when experiments have nearly ideal detection and measurement crosstalk is taken into account.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.1205.4010

Related papers

On the relevance of fair sampling assumption in the recent Bell photonic experiments

Afshin Shafiee, Mehdi Golshani

In the experimental verification of Bell's inequalities in real photonic experiments, it is generally believed that the so-called fair sampling assumption (which means that a small fraction of results provide a fair statistical sample) has an unavoidable role. Here, we want to show that the interpretation of these experiments could be feasible, if some different alternative assumptions other than the fair sampling were used. For this purpose, we derive an efficient Bell-type inequality which is a CHSH-type inequality in real experiments. Quantum mechanics violates our proposed inequality, independent of the detection-efficiency problems.

arXiv:quant-ph/0305110•Journal of Modern Optics•Jul 10, 2005•1 citation

A Criticism of the article "An experimental test of non-local realism"

Daniel V. Tausk

I make some critical comments on the article "An experimental test of non-local realism", by S. Groblacher, T. Paterek, R. Kaltenbaek, C. Brukner, M. Zukowski, M. Aspelmeyer, & A. Zeilinger, Nature 446, p. 871-875 (2007). This article makes incorrect claims concerning Bell's theorem. Moreover, I point to the fact that a hypothesis referred to as "realism" in the article (Groblacher et al.) is not used in the deduction of Leggett's inequality.

arXiv:0809.4000•Sep 23, 2008•1 citation

Another loophole for the Bell inequalities

Karl Otto Greulich

Detecting non-locality requires almost ideal experimental conditions - ideal sources for entangled photon pairs and ideal detectors. Deviations from this ideal situation may critically hamper interpretations of experiments attempting to prove non-locality. Of two major known loopholes, the detector loophole is not yet unequivocally closed. Now another loophole emerges: When in such experiments down converting crystals with lasers as primary sources are used, exceeding threshold values in the Bell inequalities, i.e. their violation, can be caused by so far not fully recognized problems in the generation and detection of photon pairs. Taken together, nonlocality is still not yet unequivocally proven.

Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE•Aug 20, 2009•1 citation

A Bell-type Inequality for Real Experiments and The Relevance of Fair Sampling Assumption

Afshin Shafiee, Mehdi Golshani

In the experimental verification of Bell’s inequalities in real photonic experiments, it is generally believed that the so-called fair sampling assumption (which means that a small fraction of results provide a fair statistical sample) has an unavoidable role. Here, we want to show that the interpretation of these experiments is really independent of the fair sampling assumption. For this purpose, we derive a more efficient Bell-type inequality which is a CHSH-type inequality in real experiments, using some alternative assumptions. Furthermore, Quantum mechanics violates our proposed inequality, In his celebrated 1964 paper, John Bell considered a system consisting of two spin-1 particles in a singlet state [1]. He showed that the correlation 2 between the results of two experiments done on such spatially separated particles

•May 20, 2003•0 citations

A Criticism of the article

Daniel V. Tausk

I make some critical comments on the article An experimental test of non-local realism, by S. Groblacher, T. Paterek, R. Kaltenbaek, C. Brukner, M. Zukowski, M. Aspelmeyer, & A. Zeilinger, Nature 446, p. 871-875 (2007). This article makes incorrect claims concerning Bell's theorem. Moreover, I point to the fact that a hypothesis referred to as realism in the article (Groblacher et al.) is not used in the deduction of Leggett's inequality.

•Sep 23, 2008•0 citations

Analysis of Assumptions in BIG Bell Test Experiments

Stanisław Sołtan, Dawid Dopierała, Adam Bednorz

Abstract Recently, a group of experiments tested local realism with random choices prepared by humans. These various tests were subject to additional assumptions, which lead to loopholes in the interpretations of almost all of the experiments. Among these assumptions are fair sampling, no signaling, and faithful reproduction of a Bell‐type quantum model. The data from 9 of 13 experiments were examined and occurring anomalies were analyzed in view of the above assumptions. It is concluded that further tests of local realism need better setup calibration to avoid apparent signaling or necessity of the complicated underlying quantum model.

arXiv:1906.05503•Annalen der Physik•Sep 6, 2020•2 citations
Bell inequalities applicable to non-ideal EPRB experiments are critical to the interpretation of experimental Bell tests. In this article it is shown that previous treatments of this subject are incorrect due to an implicit assumption and new inequalities are derived under general conditions. Published experimental evidence is reinterpreted under these results and found to be entirely compatible with local-realism, both, when experiments involve inefficient detection, if fair-sampling detection is assumed, as well as when experiments have nearly ideal detection and measurement crosstalk is taken into account.
In the experimental verification of Bell's inequalities in real photonic experiments, it is generally believed that the so-called fair sampling assumption (which means that a small fraction of results provide a fair statistical sample) has an unavoidable role. Here, we want to show that the interpretation of these experiments could be feasible, if some different alternative assumptions other than the fair sampling were used. For this purpose, we derive an efficient Bell-type inequality which is a CHSH-type inequality in real experiments. Quantum mechanics violates our proposed inequality, independent of the detection-efficiency problems.
Detecting non-locality requires almost ideal experimental conditions - ideal sources for entangled photon pairs and ideal detectors. Deviations from this ideal situation may critically hamper interpretations of experiments attempting to prove non-locality. Of two major known loopholes, the detector loophole is not yet unequivocally closed. Now another loophole emerges: When in such experiments down converting crystals with lasers as primary sources are used, exceeding threshold values in the Bell inequalities, i.e. their violation, can be caused by so far not fully recognized problems in the generation and detection of photon pairs. Taken together, nonlocality is still not yet unequivocally proven.
In the experimental verification of Bell’s inequalities in real photonic experiments, it is generally believed that the so-called fair sampling assumption (which means that a small fraction of results provide a fair statistical sample) has an unavoidable role. Here, we want to show that the interpretation of these experiments is really independent of the fair sampling assumption. For this purpose, we derive a more efficient Bell-type inequality which is a CHSH-type inequality in real experiments, using some alternative assumptions. Furthermore, Quantum mechanics violates our proposed inequality, In his celebrated 1964 paper, John Bell considered a system consisting of two spin-1 particles in a singlet state [1]. He showed that the correlation 2 between the results of two experiments done on such spatially separated particles
Abstract Recently, a group of experiments tested local realism with random choices prepared by humans. These various tests were subject to additional assumptions, which lead to loopholes in the interpretations of almost all of the experiments. Among these assumptions are fair sampling, no signaling, and faithful reproduction of a Bell‐type quantum model. The data from 9 of 13 experiments were examined and occurring anomalies were analyzed in view of the above assumptions. It is concluded that further tests of local realism need better setup calibration to avoid apparent signaling or necessity of the complicated underlying quantum model.