Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General

Continued fraction perturbation theory: applications to radiative processes in the dipole approximation

S. Swain

Published Aug 1, 1975• 40 citations
Publisher

Abstract

A general perturbation procedure is described for writing down the contributions to any order for the probability of a quantum system described by a time-independent Hamiltonian making a transition from an arbitrary initial state to an arbitrary final state. The results are expressed in terms of certain propagators which involve continued fractions, so that some processes are summed to all orders. The general theory is then applied to a single multilevel atom interacting with any number of modes of the electromagnetic field in the electric dipole approximation. The fundamental theory is considered primarily but a detailed discussion is given of spontaneous and stimulated emission. Expressions for the lineshape are derived incorporating the generalized Lamb shifts and damping constants.

DOI
10.1088/0305-4470/8/8/013

Related papers

A continued fraction solution to the problem of a single atom interacting with a single radiation mode in the electric dipole approximation

S. Swain

Difference equations are derived for the Laplace transforms of the time dependent probability amplitudes of a system consisting of a single photon interacting with a single two-level atom in the electric dipole approximation. Formally exact continued fraction solutions of these difference equations are obtained and applied to the problems of stimulated and spontaneous emission and absorption of radiation.

Journal of Physics A Mathematical Nuclear and General•Feb 1, 1973•70 citations

Transition between atomic states and semi-classical radiation theory using quantum perturbation

Michael de Melo, Angelo Rober Pulici

Some phenomena cannot be solved using the exact solution of the Schrödinger equation. However, using approximated methods such as perturbation theory we are able to obtain remarkable results considering terms up to second order. The physical phenomena studied here are the absorption and stimulated emission by the classical feature. In addition, we are going to discuss the physical meaning of perturbation theory when we treat the behaviour how initial state ket evolves as time goes on. We will evaluate the transition of probability between states, the rate and the energy involved in the atomic transitions. It will be introduced fundamental concepts of quantum mechanics, such as interaction picture, and a general perturbation theory using constant and sinusoidal time-dependent perturbation term. Concerning to these phenomena, we considered the perturbed term of the Hamiltonian of the interaction between the vector potential and electron momentum.

Revista Unifev: Ciência & Tecnologia•Sep 19, 2017•0 citations

Exact summation of higher-order terms in multiphoton processes

Yves Gontier, N. K. Rahman, M. Trahin

The summation of all the higher-order contributions to multiphoton absorption in atoms is presented. The nonperturbative expressions for the transition amplitudes are expressed in terms of continued fractions. They account for the whole perturbation originated by the radiation field on the atom but do not exhibit explicit expression for the level shift. In the case of radiation fields of high intensity the only reliable determination of the level shift involves a careful location of the poles of the resolvent operator. The theory has been tested in considering a two-level atom. An extremely rapid convergence of the continued fractions has been observed, and accurate results concerning high-order resonance shifts have been obtained. The expressions for the transition amplitudes being nonperturbative with regard to the field strength, they can be considered as analytic continuations of the perturbation series. This provides a useful approach to the problem of ultraintense fields.

