The argument made in the cited Comment is based on a calculation that was not intended in the original paper. Starting from a fully quantum expression, application of the ℏ→0 limit after every bracket calculation as stated in the paper retains consistent orders of ℏ and does obey the Jacobi identity.
A quantum-classical bracket is proposed and is shown to satisfy the Jacobi identity, in contrast to previous definitions that obey this property only up to higher order terms in the Planck constant variant Planck's over 2pi. The Jacobi identity is required of a true Lie bracket and ensures that the Lie bracket of constants of motion is also a constant of motion. An explicit calculation of the Jacobi identity highlights the difference between the proposed and traditional definitions. A further example illustrates that the proposed bracket generates a more consistent quantum-classical dynamics than the traditional bracket. The traditional quantum-classical dynamics in the Henon-Heiles system diverges due to higher order variant Planck's over 2pi terms. The divergence is eliminated with the proposed bracket.