Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Optics Communications

Bright entanglement and the Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen paradox with coupled parametric oscillators

N. Olivier, M. K. Olsen

Published Oct 18, 2005• 14 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1016/j.optcom.2005.09.071

Related papers

Realization of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox in the far-field of the optical parametric oscillator above threshold

F. CASTELLI and L. A. LUGIATO

Journal of Modern Optics•Apr 1, 1997•2 citations

Tunable delay of Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen entanglement

Alberto M. Marino, Raphael C. Pooser, Vincent Boyer +1 more

Nature•Feb 1, 2009•249 citations

Bright tripartite entanglement in triply concurrent parametric oscillation

Ashton S. Bradley, M. K. Olsen, Olivier Pfister +1 more

We show that an optical parametric oscillator based on three concurrent ${\ensuremath{\chi}}^{(2)}$ nonlinearities can produce, above threshold, bright output beams of macroscopic intensities which exhibit strong tripartite continuous-variable entanglement. We also show that there are two ways that the system can exhibit a three-mode form of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox, and calculate the extracavity fluctuation spectra that may be measured to verify our predictions.

arXiv:quant-ph/0505131•Physical Review A•Nov 4, 2005•77 citations

Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox and quantum steering in pulsed optomechanics

Qiongyi He, M. D. Reid

We describe how to generate an Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) paradox between a mesoscopic mechanical oscillator and an optical pulse. We find two types of paradox, defined by whether it is the oscillator or the pulse that shows the effect Schr\"odinger called ``steering''. Only the oscillator paradox addresses the question of mesoscopic local reality for a massive system. In that case, EPR's ``elements of reality'' are defined for the oscillator, and it is these elements of reality that are falsified (if quantum mechanics is complete). For this sort of paradox, we show that a thermal barrier exists, meaning that a threshold level of pulse-oscillator interaction is required for a given thermal occupation ${n}_{0}$ of the oscillator. We find there is no equivalent thermal barrier for the entanglement of the pulse with the oscillator or for the EPR paradox that addresses the local reality of the optical system. Finally, we examine the possibility of an EPR paradox between two entangled oscillators. Our work highlights the asymmetrical effect of thermal noise on quantum nonlocality.

arXiv:1211.1779•Physical Review A•Nov 19, 2013•92 citations

Quantum entanglement: No paradox

Tim D. Reid

Nature China•Dec 19, 2007•0 citations

Survival of Entanglement in an Optical Parametric Oscillation from Decoherence

Desalegn Ayehu

International Journal of Theoretical Physics•Aug 28, 2021•8 citations
We describe how to generate an Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) paradox between a mesoscopic mechanical oscillator and an optical pulse. We find two types of paradox, defined by whether it is the oscillator or the pulse that shows the effect Schr\"odinger called ``steering''. Only the oscillator paradox addresses the question of mesoscopic local reality for a massive system. In that case, EPR's ``elements of reality'' are defined for the oscillator, and it is these elements of reality that are falsified (if quantum mechanics is complete). For this sort of paradox, we show that a thermal barrier exists, meaning that a threshold level of pulse-oscillator interaction is required for a given thermal occupation n0{n}_{0}n0​ of the oscillator. We find there is no equivalent thermal barrier for the entanglement of the pulse with the oscillator or for the EPR paradox that addresses the local reality of the optical system. Finally, we examine the possibility of an EPR paradox between two entangled oscillators. Our work highlights the asymmetrical effect of thermal noise on quantum nonlocality.