Physical Review A•Dec 1, 1976•90 citations

Scattering Theory

Donald Gary Swanson

In Section 5.4.2 where we treated time-dependent perturbation theory, we took the perturbation to be of the general form Hˆ(1)(r, t) = 2Hˆ(1)(r) cosωt (9.1) but for absorption and emission of photons, we want the perturbation to be an electromagnetic field of the form E = E0 cosωt eˆz (9.2) so that the perturbing potential is V (r, t) = − ∫ E dz = −qE0z cosωt (9.3) and because of the factor of 2 in Equation (9.1), the matrix element is Hˆ(1)kj = − 12E0〈k|℘z|j〉 (9.4) where ℘z ≡ qz is the z-component of the dipole moment. In the derivation of Equation (5.48) from Equation (5.47), we integrated over the energy E = ~ω, whereas if we instead integrate over ω, the result is Rj→k = 2pi ~2 |Hˆ(1)kj |2 , (9.5) where the δ-function in Equation (5.48) tells us to evaluate the expression at ω = ωkj . The energy density in an electric field is given by and we let u→ ρ(ω)dω so that Rj→k = pi ²0~2 |〈k|℘z|j〉|2ρ(ω) , (9.6) and There is nothing special about the z-direction in evaluating the matrix element, so it is common to use the magnitude instead of the single component, where by symmetry, |℘|2 = |℘x|2 + |℘y|2 + |℘z|2 = 3|℘z|2 so the final result is expressed as Rj→k = pi 3²0~2 |〈k|℘|j〉|2ρ(ω) . (9.7) If we imagine a closed system in equilibrium, where there are atoms in both the lower state (ψk) and in the upper state (ψj), we can be assured that there is a balance between the rates of emission and absorption. If we define the spontaneous emission rate to be A∗ so that if there are Nj atoms in the upper state, there will be NjA transitions per second from state j to state k, as illustrated in Figure 5.2c. There are also transitions from state j to state k by stimulated emission as illustrated in Figure 5.2a. This rate is proportional to the energy density in the electromagnetic field of the wave and is given by Bjkρ(ω), where Bjk is proportional to Rk from Equation (5.48) and ρ(ω) is the energy density in the electric field of the wave at frequency ω. The total number of transitions per second from state j to state k due to stimulated emission is therefore NjBjkρ(ω). If there is an equilibrium, there must be an equal number of transitions from state k to state j by absorbing photons as illustrated in Figure 5.2b. The total number of transitions per second from state k to state j is then given by NkBkjρ(ω) where Nk is the number of atoms in the lower state (ψk) and Bkj is the transition rate for the absorption process. The rate equation is therefore dNj dt = −NjA−NjBjkρ(ω) +NkBkjρ(ω) . (9.8) In equilibrium, there is a steady state, so dNj/dt = 0, so that the energy density in the wave must be given by ρ(ω) = NjA NkBkj −NjBjk = A (Nk/Nj)Bkj −Bjk . (9.9) Equilibrium also implies, however, that there is a temperature T and that the relative probability of finding an atom in one state compared to another is given by the Boltzmann factor of Equation (7.26), which depends on the energies of the two states such that Nk Nj = e(Ej−Ek)/KT , (9.10) but with Ej − Ek = ~ω, this becomes ρ(ω) = A e~ω/KTBkj −Bjk . (9.11) We wish to relate this energy density expression to the black-body distribution since both are equilibrium expressions, but Equation (9.11) is in terms of the energy density of the electromagnetic field, while our black-body expression of Equation (1.3), which is the same as Equation (7.31) without the zero-point term, is given in terms of the intensity, I(λ, T ). In order to relate these two expressions, we revisit the expression for the density of states given by Equation (7.4) where dxdy dz = V , dpxdpydpz = 4pip2 dp, and p = ~k. Then we have N dxdy dz dpxdpydpz = 4piV h3 ~3k2 dk = V 2pi2 k2 dk . (9.12) Then, since k = ω/c, and since there are two independent photon states for each energy (spin 1 and spin −1), the density of photons is Nω V = ω2 pi2c3 dω e~ω/KT − 1 (9.13) where we have included the Bose-Einstein factor since photons have integral spin, and the energy density is therefore ρ(ω)dω = ~ω Nω V = ~ω3 pi2c3 dω e~ω/KT − 1 . (9.14) Comparing this result with Equation (9.11), we first conclude that Bkj = Bjk, which means that the transition rates are the same for the upward and downward transitions. Solving for A, we find for the spontaneous emission rate, A = ~ω3 pi2c3 Bkj , (9.15) and since, from Equation (9.7) Bkj = pi|〈k|℘|j〉|2 3²0~2 , (9.16) the spontaneous rate is given by A = ω3|〈k|℘|j〉|2 3pi²0~c3 . (9.17) and The lifetime in an excited state is the reciprocal of the spontaneous rate, although if there is more than one final state, the lifetime is the reciprocal of the sum of the various rates.

Taylor & Francis eBooks•Aug 9, 2006•0 citations

Time-dependent Perturbations and Semi-classical Treatment of Interaction of Field with Matter

A. C. Sharma

How to deal with time-dependent potentials, what kinds of physical problems having time-dependent potentials can be solved exactly and which are to be solved with the use of perturbation theory, what are different possible forms of time-dependent perturbating fields, and semi-classical treatment of the interaction of fields with matter are the subject matters of this chapter. First order perturbation theory, computation of transition probability, transition rates and Fermi's Golden Rule for harmonic and constant perturbations, absorption, stimulated emission and dipole approximation when electromagnetic fields interact with matter, spontaneous emission and Einstein coefficients, and dipole selection rules are other topics which are dealt with in detail in the chapter. Discussions with properly justified mathematical treatment on time-dependent potentials and on the exactly solvable time-dependent two-state systems are the special foci of this chapter.

CRC Press eBooks•Jun 18, 2021•0 citations

Generalized nonrelativistic Lamb-shift theory

R. Bullough, P. J. Caudrey

Reports a natural all-order decorrelation procedure for the interaction of a single two-level atom with all modes of the radiation field which replaces the semiclassical boson approximation for the atom by an exact fermion treatment. In consequence, the spontaneous emission of the semiclassical theory is extended to include stimulated emission, a semiclassical Lamb-type shift is explicitly replaced by a shift satisfying the Bethe formula manifestly due to vacuum fluctuations, and there can be two intensity-dependent terms, one of which generalizes the Bethe formula.

Journal of physics. A, Proceedings of the Physical Society. General•May 1, 1971•10 citations
A general perturbation procedure is described for writing down the contributions to any order for the probability of a quantum system described by a time-independent Hamiltonian making a transition from an arbitrary initial state to an arbitrary final state. The results are expressed in terms of certain propagators which involve continued fractions, so that some processes are summed to all orders. The general theory is then applied to a single multilevel atom interacting with any number of modes of the electromagnetic field in the electric dipole approximation. The fundamental theory is considered primarily but a detailed discussion is given of spontaneous and stimulated emission. Expressions for the lineshape are derived incorporating the generalized Lamb shifts and damping constants.
Some phenomena cannot be solved using the exact solution of the Schrödinger equation. However, using approximated methods such as perturbation theory we are able to obtain remarkable results considering terms up to second order. The physical phenomena studied here are the absorption and stimulated emission by the classical feature. In addition, we are going to discuss the physical meaning of perturbation theory when we treat the behaviour how initial state ket evolves as time goes on. We will evaluate the transition of probability between states, the rate and the energy involved in the atomic transitions. It will be introduced fundamental concepts of quantum mechanics, such as interaction picture, and a general perturbation theory using constant and sinusoidal time-dependent perturbation term. Concerning to these phenomena, we considered the perturbed term of the Hamiltonian of the interaction between the vector potential and electron momentum.
The summation of all the higher-order contributions to multiphoton absorption in atoms is presented. The nonperturbative expressions for the transition amplitudes are expressed in terms of continued fractions. They account for the whole perturbation originated by the radiation field on the atom but do not exhibit explicit expression for the level shift. In the case of radiation fields of high intensity the only reliable determination of the level shift involves a careful location of the poles of the resolvent operator. The theory has been tested in considering a two-level atom. An extremely rapid convergence of the continued fractions has been observed, and accurate results concerning high-order resonance shifts have been obtained. The expressions for the transition amplitudes being nonperturbative with regard to the field strength, they can be considered as analytic continuations of the perturbation series. This provides a useful approach to the problem of ultraintense fields.
In Section 5.4.2 where we treated time-dependent perturbation theory, we took the perturbation to be of the general form Hˆ(1)(r, t) = 2Hˆ(1)(r) cosωt (9.1) but for absorption and emission of photons, we want the perturbation to be an electromagnetic field of the form E = E0 cosωt eˆz (9.2) so that the perturbing potential is V (r, t) = − ∫ E dz = −qE0z cosωt (9.3) and because of the factor of 2 in Equation (9.1), the matrix element is Hˆ(1)kj = − 12E0〈k|℘z|j〉 (9.4) where ℘z ≡ qz is the z-component of the dipole moment. In the derivation of Equation (5.48) from Equation (5.47), we integrated over the energy E = ~ω, whereas if we instead integrate over ω, the result is Rj→k = 2pi ~2 |Hˆ(1)kj |2 , (9.5) where the δ-function in Equation (5.48) tells us to evaluate the expression at ω = ωkj . The energy density in an electric field is given by and we let u→ ρ(ω)dω so that Rj→k = pi ²0~2 |〈k|℘z|j〉|2ρ(ω) , (9.6) and There is nothing special about the z-direction in evaluating the matrix element, so it is common to use the magnitude instead of the single component, where by symmetry, |℘|2 = |℘x|2 + |℘y|2 + |℘z|2 = 3|℘z|2 so the final result is expressed as Rj→k = pi 3²0~2 |〈k|℘|j〉|2ρ(ω) . (9.7) If we imagine a closed system in equilibrium, where there are atoms in both the lower state (ψk) and in the upper state (ψj), we can be assured that there is a balance between the rates of emission and absorption. If we define the spontaneous emission rate to be A∗ so that if there are Nj atoms in the upper state, there will be NjA transitions per second from state j to state k, as illustrated in Figure 5.2c. There are also transitions from state j to state k by stimulated emission as illustrated in Figure 5.2a. This rate is proportional to the energy density in the electromagnetic field of the wave and is given by Bjkρ(ω), where Bjk is proportional to Rk from Equation (5.48) and ρ(ω) is the energy density in the electric field of the wave at frequency ω. The total number of transitions per second from state j to state k due to stimulated emission is therefore NjBjkρ(ω). If there is an equilibrium, there must be an equal number of transitions from state k to state j by absorbing photons as illustrated in Figure 5.2b. The total number of transitions per second from state k to state j is then given by NkBkjρ(ω) where Nk is the number of atoms in the lower state (ψk) and Bkj is the transition rate for the absorption process. The rate equation is therefore dNj dt = −NjA−NjBjkρ(ω) +NkBkjρ(ω) . (9.8) In equilibrium, there is a steady state, so dNj/dt = 0, so that the energy density in the wave must be given by ρ(ω) = NjA NkBkj −NjBjk = A (Nk/Nj)Bkj −Bjk . (9.9) Equilibrium also implies, however, that there is a temperature T and that the relative probability of finding an atom in one state compared to another is given by the Boltzmann factor of Equation (7.26), which depends on the energies of the two states such that Nk Nj = e(Ej−Ek)/KT , (9.10) but with Ej − Ek = ~ω, this becomes ρ(ω) = A e~ω/KTBkj −Bjk . (9.11) We wish to relate this energy density expression to the black-body distribution since both are equilibrium expressions, but Equation (9.11) is in terms of the energy density of the electromagnetic field, while our black-body expression of Equation (1.3), which is the same as Equation (7.31) without the zero-point term, is given in terms of the intensity, I(λ, T ). In order to relate these two expressions, we revisit the expression for the density of states given by Equation (7.4) where dxdy dz = V , dpxdpydpz = 4pip2 dp, and p = ~k. Then we have N dxdy dz dpxdpydpz = 4piV h3 ~3k2 dk = V 2pi2 k2 dk . (9.12) Then, since k = ω/c, and since there are two independent photon states for each energy (spin 1 and spin −1), the density of photons is Nω V = ω2 pi2c3 dω e~ω/KT − 1 (9.13) where we have included the Bose-Einstein factor since photons have integral spin, and the energy density is therefore ρ(ω)dω = ~ω Nω V = ~ω3 pi2c3 dω e~ω/KT − 1 . (9.14) Comparing this result with Equation (9.11), we first conclude that Bkj = Bjk, which means that the transition rates are the same for the upward and downward transitions. Solving for A, we find for the spontaneous emission rate, A = ~ω3 pi2c3 Bkj , (9.15) and since, from Equation (9.7) Bkj = pi|〈k|℘|j〉|2 3²0~2 , (9.16) the spontaneous rate is given by A = ω3|〈k|℘|j〉|2 3pi²0~c3 . (9.17) and The lifetime in an excited state is the reciprocal of the spontaneous rate, although if there is more than one final state, the lifetime is the reciprocal of the sum of the various rates.
How to deal with time-dependent potentials, what kinds of physical problems having time-dependent potentials can be solved exactly and which are to be solved with the use of perturbation theory, what are different possible forms of time-dependent perturbating fields, and semi-classical treatment of the interaction of fields with matter are the subject matters of this chapter. First order perturbation theory, computation of transition probability, transition rates and Fermi's Golden Rule for harmonic and constant perturbations, absorption, stimulated emission and dipole approximation when electromagnetic fields interact with matter, spontaneous emission and Einstein coefficients, and dipole selection rules are other topics which are dealt with in detail in the chapter. Discussions with properly justified mathematical treatment on time-dependent potentials and on the exactly solvable time-dependent two-state systems are the special foci of this chapter.
Reports a natural all-order decorrelation procedure for the interaction of a single two-level atom with all modes of the radiation field which replaces the semiclassical boson approximation for the atom by an exact fermion treatment. In consequence, the spontaneous emission of the semiclassical theory is extended to include stimulated emission, a semiclassical Lamb-type shift is explicitly replaced by a shift satisfying the Bethe formula manifestly due to vacuum fluctuations, and there can be two intensity-dependent terms, one of which generalizes the Bethe formula.